Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Six new cycling routes announced for London, including links to existing or planned infrastructure

Design work starts on planned infrastructure, which TfL says will be "substantially segregated" on main roads...

Transport for London (TfL) and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan have today announced that design work will start immediately on six new cycle routes in the capital, some of which will provide vital links between existing or planned infrastructure.

The six routes, which will have physical segregation from traffic along much of their length, have been prioritised from a list of 25 drawn up by TfL in partnership with London boroughs as having the highest potential for encouraging more people to cycle in the city.

Khan said: “I’ve committed to invest record amounts in making cycling easier and safer for Londoners, and I’m delighted that work is now beginning on designing the next generation of high-quality cycle routes across the capital.

“Working closely with the boroughs, we’re providing new routes in both inner and outer London, including in areas that haven’t previously seen serious investment in cycling infrastructure.

“Encouraging more Londoners to cycle as part of their everyday routine is vital – providing huge benefits to people’s health, cutting congestion and air pollution for every Londoner, and improving quality of life in local neighbourhoods.”

London’s cycling and walking commissioner, Will Norman, said: “High-quality cycling infrastructure cannot simply be an option available to a minority of Londoners, and our new Strategic Cycling Analysis shows that there is huge potential for getting more people to cycle all across the city.

“Backed up by the Mayor’s record investment, we’re working in close collaboration with London boroughs to design six new cycle routes that would connect key town centres, join up existing cycle infrastructure, and start to create a genuinely pan-London network of cycle routes accessible to millions more Londoners.”

The six routes announced today

The six routes that TfL and the boroughs they run through will now start work on, plus their descriptions, are:

Lea Bridge to Dalston

This 3km route would link the City and Waltham Forest by filling the gap between Lea Bridge Road and Cycle Superhighway 1 at Dalston

Ilford to Barking Riverside

This 8km route would link two bustling outer London town centres and a major growth area with up to 10,800 new homes and a new London Overground connection – while enhancing access to the Elizabeth line and London Overground services

Hackney to the Isle of Dogs

This 8km route would stretch from Hackney to the Isle of Dogs via Canary Wharf, Mile End and Victoria Park

Rotherhithe to Peckham

This 4km route would link Peckham with key and growing destinations such as Canada Water and Surrey Quays, and connect up other cycling routes such as Quietway 1 and the proposed Cycle Superhighway 4

Tottenham Hale to Camden

This 8km route would connect major town centres and will cover seven junctions identified as being among the 73 with the worst safety records

Wembley to Willesden Junction

This 5km route would be north-west London’s first major cycle route, connecting Wembley, Stonebridge Park and Willesden Junction. Future sections will connect to planned infrastructure in west London such as CS9 and CS10.

Some of the routes will provide vital links to cycling infrastructure that already exists or which is in the pipeline.

For example, both the Hackney to the Isle of Dogs route and the one from Peckham to Rotherhithe would link with the planned cycling and walking bridge over the Thames between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf, with the full results of the consultation on that proposed river crossing due to be released in the coming months.

Each of those routes would also link with Cycle Superhighways running east to west on both sides of the river – the existing CS3, which passes just north of the Isle of Dogs, and the proposed CS4, which will run just south of Rotherhithe.

Campaigners welcome today’s announcement

Fran Graham, campaigns co-ordinator at the London Cycling Campaign commented: “The Mayor has laudably promised to triple the amount of protected space for cycling during this mayoralty and commence work on a safe, city-wide cycling network that every Londoner can easily access.

“By enabling cycling to become the natural choice for everyday journeys, this network will play a pivotal role in achieving the Mayor’s goal of reducing the over-dependence on motor vehicles that is congesting our city, damaging public health and contributing to climate change.

“We welcome the announcement of these important new cycle routes as part of that network. Safe, high-quality conditions for cycling are vital in opening up the enjoyment, convenience and affordability of cycling to far more people. We look forward to working with TfL and the boroughs to make these routes a success.”

Sustrans has also welcomed today’s announcement with the sustainable transport charity’s London director, Matt Winfield, saying: “Last year’s figures demonstrate that investment in Dutch-style cycle routes works - with many schemes boosting cycling levels by over 50 per cent in one year alone.

“The Mayor’s Walking and Cycling Commissioner is right to focus the investment where evidence shows it will have the greatest benefits, and start working collaboratively with boroughs to deliver these routes to Dutch standards.

“With cycling and walking levels growing rapidly, the Mayor, TfL and London’s Boroughs need to act quickly make our streets to safer, healthier and better places for people.”

Analysis

One thing immediately noticeable to anyone who has followed the evolution of infrastructure for people on bikes in the capital in the past decade or so is the lack of branding of the routes – that is to say, the words “Cycle Superhighway” or “Quietway” are missing.

That’s not to say that those words may not eventually appear on the designation of the routes.

But it’s fair to say that the designation “Cycle Superhighway” does seem to raise hackles of opponents of such schemes who have visions of cyclists tearing along them, and also alienates some bike riders who want them to be seen as a safe way to get around the city for daily journeys while protected from motor traffic, rather than purely being a fast commuter route.

Meanwhile, “Quietways” have been criticised for the fact that often, they are anything but “quiet,” forcing cyclists to share some roads with motor vehicles and thereby introducing conflict with motorists.

TfL has acknowledged that after analysis of the routes announced today, 75 per cent of the planned length runs along what it describes as “main roads” where it says, “we’d want them to be substantially segregated.” The other 25 per cent, it says “would be high-quality direct routes on back streets.”

So, neither a Cycle Superhighway nor a Quietway, perhaps, but some kind of hybrid of the two, without a specific name?

We’re looking forward to seeing full details of the proposed designs of the routes, and past experience shows that once they are made public, campaigners will scrutinise them closely to ensure they are fit for purpose.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

18 comments

Avatar
Bill H | 6 years ago
4 likes

"Design work" well paint me cynical but I expect to see fortunes spent on consultants but not a single centimetre of properly segregated path built. I would love to be proved wrong.  

 Sadiq's failure to make a decision about the gates in Regents Park does not bode well for this announcement. 

Avatar
matthewn5 replied to Bill H | 6 years ago
0 likes

Bill H wrote:

 Sadiq's failure to make a decision about the gates in Regents Park does not bode well for this announcement. 

The roads around Regent's Park belong to City of Westminster and the gates themselves belong to the Royal Parks. The Mayor of London cannot order them closed.

We should direct our pressure on pro-motoring anti-cycling dinosaurs like the Royal Parks and City of Westminster.

But maybe your comment was political rather than suggesting a practical course of action.

Avatar
Username | 6 years ago
3 likes

Don't get excited folks, the operative word here is "design work will start"

 

Which is a euphemism for 'we'll have a think about it'.

 

Nothing to see here, nada.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Username | 6 years ago
1 like

Username wrote:

Don't get excited folks, the operative word here is "design work will start"

Which is a euphemism for 'we'll have a think about it'.

Nothing to see here, nada.

Maybe not quite nothing but certainly nothing much. Proof of the pudding, etc.

Let's hope there's evidence on the ground by election time - but it's not looking good.

Avatar
Awavey replied to Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
3 likes

Duncann wrote:

Username wrote:

Don't get excited folks, the operative word here is "design work will start"

Which is a euphemism for 'we'll have a think about it'.

Nothing to see here, nada.

Maybe not quite nothing but certainly nothing much. Proof of the pudding, etc.

Let's hope there's evidence on the ground by election time - but it's not looking good.

 

well the way its been announced and the phrase "record levels of investment" gets repeated twice,yet they are just announcing the drawing of lines on a map and probably spending years consulting with more Westminster council types, kind of makes me think by election time he'll be blaming the government, Boris, Gilligan etc etc that it hasnt delivered anything

Avatar
Username replied to Awavey | 6 years ago
2 likes

Awavey wrote:

 

well the way its been announced and the phrase "record levels of investment" gets repeated twice,yet they are just announcing the drawing of lines on a map and probably spending years consulting with more Westminster council types, kind of makes me think by election time he'll be blaming the government, Boris, Gilligan etc etc that it hasnt delivered anything

 

But £175m will have been spent on consultants, a bit like £40m was spent on them over the Garden Bridge and not a spade lifted. I must get into infrastructure consulting.

Avatar
Bluebug replied to Awavey | 6 years ago
1 like
Awavey wrote:

Duncann wrote:

Username wrote:

Don't get excited folks, the operative word here is "design work will start"

Which is a euphemism for 'we'll have a think about it'.

Nothing to see here, nada.

Maybe not quite nothing but certainly nothing much. Proof of the pudding, etc.

Let's hope there's evidence on the ground by election time - but it's not looking good.

 

well the way its been announced and the phrase "record levels of investment" gets repeated twice,yet they are just announcing the drawing of lines on a map and probably spending years consulting with more Westminster council types, kind of makes me think by election time he'll be blaming the government, Boris, Gilligan etc etc that it hasnt delivered anything

I think all the routes under consultation cleverly involve councils who aren't hostile to having cycle lanes in their patch unlike Westminster. In fact most of them will have bid for and failed to get TFL funding to have cycle intrastructure in their boroughs.

Avatar
McHackety | 6 years ago
0 likes

"Encouraging more Londoners to cycle", 5 out of 6 are north of the River. Nice, real nice.

Can we stop talking about CS4 and actually get it done...

Avatar
Jem PT replied to McHackety | 6 years ago
3 likes

McHackety wrote:

5 out of 6 are north of the River. Nice, real nice.

And 4 out of 6 are in east London - I wonder where his core vote was? ...

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Jem PT | 6 years ago
0 likes

Jem PT wrote:

McHackety wrote:

5 out of 6 are north of the River. Nice, real nice.

And 4 out of 6 are in east London - I wonder where his core vote was? ...

Not sure what you mean by his "core vote" but there would seem to be a good case for those routes. Hackney is already the top borough for cycling to work so there's demand; there's lots of growth at Canary Wharf and connections from the north aren't good; and I'm sure Dalston to Lea Bridge has become a popular hipster cycle route in recent years.

Maybe by "core vote" you mean Muslims, and there are certainly plenty in east London - but I doubt they're particularly keen on new cycle routes. I don't see many cyclists who appear to be of south Asian heritage - perhaps the new routes will encourage more?

Young, white, middle-class hipsters - who are probably also generally Labour voters, and who have been moved to east London in droves - will be pleased though.

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
1 like

frogg wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, when your bike is stolen, it's because

- was not properly locked,
- bad lock,
- not enough locks
- not properly insured,
- ha, you've lost invoice,
- you are imprudent,
- your bike draws too much attention,
- you can go walking,
- etc etc

 

But, it's not because the police/justice/system doesn't care an inch about the millions of bikes stolen each year, no no no ;

Quite the contrary, it's all benefit, you have to:

- buy a new bike,
- insure it properly,
- buy multiple locks,
- ...

Put it another way ; if it had to be stopped , it would be a long time ago.

Erm, was this meant for another thread?

Avatar
frogg | 6 years ago
0 likes

Deleted

Avatar
Zebulebu | 6 years ago
2 likes

Still absolutely fuck all from South London then. The A23 is the most horrendous route imaginable to cycle on from Croydon to Brixton. Gets a bit better from Brixton onwards (due to the spacious bus lane) but prior to that it's grim. I used to do it (Reigate to Oxford St) - I think central London is preferable to that Streatham - Brixton corridor!

Avatar
AfterPeak replied to Zebulebu | 6 years ago
3 likes

Zebulebu wrote:

Still absolutely fuck all from South London then. The A23 is the most horrendous route imaginable to cycle on from Croydon to Brixton. Gets a bit better from Brixton onwards (due to the spacious bus lane) but prior to that it's grim. I used to do it (Reigate to Oxford St) - I think central London is preferable to that Streatham - Brixton corridor!

 

I have done that route for about 6 years. Would help if anyone actually had a driving licence and a car with both working headlights. O and parking lights dont count as having your lights on!

Avatar
Bluebug replied to Zebulebu | 6 years ago
0 likes
Zebulebu wrote:

Still absolutely fuck all from South London then. The A23 is the most horrendous route imaginable to cycle on from Croydon to Brixton. Gets a bit better from Brixton onwards (due to the spacious bus lane) but prior to that it's grim. I used to do it (Reigate to Oxford St) - I think central London is preferable to that Streatham - Brixton corridor!

The Mayor is clearly scared of Croydon and Lambeth councils.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 6 years ago
7 likes

Make 'em wide. Make 'em direct. Make 'em with drainage. Please!

Avatar
rct | 6 years ago
2 likes

I can guarentee that the Wembley to Willesden Junction route will not be the most direct, but will detour through side roads avoiding the Harrow Road.  May as well stick to the Grand Union tow path.

Avatar
brooksby | 6 years ago
5 likes

Don't hold your breath, people...  When is Mr Khan up for re-election?

Latest Comments