Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Chris Froome: "I haven't broken any rules"

Tour de France and Vuelta champion responds after yesterday's news of adverse analytical finding...

Chris Froome insists he has not “broken any rules” in response to yesterday’s revelation that he had twice the permitted limit of the anti-asthma drug Salbutamol when tested at the Vuelta in September.

The Team Sky rider won the race, becoming just the third rider to have won the Spanish Grand Tour and the Tour de France in the same year, and the first since the Vuelta moved to its current late-season slot.

Speaking to the BBC, Froome said: "I understand this comes as a big shock to people. I certainly haven't broken any rules here."

Yesterday, the Guardian and French newspaper Le Monde revealed that the 32-year-old had returned an adverse analytical finding after he was tested on Stage 18 of the Vuelta.

> Chris Froome faces ban and losing Vuelta title after failed drugs test

Statements from Team Sky and the UCI following publication of the newspapers’ articles confirmed the result of the test, taken on 7 September.

Froome’s A and B samples both showed that he had 2,000 nanograms per millilitre of Salbutamol in his urine, double the level permitted under World Anti-Doping Agency rules.

The drug is not banned outright, but with the test returning a result beyond the levels that are allowed, Froome now has to prove somehow that he kept to permitted dosage and explain why the reading was so high.

Should he fail to satisfy the authorities, it is likely that he will be stripped of his Vuelta title and receive a ban.

Froome told the BBC: "I can understand a lot of people's reactions, especially given the history of the sport. This is not a positive test.

"The sport is coming from a very dark background and I have tried to do everything through my career to show that the sport has turned around."

He continued: "I have been a professional cyclist now, treating my symptoms and racing with asthma, for 10 years.

"I know what those rules are, I know what those limits are and I have never been over those limits.

"I have got a very clear routine when I use my inhaler and how many times. I have given all that information to the UCI to help get to the bottom of it."

In a statement released by Team Sky yesterday, Froome said that his dosage of the drug, which he takes via an inhaler, was increased on the advice of a team doctor in the days before the test that gave rise to his adverse analytical finding.

He told the BBC that during the race, he said to journalists that he was in a good condition because he didn’t want his rivals to know he was struggling,

"I am racing against guys who are looking for any kind of weakness," he said.

"I am not going to admit through a Grand Tour that 'yes. I am suffering with something', because the next day my rivals will come out absolutely swinging."

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

41 comments

Avatar
Rapha Nadal | 6 years ago
1 like

I'm pretty sure that there's a rule that says you can't have any more than X amount of medicine in your system.  Which appears to have been broken.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Rapha Nadal | 6 years ago
0 likes
Rapha Nadal wrote:

I'm pretty sure that there's a rule that says you can't have any more than X amount of medicine in your system.  Which appears to have been broken.

This was included in the UCI statement.

“The presence in urine of salbutamol in excess of 1000 ng/mL or formoterol in excess of 40 ng/mL is presumed not to be an intended therapeutic use of the substance and will be considered as an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) unless the Athlete proves, through a controlled pharmacokinetic study, that the abnormal result was the consequence of the use of the therapeutic dose (by inhalation) up to the maximum dose indicated above.”

So it appears Froome is sort of right.

He won't be deemed to have definitely broken the rule until after the pharmacokinetic study.

Avatar
turboprannet | 6 years ago
4 likes

take a load of salbutamol to drop the weight in the winter while altitude training, donates a bag and has it reinfused during the Vuelta...pop.

Tell everyone it's for your asthma and not to be so harsh to asthmatics etc etc. nothing to see here.

Avatar
Onemanpeloton | 6 years ago
0 likes

I'm a big Froome fan and I really hope he's innocent. But.....

He said that he was suffering with particularly accute symptoms in this particular case, and hence upped his dosage. Now, being in a team of marginal gains where every small detail matters and every tiny difference could win a race, why was Froome not already taking the maximum permitted amount of salbutamol? 

 

 

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid | 6 years ago
0 likes

If you're not on the dope, you won't cope.

Avatar
LastBoyScout | 6 years ago
4 likes

"Chris Froome insists he has “broken any rules” in response to yesterday’s revelation that he had twice the permitted limit of the anti-asthma drug Salbutamol when tested at the Vuelta in September."

Does anyone ever proof read anything on this site before submitting it?

Avatar
Grahamd replied to LastBoyScout | 6 years ago
1 like

LastBoyScout wrote:

"Chris Froome insists he has “broken any rules” in response to yesterday’s revelation that he had twice the permitted limit of the anti-asthma drug Salbutamol when tested at the Vuelta in September."

Does anyone ever proof read anything on this site before submitting it?

Give them a break, it's probably just an unconscious bias ...

 

Avatar
flat4 replied to LastBoyScout | 6 years ago
0 likes

LastBoyScout wrote:

"Chris Froome insists he has “broken any rules” in response to yesterday’s revelation that he had twice the permitted limit of the anti-asthma drug Salbutamol when tested at the Vuelta in September."

Does anyone ever proof read anything on this site before submitting it?

 

As I understand it, the part you quoted is actually correct. The regulation is that you can't take more than X amount of Salbutamol and they will test your urine and expect if to be under Y if you haven't overdosed.

 

"Expect" is the key word, hence the requirement for him to prove that despite the high reading he didn't take more than allowed.

If the rule was no more than Y in your urine test then he'd be in trouble, but that is not exactly the case here.

Avatar
ColT replied to flat4 | 6 years ago
2 likes

Look again.

"Chris Froome insists he has “broken any rules...

Avatar
alansmurphy | 6 years ago
0 likes

Which stage was it he admitted struggling on?

 

Avatar
kil0ran replied to alansmurphy | 6 years ago
0 likes

alansmurphy wrote:

Which stage was it he admitted struggling on?

 

The test was the day after the Los Muchachos (sp?) stage where Nibbles took 40 seconds out of him on those insane concrete ramps.

Big % ramps seem to be a weak point for him, same thing happened on the Bottlegate stage in the TdF

Pages

Latest Comments