Joanna Rowsell Shand says that British Cycling is "one of the best” sport's governing bodies in terms of equality, despite recent accusations of bullying and sexism.
Rowsell Shand told BBC Sport: "My experience of British Cycling did not reflect that."
It’s not the first time she has dissented - last year she expressed ‘surprise’ at Jess Varnish’s complaints about sexist comments from technical director Shane Sutton.
But she added that she "did not want to dismiss anybody's accusations" and "everybody should be taken seriously".
"The sport of cycling internationally still has some huge inequalities between men and women - and that is the same across many sports," she told BBC Sport.
"But I think British Cycling is probably one of the best governing bodies in the world at trying to promote equality between men and women.
"We would not have won what we won if we had not had the support from British Cycling so for me I honestly feel that my medal was worth the same as the men's equivalent.”
We recently reported how Rowsell Shand has now retired from competitive cycling ages 28, having won Olympic gold in the team pursuit in 2012 and 2016.
"No organisation is perfect but I think you should strive for perfection," Rowsell Shand said.
"British Cycling have already done a 39-point plan of areas they want to improve on which I think it very proactive.
"I think if somebody feels that they've been bullied it's very easy for somebody else to think it was just banter, but I think these things should be absolutely taken really seriously," she said.
Add new comment
7 comments
BC definitely upset a lot of people posting here
so the accusation was about systemic discrimination and the slaphead here (it's just banter) thinks it's about what one person says to another?
"It's just a joke/bantz; don't take it so seriously ", has said every bully ever... I'm sorry, Joanna, but just because you weren't bullied doesn't mean it didn't happen.
The "I'm sorry, Joanna, but" makes that sound slightly like mansplaining?
I hope you didn't just assume someone's gender.
Erm, OK; so should I have said, "The fact that one person in a team did not experience bullying does not mean that nobody on the team experienced bullying."
My apologies that I used a standard English conversational form in an informal internet environment: no offence was intended, so please accept my apologies if offence was caused.
But she didn't say that. In fact, she said pretty much the exact opposite: "I think if somebody feels that they've been bullied it's very easy for somebody else to think it was just banter, but I think these things should be absolutely taken really seriously".