The family of a cyclist who was killed in a crash at a velodrome in Portsmouth have said that they plan to take legal action after a jury returned a verdict of accidental death at the inquest into his death.
Police officer Richard Phillips-Schofield died in hospital two days after the crash at the Mountbatten Centre’s outdoor track on 9 March 2014.
The incident, which happened during the final lap of the race, saw him crash into the barriers, sustaining fatal injuries to his head and chest.
Portsmouth News reports that in its verdict at the end of the seven-day inquest, the jury said: “Richard died as a result of injuries sustained due to coming into contact at speed with an unyielding object after falling from his cycle.”
However, his father Frederick insists that Phillips-Schofield’s death was “preventable” and that some questions about the circumstances remain unanswered.
‘The barriers played a significant part in Richard’s death and in our view were clearly unsafe and we believe that the event should never have taken place at all,” he said.
He added that the family was “upset that British Cycling did not express their condolences at the time of Richard’s death,” although the organisations then president, Bob Howden, did make a statement at the time.
"My thoughts and those of everyone at British Cycling are with Richard’s family and friends and with his team," he said.
> Cyclist dies after crash at Portsmouth's Mountbatten closed circuit
“This is a tragedy which will sadden the whole cycle sport community in this country.”
At the inquest, barrister David Haines, acting for the Phillips-Schofield family quizzed a director of British Cycling’s director and race organiser Tim Knight from Racing Club Omega, about the safety of the track.
“There was no excuse for an unsafe and dangerous track,” he said, adding that “The person on the day wasn’t suitable to carry out the risk assessment.”
After the jury had delivered its verdict, British Cycling director of cycling Jonny Clay told the inquest that “weaknesses had been exposed” through the crash that caused Mr Phillips-Schofield’s death.
That included new risk assessment procedures being drawn up for venues and events sanctioned by the governing body, and new fencing at Carmarthen and Preston Park velodromes, as well as at the Mountbatten Centre.
However, the victim’s father said: ‘It’s telling that since Richard’s tragic death, belated though it might be, the unsafe barriers at all three closed circuit tracks … have been replaced.
“Although it required my son’s preventable death before action was taken, hopefully that will mean other families do not have to go through what we have experienced,” he added.
Add new comment
3 comments
R.I.P. poor guy.
I know this might sound crass but IF helmets were not a thing would more focus have been put on the crash protection of the barriers? Growing up as a kid playing rugby the posts were never covered, even at the pro level there was barely a thin bit of wadding around the base of the posts and then more cushioning was brought about to prevent head injuries and eventually made compulsary to have the posts covered (though not at all levels).
When we take focus away from certain elements because we beleive we are protecting elsewhere often that element that was ignored/not thought about as much is in fact the greater risk of harm. This is very apparent in many situations and activities both at home, outside and in the work environment.
It must be so horrific for the family when they absolutely beleive that someone was negligent given the risk factors involved and what wasn't done, that a court of law decided it was an 'accident' and they are going to have to fight for compensation that can never replace their loved one.
This is a horrible case. I remember racing Richard when he was still a junior and its tragic that he is no longer here.
His death has certainly brought about changes to the way BC risk assess and the minimum standard of protection seen at circuit races.
Organisers at one local circuit now have about an hours worth of padding and barriering to put up for each of their promotions, which i believe is a direct response to this case.
You can never mitigate against all risk, and certainly racing on the open road, you are placed in to many riskier situations than the barriers represented. However the difference between a road race and a circuit race is that a remote risk presented by, say a barrier, rapidly becomes an unacceptable risk when you factor in that a bunch of 40 - 60 will pass that risk 60 times an hour, for three races per promotion, for say 15-20 promotions a year. A 1 in 1,000,000 chance, gets ~200,000 rolls of the dice each year.
But, were BC willfully negligent here, or the organisers? I am sure the organisers will have worked within the parameters of the risk assessment at the time, so any compensation will hopefully rest with BC.
I'm aware that BC's insurance premium has already increased following this incident to a level that makes the very future of cyclesport questionable. As BC are already paying the price with their insurers, I hope Richards family is able to get acceptable compensation from them.