Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cycling mentioned in Treasury's National Infrastructure Plan - ONCE in 113 pages

Document outlines more than £500 billion investment pipeline

The government has come under attack from cycling campaigners this Easter weekend over the lack of money provided to implement the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS) – but a key document released prior to the Bank Holiday gave a hint of what was to come, with just one mention of people on bike, or on foot for that matter, in its 113 pages.

The document in question is the National Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2016-2021, which according to HM Treasury “brings together all of the government’s infrastructure priorities over the next five years.”

It also incorporates the National Infrastructure Pipeline, which outlines a planned investment of £450 billion during that period and beyond in “over 600 major projects and programmes across the UK,” as well as “£58 billion of public investment for housing and regeneration, education, health and justice.”

Included in those figures are £15 billion earmarked for building or improving major roads in England, and national cyclists’ charity CTC urged at the weekend that more of that money should be earmarked for cycling, with Highways England having outlined earlier this year its £100 million plan to “cycle proof” the Strategic Road Network.

> Highways England's Cycling Strategy short on detail and funds

CTC, which lobbied successfully along with others for the inclusion the CWIS in last year’s Infrastructure Act, said at the weekend that the planned £300 million spend on cycling in England at the weekend meant that “English cycle use would eventually reach Dutch levels by the start of the 23rd century, while its funding allocations mean even slower progress.”

> Government’s cycling strategy falls flat without funding

British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman said that the CWIS, which has entered an eight-week consultation, “won’t be worth the paper it’s written on” and accused Prime Minsiter David Cameron of “reneging on the ‘cycling revolution’ he promised us three years ago.”

He added: “If the government won’t commit to £10 per head every year, this strategy is stalling before it’s even got started.”

To save you from wading through the 113 pages of the National Infrastructure Plan to find that reference to cycling, we’ve done it for you.

On page 28, setting out the eight key objectives of Highways England during ‘Road Period 1’ – that’s from 2015 to 2020 – it lists one of those as “helping cyclists, pedestrians and other vulnerable users of the SRN [Strategic Roads Network].”

But with planned spending on cycling in England, other than London, standing at £1.39 per person per year, compared to the minimum £10 campaigners have called for, not with bundles of cash, it seems.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
IanW1968 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Quite a few people own more than one car so whilst it is a sizable number the statement most people do not own a car is true. 

Whats more when practical alternatives are provided (or at least not excluded) car ownership falls. 

Commercial interest is the dominant factor in the UK and this year is developing as a post recession peak for car sales due to low fuel prices and our inventive finance packages. 

Its like that league of gentleman sketch when the two soldiers look at their hats with skull and crossbones and ask the question "are we the bad guys" ? 

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to IanW1968 | 8 years ago
1 like

IanW1968 wrote:

Quite a few people own more than one car so whilst it is a sizable number the statement most people do not own a car is true.

..expect that wasn't the original statement but, yes indeed, a good proportion of people own more than one vehicle. That was part of why I said it might not be a majority.

IanW1968 wrote:

Whats more when practical alternatives are provided (or at least not excluded) car ownership falls. 

Indeed, although that doesn't appear to be the point being argued.

Avatar
Jacobi | 8 years ago
7 likes

Companies with links to the Tory government have won £1.5 billion worth of NHS contracts - 75 Tory lords are connected to private health firms - 70 MPs have links with private healthcare companies.

Only when bike shops offer them the same  financial return will we see any real investment in cycling in the UK.

Avatar
therevokid | 8 years ago
2 likes

surprised ? ..... not ...  2

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 8 years ago
1 like

But that's true of other countries too, that have awesome cycling infrastructure. I'm always stumped at why the UK seems so crap at sorting it out.

Avatar
IanW1968 | 8 years ago
5 likes

Switch to whoever you like,  governments work for car makers, financiers, road builders and energy companies,  all business that keep the UK shares ticking along nicely. 

So there is more chance of George Osbourne and DC moving to Rochdale and setting up a Chicken shop than there is any decent investment in cycling infrastructure or making it a transport option for anyone but extremists willing to risk life and limb. 

 

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 8 years ago
5 likes

I notice it seems to be CTC who stand up for cyclists and lobby government a lot on cycling infrastructure. What do British Cycling do towards it? I don't do any racing and am wondering if I should switch to CTC instead as I strongly believe in infrastructure improvements.

Latest Comments