Great Britain Cycling Team performance director Stephen Park insists “It is too early to be writing Britain off yet," despite a disappointing performance at the UCI Track Cycling World Championships in Pruszkow, Poland, last week.
Elinor Barker’s victory in the points race on the opening day was the sole gold medal, while silvers were added in the men’s and women’s team pursuits and Ethan Hayter won bronze in the men’s omnium.
The country’s hopes of success in the women’s Madison – a first-time Olympic event at Tokyo – were dealt a blow when the number one pairing of Laura Trott and Katie Archibald were both forced to cut short their championships through, respectively, illness and concussion.
Team GB has dominated the track cycling events at the past three Olympic Games and Park told BBC Sport: "Medallists who went to Rio were just emerging as riders at this stage."
The Netherlands and Australia each took six gold medals in Poland, with Great Britain sixth in the medal table.
But, a year and a half out from the Olympics, it’s a situation the country has found itself in before.
UK Sport funding across Olympic disciplines is based on the performances at the Games themselves – and Team GB upping its game on sport’s biggest stage after seemingly underperforming at the previous year’s Worlds happened ahead of both London 2012 and Rio 2016.
"We've still got 17 months so plenty of runway yet - we're not at desperation stakes or anything," Park said.
"We are certainly clear that there are some gaps to be made up not just in sprinting but in the endurance events as well.
"If we look four years ago, we finished 10th on the medal table. It is too early to be writing Britain off yet."
Add new comment
13 comments
There are so many people arguing over what should have been done, but I think most when presented with the facts would realize the organizers did the only thing they could have and that it was not a sexist decision!
If it happened the way all the reports have inferred, then yes, you could argue sexism was behind the call. However, every single article about this that I've seen has the facts wrong or have left out some very important facts.
The men were not racing at a slower pace, just the peloton and the convoy following it. At the time of the neutralization, there was a breakaway in the men's race that had around a 14 minute lead! All the people who question why the women weren't allowed to pass the slower men do not realize there were four men that far ahead. A 14 minute lead at the pace they were racing is around a 10km stretch. Not only that, the cobbles were less than 5km ahead when the women were paused, so the lead men were actually through the first section of cobbles, hopefully if you are on this site you understand why you can't easily pause a race that is goig 40 kmh on cobbles!
Following the cobbles, the race courses diverged with the women's course making a right turn while the men's course went straight. After all the men passed the spot where the women were to turn, the course would be modified or officials/police prepared for the women’s right turn (the men would later return to this spot at which point they also would turn right). So not only were the upcoming cobbles the men were already on (and through) a reason to pause the women who were still on wider well paved roads, the fact the races were soon diverging made intermixxing the two races a logistical and safety nightmare!
The following is actual race commentary from before the women paused: "After covering 39.8km in the first hour of racing, Howes, Devriendt, Jans and Wirtgen have a lead of some 13:50 over the peloton. Deceuninck-QuickStep take this as their cue to hit the front and set about trimming that lead down to more manageable proportions."
So for the first hour of the men's race, the average pace at the front was 40km an hour!
Unfortunately, lots of people, including the race's own press release regarding the neutralization, have gotten the facts wrong or left some of the important details I've mentioned above out.
Nubike kickstarter finished on Feb 14th and failed to raise enough money.............
So, there are limits to insanity.
I remember a guy in Lowestoft who’d engineered a beautiful hydraulic transmission for his bicycle. Of course, it was quite inefficient, but adequate for utility cycling. I don’t think it had variable transmission ratios, but a modern version, might be able to beat a NuVinci on weight and power efficiency. Perhaps Rohloff is already working on it:)
#Nicole Hanselmann Oh man really? I wonder what the fallout for Nicole would have been had she just pushed on through? Disqualification probably but massive exposure for her sponsors? It'd have been worth it I’m sure
There was a gentleman I used to meet between Frimley Green and Farnborough North, in the Hatches, who had developed his own system of near vertical pedal strokes, I think it may of had gears. It did look to work better than that one. Nice bloke too.
Oi, road.cc, why can’t we delete duplicate posts?!!
NuBike
It may have some merit, it would be good to know the efficiency of the drive train, rather than be shown serious misunderstanding of leverage and gravity. By the look of the pedalling "cadence" in the video, the mechanical advantage of the drivetrain is similar to that of a chain driven drivetrain. However, there appears to be no way to vary the mechancal advantage so, at best, this is a single speed bike. It is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirkpatrick_Macmillan's treadle system revisited. DoesNuBike's "inventor" realise this?
.
mispelled.jpeg
We hate to point it out to this well-meaning gent, but it's probably always best to check your spelling and grammar if you're committing the words to your skin permanently!
I hate to point it out, but it might be best for road.cc to let other people's spelling and grammar mistakes pass without comment.
Dont no wot ur talkin aboot...
This. IMO they either need to put a *much* bigger gap between the two races or else (shock! horror!) run the women's race as a completely separate event, on a different day.
Or run them together as separate but simultaneous races, just as there are different categories running in the same marathons.
I feel like this may be the way more sports need to go. With the latest controversy in the news over intersex and transgender athletes I feel that there is going to have to be some hard questions asked about equality, as two diffrent views on equality clash.
I think more immediately we need to stop beliving that athletes are experts on a sport just because they participate in it. We have seen so many statements on trans and intersex athletes on both sides of the debate that are not based on facts at all. In the case of this race we are seeing people chime in with statements about the women showing the men, how the men should let the women through etc. which completely failes to understand the sport. Road cycle racing is not about going flat out all the time, its about managing energy and there is a flow of the race. Clearly the flow of the womens race was diffrent to the mens, and the organisers failed to take this in to account. If the mens race had been stopped it would either have to be stopped for a long time or probably ended up catching the womens race once the pace picked up. There is a small chance the mens race could have been slower, but assuming that would be a huge risk.