Italy’s supreme court has ruled that Marco Pantini was not murdered, bringing an end to his parents’ long-running legal battle to try and establish that his death had been at the hands of others.
Pantani, who in 1998 was the last man to win the Giro d’Italia and Tour de France in the same season, died in a hotel room at the age of 34 in Rimini on St Valentine’s Day 2004.
His parents claimed that persons unknown had forced him to take a lethal dose of cocaine, but a judge in Rimini last year ruled that his death was not due to murder but rather suicide or accidental overdose.
> Judge says Marco Pantani “wasn’t murdered” as investigation closed
They appealed to Italy’s highest court La Corte di Cassazione in Rome, which has now upheld the lower court’s finding that foul play was not involved, although the full reasons for the decision have not yet been published, reports Il Resto del Carlino.
Italy’s chief state prosecutor, Paolo Giovagnoli, requesting the supreme court to archive the case for once and for all, said there was not a shred of evidence to suggest that foul play had been involved in Pantani’s death.
He spoke of the thoroughness of the investigation into Pantani’s death, with police managing to track down and bring to justice the dealer who had sold the ex-cyclist the fatal dose of cocaine, and accused his family of wanting to re-write history and deny the truth.
The court agreed, and besides having now exhausted all avenues of appeal, Pantani’s family will also have to bear the legal costs of the case.
5 thoughts on “Italy’s supreme court rules Marco Pantani was not murdered”
I blame Lance Armstrong.
I blame Lance Armstrong.
Yorkshire wallet wrote:
All joking aside there are no winners, arguable the greatest athletes performing at their unlimited best, Ventoux 2000 for instance.
Unfortunately the sport, the organisations which supported their behaviour and the journalists which followed them spat on their achievements vilified them to save their own skins making new heroes in the process and now 20 years later…nothing has changed Wiggins is a drug cheat and the sport is still dirty.
How do you know Wiggins is a
How do you know Wiggins is a drug cheat ? How easy it is to sit at home and take pleasure in spouting bile at people without a shred of proof . You speak as if you have positive proof of Mr Wiggins guilt , have you? If so can we expect to see such in the media in the next few days ? Will you be passing this information to the relevent authority ? I will not hold my breath , I suspect , as always , you are putting two and two together and in this case making seven , why do you not seek out Mr Wiggins and accuse him to his face ? Then at least you would gain some relevance.
Conspiracy theories are
Conspiracy theories are boring.
Idolizing dead people is boring.
Unproven accusations are boring.
Leviathan wrote:
so you’re saying it all points towards Jan Ulrich?