Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Birmingham's Cycle Revolution will cause traffic chaos, warns council's Tory opposition leader

CTC council chair says Robert Alden doesn't "get" cycling as councillor calls for money to be spent on off-road routes...

The leader of the Conservative opposition on Birmingham City Council says believes the West Midlands city’s ‘Cycle Revolution’ will lead to greater congestion for motorists – and says the council should focus on measures to keep cyclists away from main roads.

Councillor Robert Alden said that plans to put separated cycle lanes along streets such as Hagley Road in Edgbaston as part of a £60 million investment in cycling in the city will not encourage more people onto bikes, reports the Birmingham Post.

He maintains that the Labour-controlled council would be better-off investing in upgrading routes such as those in parks or on canal towpaths to keep bicycles off the road.

However a Labour cabinet member insisted the council was committed to getting people out of cars and onto other modes of transport, while the chair of CTC's national council says Councillor Alden does not “get” cycling as a mode of transport rather than a leisure activity.

Birmingham has been one of the principal beneficiaries of the Cycle City Ambition scheme operated by the Department for Transport.

It received a grant of £22 million earlier this month, on top of £17 million awarded in August 2012. Local match funding will take the total spent on cycling to more than £60 million.

The money is being spent on realising the council’s Cycle Revolution, which aims to increase modal share of cycling to 10 per cent over two decades and includes a set of cycle routes radiating from the city centre.

According to the 2011 Census, the city has the lowest proportion of cycle commuters of any major city in England, at 1.44 per cent of adults, with the figure almost unchanged since 2001. The shorter term aim is to achieve modal share for cycling of 5 per cent within a decade.

But Councillor Alden said: "This could cause serious congestion by taking away road space. Particularly as we haven't the best public transport system.

"We should remove road space after we have got the public transport, like the Metro, in place. Most people currently driving around are not going to switch to bikes."

He also said that focusing on main routes, which according to council figures will account for half of the money being spent, was a mistake.

"Those people going less than a mile are not using arterial routes, they are going around local centres," he claimed.

But one Labour cabinet member said the city had to rethink its transport priorities due to the failure of previous policies favouring motor vehicles to bring about change.

Councillor James McKay, who is cabinet member for social cohesion, equalities and community safety, said: "The basic principle is that, if you increase road capacity, especially at a time of a recovering economy, that road capacity will quickly fill and then you will have the same problem.

"What you need to do is try to shift to other modes of transport."

Meanwhile, Councillor Tahir Ali, cabinet member for development, transport, and the economy, added: "No-one is more pro-motorist than me but we have to acknowledge that, if you let the growth in cars continue at the rate it is without taking action, then this city will be gridlocked very soon."

Professor David Cox, who chairs national cyclists’ charity CTC and is a former chair of South Birmingham Primary Care Trust said: "The comments are extremely disappointing. I would ask why, if David Cameron and Boris Johnson get cycling, Councillor Alden does not?

"He seems to be of the kind who think cycling should be some kind of leisure activity in the countryside rather than something for people who want to get somewhere.

"It's not just about cycling - it's about getting people away from cars before we all choke," he added.

In November, secretary of state for transport Patrick McLoughlin visited the city to help launch its Birmingham Connected initiative, summarised in the video below, which underpins its ambition to shed its “Motor City” image and become Britain’s “leading green city.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

20 comments

Avatar
severs1966 | 9 years ago
0 likes

"keep bicycles off the road"

This is what most drivers think. It is not just a tory political position. This is why many of them will take action to ram you off the road.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to severs1966 | 9 years ago
0 likes
severs1966 wrote:

"keep bicycles off the road"

This is what most drivers think.

Here’s some more evidence to support your claim. See comment by SD in particular.

Avatar
Wolfshade | 9 years ago
0 likes

I used to cycle along the Hagley road and I didn't think it was too bad, but then I suppose that is the issue, we end up thinking things aren't too bad rather than thinking that things are good. Certainly, I wouldn't have liked to learn my road craft on it though.

There are really two ways to get people cycling, you can either incentivise it to make it seem like the best option, I mean Birmingham City Council have an app that you can log your miles and gain points for (and what do points make, prizes!), certainly infrastructure has a lot to play. The other option is to make the car journeys terrible to dissuade people to drive.

It is a weird reality that cars will still in a queue for longer than my entire commute is and yet they stay in their metal boxes, even when the car and I reach the start of the queue at the same time I still arrive in the city centre before them and that is without pushing on too hard.

The simple trouble is that Birmingham Council has little to no idea of what good cycling infrastructure is. Cycle paths that where they meet roundabouts you can only go left. Street furniture in the middle of paths. The idea of infrastructure is shared use pathways, but doing nothing to give the bike the priority over minor junctions or to the pavement surface to make them more traversable. They consider cyclists just to be a form of pedestrian.

Avatar
pablo | 9 years ago
0 likes

The guy has a bit of a point on th Hagley Road. I'm not sure how they could modify the road to be acceptable to cycle along. To put this in context for people it is a 4 lane very narrow road with buses constantly stopping lots of turnings and cross roads. If a bus is on the inside with a car in lane 2 the car has to straddle the centre line to pass its that narrow. Reducing it down to 2 lanes would increase traffic but that would probably be acceptable to cyclists unfortunately that is already planned for the Tram system last I heard. I hate driving down it I don't think I'd be brave enough to ride down it.

Avatar
Pub bike | 9 years ago
0 likes

The thing that “causes serious congestion” is cars.

Here’s some typical congestion on the route of my journey earlier today courtesy of google maps.

What is visible here is lots of cars parked on top of painted on images of bikes on the road, whilst cyclists try and squeeze past the cars that are stuck there. It would be nice if there were even some dashed lines to make motorists give cyclists (who are also trying to get to work by the way) some room instead of randomly positioning themselves so that they can see round the bend or flirt with the person in the car in front or whatever.

My 5.3 mile journey today according to Google should take 31 minutes by bike. By car “in current traffic" at 10:30am 35 minutes. It would take even longer by car at 8.30am.

Yawn.

Avatar
nigel_s | 9 years ago
0 likes

Forget the current generation. They are entrenched in automobile dependency and won't change now. We build for the youngsters. Get the infrastructure right for them and it'll be right for when they're grown up into accepting bike transport as the norm, and for everyone that follows - their kids and grandkids.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes

Canal towpaths and parks are not more than a small part of the solution. Not everyone lives right by a park or a canal, so what about the (large) parts of a journey before and after the park/canal?

Plus, canal towpaths often have gravel surfaces, so aren't suitable for all bikes; and they're slow, with steps, narrow sections by bridges, and pedestrians to negotiate. Finally, to persuade people out of their cars, cycle paths need to be visible.

To be fair to some Conservatives, they are surprisingly enlightened when it comes to cycling. However, there are a few Birmingham Conservatives around Harborne and Edgbaston who are utterly blinkered, and appear to have a visceral hatred of bikes and the people who ride them. Logic doesn't seem to come into it - the fact that their arguments are idiotic won't make them change their minds. Thankfully, they are gradually becoming a tiny and irrelevant minority.

Avatar
Chuck replied to HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Canal towpaths and parks are not more than a small part of the solution. Not everyone lives right by a park or a canal, so what about the (large) parts of a journey before and after the park/canal?

Absolutely, this argument always seems akin to suggesting that drivers already have motorways so why don't they just use those?

Avatar
hallamhash | 9 years ago
0 likes

Just stop it Birmingham. Give someone else the outrageous funds you're pissing up the wall.

Avatar
adtaylor | 9 years ago
0 likes

The traffic in Brum is very reason I started cycling! My journey to work is 35 mins by car or 15 mins by bike. It also has the benefit of saving me on fuel, parking and gym fees.

Sure, increasing cycling infrastructure will cause more congestion but that will only increase the size of the carrot that encourages cycling as a form of transport.

Standard short term thinking from brum local politicians; standard anti-bike stance from the comedy of Tory councillors. Nothing new really.

Avatar
Some Fella | 9 years ago
0 likes

Dick

Avatar
Col Nago | 9 years ago
0 likes

I commute down Hagley Road by bike and it is not pleasant. The side roads are even worse as drivers use them as rat runs. There are a handful of folks I see every day on bikes and thousands sitting in cars in traffic jams.

Birmingham needs a radical rethink on transport and this numpty councillor is stuck in the car centric past so little hope for us.

Avatar
gazza_d | 9 years ago
0 likes

Bugger should move to South Tyneside. He'd fit right in with the mindset here,which is still stuck in the 70s "build more roads to reduce congestion" rut.

Please focus on what is good and happening regarding cycling in places like Brum and not give publicity to rabid petrophiles like Alden

Avatar
2 Wheeled Idiot | 9 years ago
0 likes

This just shows the attitude issue facing the whole population.
People would rather sit in their cars in a traffic jam than walk or ride somewhere.
Okay it might take a bit longer, however you won't need to go to the gym later, also you will arrive at work more awake and happier (as long as the cars are not driven by lunatics).
Most adults would benefit from more activity to improve their fitness....this in turn will reduce obesity and CHD and diabetes and depression and the list goes on and on....
By improving the health of the population the NHS would save millions-allowing more to be spent on development and boosting the economy, improving the country as a whole.

However this won't happen because it would require people to get out their cars and off their ass to actually do something...
*rant over*  14

Avatar
Housecathst | 9 years ago
0 likes

How a Tory Councillor not "getting" cyclist is news is beyond me.

In other news today, Bear shits in the woods and the Pope is in fact Catholic, who'd of guessed.

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael replied to Housecathst | 9 years ago
0 likes
Housecathst wrote:

the Pope is in fact Catholic, who'd of guessed.

The Pope of the Coptic church, among others, isn't  26

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

Brum is not that bad to ride around if you are road savvy, if not then yeah it is a problem. I firmly believe cycling facilities should be put on main roads and not tucked away on canals etc.

The Tories in Brum remember removed Bus Lanes as of course for them the car is king which goes against the national trend in cities. for most roads they can not be expanded anyway so as car use gets more, well you will get worse anyway.

Avatar
bendertherobot | 9 years ago
0 likes

He's right, of course. Most people won't give up their cars. It doesn't matter what you provide. Because most people are still instrisically lazy. And, those who aren't, consider that they are a special case because of the school run, or the need to shop or insert excuse here.

And he's right that we do need to sort it so that we don't all choke.

So one method here might be to start cycle provision and, when all the cars are in utter gridlock, people might start to think about the alternatives.

Avatar
P3t3 replied to bendertherobot | 9 years ago
0 likes
bendertherobot wrote:

He's right, of course. Most people won't give up their cars. It doesn't matter what you provide. Because most people are still instrisically lazy. And, those who aren't, consider that they are a special case because of the school run, or the need to shop or insert excuse here.

And he's right that we do need to sort it so that we don't all choke.

So one method here might be to start cycle provision and, when all the cars are in utter gridlock, people might start to think about the alternatives.

The thing that always needs pointing out is that you don't even need wholesale adoption of cycling. Take a 5% switch from cars to bike and current congestion will evaporate. The roads tend to be optimised to high car capacity these days - its overloading them that causes congestion.

The other thing is that if you make bikes the easiest and safest feeling choice people will switch. Cars get chosen as the least worst option.

Its great they are having the debate but i hope it doesn't water down any plans so the money is wasted.

Avatar
robthehungrymonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't know Birmingham well enough, but I can say it's the worst place i've ever ridden my bike.

Latest Comments