Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Government reportedly set to announce new causing death by dangerous cycling offence this week

Move follows reaction to Kim Briggs case -- but cycling campaigners say focus should be on drivers who kill

The government is expected to announce plans this week to introduce an offence of causing death by dangerous cycling according to a report in the Mail on Sunday.

The new offence would reportedly be subject to the same penalties as causing death by careless driving, which carries a maximum punishment of 14 years’ imprisonment.

However, cycling campaigners have said that the government should follow through on a pledge made four years ago to review all road traffic offences, as well as focusing on how the thousands of deaths caused by motorists each year, rather than the handful in which cyclists are involved.

Since cyclist Charlie Alliston was convicted at the Old Bailey last year of killing pedestrian Kim Briggs after crashing into her in London’s Old Street in 2016, there have been calls for cyclists to be subject to similar laws as motorists.

Alliston had been acquitted by a jury of manslaughter in relation to Mrs Briggs’ death, but was found guilty of causing bodily harm through wanton and furious driving, an offence created under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.

In the wake of that case, the victim’s widower, Matthew Briggs, launched a campaign calling for the law to be updated that has received widespread coverage in the media.

Last September, his MP Heidi Alexander (Lewisham East) asked Theresa May at Prime Minister’s Questions whether the government would extend the law on dangerous driving to encompass cyclists as well as motorists.

> Prime Minister urged to extend dangerous driving law to cyclists

Subsequently, transport minister Jesse Norman announced that the government would conduct a review of cycle safety, initially focusing on whether a new offence for cyclists equivalent to causing death by careless or dangerous driving should be introduced.

> Government announces cycle safety review in wake of Alliston case

A spokesman for the Department for Transport, quoted on the Guardian website today, said: “We are carrying out a review to improve all elements of cycle safety.

“This includes looking at the case for a new offence, equivalent to causing death or serious injury by careless or dangerous driving, to help protect both cyclists and pedestrians.”

Caspar Hughes, who is on the co-ordinating committee of the campaign group Stop Killing Cyclists, told road.cc: “Three people were killed by a speeding driver at a bus stop last month in one incident, the same number of people as killed by cyclists in the whole of the UK last year. In total there were nearly 1,800 people killed by drivers in the same period.

“Unfortunately, in this case the government isn’t strong enough push through evidence-based policy that keeps the safety of the majority of the population at its heart. Time and time again they are cowed into creating populist policy by the press and this an example of that process.

“A significant way to improve everyone’s safety would be to invest £3 billion a year on supporting cycling, a mode of transport that is far gentler on society than driving,” he added.

Cycling UK said that rather than focusing solely on offences that may be committed by cyclists, the government needed to undertake a full review of road laws and penalties.

Duncan Dollimore, the charity’s head of campaigns, said: “The way in which the justice system deals with mistakes, carelessness, recklessness and deliberately dangerous behaviour by all road users hasn’t been fit for purpose for years.

“Adding one or two new offences specific to cyclists would just be tinkering around the edges, when what’s needed is a full review of all road traffic offences and penalties, something the government promised back in 2014 but have yet to deliver.

“If they’re serious about addressing behaviour on our roads that puts others at risk they should grasp the opportunity to do the job properly, and conduct the holistic review that’s long overdue, rather than attempt to patch up an area of legislation that’s simply not working."

The offence of causing death by careless driving, which carries a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment, may be brought in cases where the standard of driving "fell below the standard expected of a careful and competent driver."

The more serious charge of causing death by dangerous driving, punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment, is brought when the standard of driving "fell far below the standard expected of a careful and competent driver."

The offence of causing serious injury by dangerous driving, which has a maximum penalty of five years in jail, was introduced in late 2012 under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act following lobbying by road safety campaigners including Cycling UK.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

38 comments

Avatar
ChetManley | 6 years ago
10 likes

I see media outlets reporting pedestrians killed and injured by cyclists, cyclists killed and injured on the roads, but not pedestrians killed and injured my motorists.

Doing so I believe would put the 'problem' of dangerous cycling into perspective.

Mr. Briggs needs a more constructive outlet for his grief I think.

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid | 6 years ago
17 likes

The don't give a monkey's about doing the right thing; they care about being seen to do something percieved as popular.

The right thing would be to clamp down on shit drivers. 

Avatar
Grahamd replied to Russell Orgazoid | 6 years ago
3 likes

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

The don't give a monkey's about doing the right thing; they care about being seen to do something percieved as popular.

The right thing would be to clamp down on shit drivers. 

Since when did the government do the right thing, they pander to populism and pressure groups not giving a shit about anyone except themselves. 

Avatar
Housecathst | 6 years ago
14 likes

Well with cyclists being responsible for 0.18% of deaths on the roads every year this is time and money well spent by the government. 

Avatar
Tony replied to Housecathst | 6 years ago
0 likes

Housecathst wrote:

Well with cyclists being responsible for 0.18% of deaths on the roads every year this is time and money well spent by the government. 

 

Cyclists are responsible for only 25% of those.  The victim was responsible in the other 75% (stepped off kerb without looking etc). So 0.045%. 

Avatar
burtthebike | 6 years ago
17 likes

As expected, the review of cycle safety, a euphemism if ever I heard one, was apparently held in secret by people who hate cycling.  I for one am astonished.

From the Guardian website:

"A Department for Transport spokesman said: “We are carrying out a review to improve all elements of cycle safety.”"

No they aren't.  They are carrying out a witch-hunt because a publicity seeking widower got the attention of the petrolhead media.

No government has done right by cyclists, but this government really is the worst ever.  Perhaps best described as a cactus; everything on it is a prick.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 6 years ago
10 likes

It doesn't have to be one or the other.  We can have a dangerous cycling law as well as stiffer penalties for dangerous driving.

I have no problems with a dangerous cycling law, but let's hope more attention is paid to the pathetic punishments drivers receive for flouting current laws.  And lets see more lifetime bans please.  For instance, if you're banned once, that's your final warning - commit a bannable offence once more, and you're banned for life.

Avatar
Canyon48 replied to Accessibility for all | 6 years ago
4 likes

Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

It doesn't have to be one or the other.  We can have a dangerous cycling law as well as stiffer penalties for dangerous driving.

I have no problems with a dangerous cycling law, but let's hope more attention is paid to the pathetic punishments drivers receive for flouting current laws.  And lets see more lifetime bans please.  For instance, if you're banned once, that's your final warning - commit a bannable offence once more, and you're banned for life.

Agreed. I would like to see very clear, unambiguous road laws for cyclists.

Equally, I desperately want to see appropriate punishments for those who drive dangerously etc. I'm tired of drivers beeping at me, swerving at me and telling me to get off the ****ing road, it would be nice if it was made very explicitly clear that cyclists are allowed on roads.

Rather too many ignorant people out there (regardless of their means of transport)!

Pages

Latest Comments