A new study says that smoking a joint – or three – of cannabis does not affect the ability of regular users of the drug to ride a bicycle.
Led by Dr Benno Hartung of the University Clinic in Düsseldorf, researchers had the 14 participants in the study – 12 men and two women – ride around an obstacle course.
Each undertook a number of rides on the course, the first sober, the others after smoking one, two or three joints, reports the Smell the Truth blog on the San Francisco Chronicle’s SF Gate website.
For each puff of the joint, they were required to inhale for four seconds then hold their breath for a further 10 seconds.
They had points deducted for riding errors such as ignoring red traffic signals, hitting obstacles and going off course, enabling researchers to draw up a score for each run.
The study, published in the International Journal of Legal Medicine, concluded: “Hardly any coordinative disturbances could be detected under the influence of high or very high THC concentrations.
“Only a few driving faults were observed even under the influence of very high THC concentrations … On average, there is no increase in the number of demerits after the cannabis consumption.”
However, the study’s authors underlined that participants were regular cannabis users and that the research suggested habitual users have a different response to THC than those who do not use the drug.
“A defined THC concentration that leads to an inability to ride a bicycle cannot be presented,” they said.
“The test subjects showed only slight distinctive features that can be documented using a medical test routinely run for persons under suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.”
Last May we reported on two other studies led by Dr Hartung that assessed the ability of people to ride a bike while under impaired – one when drunk, the other while hungover.
> Study: Men safer in the saddle than women when extremely drunk
> Riding the morning after: How safe is hungover cycling?
14 thoughts on “Study: Smoking joints doesn’t affect regular cannabis users’ cycling ability”
Problem is it will inevitably
Problem is it will inevitably be leapt on by motoring organisations. Do we really need more drugged up motorists on the roads?
My own experience is that you
My own experience is that you sober up pretty quick once you start cycling. Within 5 minutes in fact. Maybe it’s got something to do with your circulation/CV system increasing due to effort…
Timed runs on an off-road
Timed runs on an off-road downhill course may well produce different results…
charliemac74 wrote:
I used to work for a famous mtb manufacturer in the west coast of Canada many years ago. A lot of the tech’s were utter stoners who liked nothing better to ride up the North Shore mountains behind Vancouver, get absolutely caned on prime BC skunk and then descend down the 3000ft mountain back home.
Not for the feint hearted. Or the sensible…
Bicycles did show a marked
Bicycles did show a marked increase in tendency to stop suddenly at cake shops though, although this was difficult to quantify fully due to the already high levels of cake required by cyclists in general.
Surely many who think it’s ok
Surely many who think it’s ok to smoke weed or don’t smoke weed yet will be wondering does it make you go faster ?
Is this a banned substance by the UCI ?
Probably best keeping to the lemon drizzle cake addiction.
Don’t forget some of the
Don’t forget some of the bravest, most effective and most decorated soldiers in Vietnam were as high as a kite most of the time. A little grass didn’t stop them running towards the excitement.
mike the bike wrote:
In WWII Russian and German tank crews and infrantry were often drunk.
In the Royal Navy the daily rum ration continued until after WWII.
There’s a reason that people in the army and navy were deliberately given alcohol.
On the other hand, the only pilots routinely given alcohol before combat were Japanese kamikaze pilots.
Can you see where I’m going with this or do you want me to spell it out?
Not sure what the point of
Not sure what the point of the study was. It seems a little facile and simplistic. Being in charge of a bicycle whilst under the influence whether stoned or drunk can be exhilarating or scary. However if coordination is affected usually only one person suffers. You. A car driver under the influence is potentially a lethal weapon.
Hmm, research on drivers
Hmm, research on drivers shows that cannabis use slows reaction times and also affects the ability to judge distances correctly.
If you drink/smoke weed/lick
If you drink/smoke weed/lick toads and then cycle you are a twat. Only smoked weed and drove once and as previous post says, I could tell I wasn’t sharp at all (blunted!) and never did it again.
Cycling is safest when you’re on the ball, not impaired. No use crying about driving standards if you can’t live by the ones you set for other people.
Yorkshire wallet wrote:
False equivalence?
Being impaired whilst driving puts other people at risk, whereas being impaired whilst cycling typically puts yourself at risk (obviously there are edge cases where a cyclist kills babies or somesuch).
I’ve certainly cycled under the influence and to be honest I tend to take more risks when I’m sober and have definitely performed more risky maneouvres. However, I did scrape my hand on a wall once when I was very drunk and unicycling home.
Acid test. Would you be OK if
Acid test. Would you be OK if you saw the surgeon who was about to operate on you sharing a spliff with the aneasthetist in the scrub room as you are wheeled into theatre?
Mungecrundle wrote:
Depends on the procedure. If it was an everyday operation like an ingrown toenail, then I wouldn’t necessarily be worried and I’d be more concerned if I saw them chugging a pint of espresso and had shaking hands. The worst would be a surgeon that looked nervous.