As usual at the beginning of the year, train fare increases of up to 2.5 percent have been announced, with an average rise of 2.2 percent and the larger rises affecting many commuters into London.
What's the best way to beat the fare rises? British Cycling suggests riding to work, and says the experience of some of its members shows how the bike can help save up to £2,400 per year.
According to the Campaign for Better Transport (CBT), many commuters will pay 20-25% more for their season tickets in January 2015 than in 2010.
But British Cycling member Chris avoids £2,400 in faces by riding from Enfield to central London every day, a total of 125 miles a week.
After six months of riding instead of taking the train into work, Chris has reduced his blood pressure and cholesterol level and lost almost two stone in weight.
He said: “I’ve never had a car, but never been a ‘serious’ cyclist ether, so I was determined this year to keep it up this year and I’m pleased to say I have. I’m now planning my first cycling touring holiday for next year too as the money I’m saving I can spend on cycling too.
“The savings are great, but commuting by bike for health, fitness and the love of cycling is what really keeps me going.”
Not everyone stands to save as much money as Chris, but even a modest commuting ride can have significant financial benefits.
Julia saves £648 per year by riding instead of using public transport in Edinburgh. She started cycling to work when she lived in Germany and kept it up when she moved to Edinburgh in 2012. She specifically chose a flat from where commuting by bike would be possible. Her trip is four miles each way and is much faster and easier than getting a bus or train - and also a lot cheaper as a monthly ticket costs £54.
Julia said: “In Germany my commute by bike helped me to lose weight, so I was generally much healthier than before. It also felt great to cycle past the cars standing in slow-moving traffic.
"If people are lucky enough to have a secluded cycle path available near to them, they can catch beautiful, quiet sunrises. Also, you’ll find that you’re considered really bad-ass if you cycle in strong rain and wind although this is actually fairly normal.”
Hannah commutes from Ashton under Lyne to the outskirts of Manchester, a journey that would otherwise cost £1,500 per year. Her bike costs around £200 per year to maintain and she pockets the excess £1,300 to spend on holidays.
Hannah said: “As well as saving a lot of money and keeping fit, cycling gives you headspace and keeps you away from germs on public transport. Since I’ve taken up cycling I rarely get a cold.
“I now enjoy cycling so much that I wouldn’t take a job where I couldn’t commute by bike.”
British Cycling’s campaigns manager, Martin Key, said: “Not only is cycling to work much cheaper, it also often works out much quicker than taking the train – especially if it follows an indirect route. People who travel less than 10 miles to work should seriously consider cycling – not only will they be much fitter and healthier, they’ll also save hundreds of pounds in rail fares and even gym membership.
“Cycling is also great for making people feel good. Research has shown that cycling to work makes people less stressed and more productive. The trend for cycling to work is definitely on the increase – our membership has doubled to 100,000 in the last two years with 48% choosing to cycle to work.”
Add new comment
32 comments
'I was up to riding home a couple of times a week but I wouldn't ride in because the single shower was awful.'
All down to your mindset I'm afraid.
No shower here. commute 4-5 days per week. Baby wipes are your friend - if they can cope with meconium, they can handle a bit of sweat and road grime. Granted, it's nowhere near as pleasant as a nice hot shower after a cold ride, but if it's 'ride or no ride', you need to ask yourself how important the ride is to you...
Some interesting comments on here, good to get a proper discussion now and then.
I'm a daily commuter, covering about 50 miles a week. Not a huge distance, and so my cost savings aren't substantial but, much like everyone else, I do it to keep fit, to save time and, above all, just because I enjoy it.
I do agree with gazza_d, in terms of encouraging people to get on bikes, surely BC would be better off targetting the people that just cover a few miles by car every day, not those doing much greater distance on a train?
Cycling just a few miles a day means you don't *need* an expensive road bike or any specialist clothing, pretty much anyone can do it.
Would love to, but ain't happening from Hampshire
I do save ~£500 by cycling across central London though!
Why so much focus on monetary savings? Time saving can be as big a part of it dependant on the route you travel.
The only issue is most places don't have showers or secure bike storage. I was up to riding home a couple of times a week but I wouldn't ride in because the single shower was awful.
just want to add a comment; (note, i'm French). I'm very surprised by the transport costs in UK, here it's somewhat softer... I'm 60 and commuting 45 km each day since 6 years. My only regret is to not have begun much much earlier. I was shy about taking a bike to work!
Like many, cost is not the main reason. I spend much in equipment, for winter, rain, heat, night etc etc... I have a backup for every piece of kit. And i don't wear the same jersey all the week ... It's not Rapha but Assos, the result in the pocket is the same. It would be much cheaper by public transportation. But i don't care.
Generally, i have one day off a week, to swap clothes, do things i can't do with my bike and get some rest. I have showers at work so it's the best case.
The main benefit is i'm fit and i have a real sense of Freedom.
By bike - 24km each way. 45 mins in, 1hr 15 back.
Bit of extra scran, plus kit costs.
By train - £8 a day for a 3hr round trip. Standing.
I might not save much cash, but I save an hour per day plus I get 2hrs riding in each day during what would otherwise be 'dead time'
Gym at lunchtimes. Home by 17:30 to spend the evening with my family, having done the best part of 3hrs per day exercise. Really is a no-brainer.
I cycle ten miles into work and ten miles back again, every day.
If I was to drive in I'd take a slightly shorter route (six miles each way) but have to cross a £1 each way toll bridge. I have a free parking space at the office, and driving would be quicker at the time I go in.
A bus would also be quicker at that time, and cost about £4 per day if I bought the ticket on day of travel.
So cycling, I'm barely saving any money at all. Losing out, if I factor in the extra food I eat
But I cycle anyway.
There is another good reason for NOT dropping the gym. Gyms have showers whereas a lot of offices don't.
Laundering office clothes? Two options (Both will require you to have access to a locker).
Option one. Get to know the little independent dry cleaners near your place of work. A lot of them will deliver/collect to/from your place of work. They will also deal with your shirts/blouses or know someone who will.
Option two. Once a week do a non bike commute to restock your supply of office gear and take your dirty stuff home.
Of course if you are close to your place of work and you can cycle in in your work clothes so much the better.
Option three - carry your office clothes for the week in in a pannier or bag once per week, and take your dirty stuff home at the end of each day (or stack it up in a pannier to take home once per week).
Having moved closer to work earlier this year, my commute is now about 8 miles each way but because I can cycle rather than drive I now only fill the car up about once every 2 months, and I save £80 a month by not using the bus.
More importantly I feel so much healthier from doing an hour of exercise a day, and carrying a bag full of clothes and a laptop means the hills are good training!
I cant squat and deadlift whilst commuting to work, so I'll keep my gym membership thanks. The 300 quid I save on my small commute is soaked up in the general spend on bike bits, child trailers, etc. but I don it because its quicker, easier and more enjoyable (plus driving 2 miles 4 times a day really seems such a huge waste)
I truly don't get why more people don't commute by bike.
I think they are generally a bit thick.
Because I don't fancy a daily 130 mile round trip everyday and non folding bikes aren't allowed on commuter trains during peak times so I can't even cycle part of the way?
British Cycling is focussing on the wrong targets.
Need to get the people driving and using public transport a handful of miles out onto bikes, rather than the much smaller percentage that are commuting much longer distances by train.
That will make the biggest difference to people's lives and pocket.
I switched last year to 16ml each way by bike instead of car. It's saved me at least £100-150 per month in fuel etc, and I feel much fitter and healthier (well before Christmas anyway). It is only for the commited cyclist though.
One of the guys I regularly speak to works at same place and commutes 5 mile to save about £10 a day in bus fares. He's got a scabby mountain bike & combat shorts. No carbon, no Rapha, just money in his pocket.
There's also the issue that the saving can be very regional. It makes huge sense to commute by bike in London balanced against very very high rail costs. Even higher car costs.
My own commute, 40 miles each way, 5 days a week equates to a petrol cost of roughly £1300 per annum. Car parking is free at my workplace. So no cost there.
Sure, there's wear and tear but that's a pretty intangible thing to truly pin down.
Do I spend more than £1300 a year in cycling goodies? Good god yes. Indeed, I probably spend a large proportion EATING more.
But, I get fit, I LOVE commuting by bike and get to spend more time with the family.
Knight these people!
Can someone have a word with Hannah about her helmet please. If there is any safety benefit to be gained from wearing these things, it's probably negated by the 'protect the back of your neck and leave half your head uncovered' look.
It's not that bad, unlike some I grant you.
It does look way too big for her though. Tip: you're far more likely to hit the side of your helmet than the front, and a helmet that moves by comparison to your head doesn't help you at all. So when trying one on, see if you can push it side to side. If you can then you need a smaller size.
A well-meaning attempt to get more people on their bikes but they’re hardly going to encourage ordinary people to ride to work with a set of pictures like that.
The whole story says:
- You need to be an enthusiast
- You need specialist equipment
- You’re going to put yourself in danger (which is why you need all that safety gear)
I commute from Sheffield to Nottingham by train everyday, no way in hell I could ride that everyday....
People always talk about how much can be saved by commuting every day. And of course - that's where the biggest savings are.
But it's also worth saying that if you "take up commuting by bike" there's no compulsion to do it every day, and there's no rule that says you have to try and beat your PB every time. Last summer my commute was almost exactly 10 miles each way and easy too, and I still only did it a maximum of four times a week. Taking the train/tube/bus sometimes because you fancy a rest day or a pint after work isn't a cop-out (as long as you're not just making excuses).
My commute would typically cost £1400 a year for me to travel in via train zones 2-4 4 days a week - but I cycle instead.
There is however the cost of 1) Bike 2) Clothing 3) Maintenance. My two bikes cost well in excess of £4,500, and clothing probably adds up to about £600.
I change my chain, cables, tyres, brake pads and bottom bracket every year at a cost of about £250 per bike as I rack up over 4000 miles alone just commuting (i did 7100 miles over my two bikes in 2014).
I do try and keep my costs down as much as I can by servicing my bike myself and I have invested in some decent Park Tools.
I think it's less about how much money you save as there are still plenty of associated costs as above - it's more about fitness; my FTP has increased, I have six pack abs, I'm light and very very healthy. Money can't buy you that - that's all down to hard work on the bike..
Don't forget #outsideisfree
You change your bottom brackets every year?
I've got Hope bbs with over 10,000 miles on them and Shimano ones with around 5,000 miles and they are still going strong. I do about the same annual mileage as you.
I'll be starting my 4th year of cycling in april after converting from Vespa commuting and my net spend will be around minus £1500. If I sold the Vespa it'd be zero.
Yep I discovered Rapha...and nice shiny new bikes...but if I gave it all up today and ebayed the lot I'd be in profit but ultimately I dont care, in return I've lost (and kept off) a lot of weight...am fitter, healthier and have a new hobby to bore the wife with.
And there's not many people that would put down their commute as an enjoyable hobby
Walton on Thames to London with a Travelcard is about £3,000 for this year. With a 30 minute walk to the station I may as well include annual car parking at £800.
I save a family holiday, and more, each year.
Julia from Edinburgh seems to have a lot of nice kit for a 4 mile ride. I bet when she was in Germany the locals didn't make such an effort.
People don't care about fitness and well-being though, otherwise there wouldn't be the discussion.
Saving money on transport costs, saving time and eliminating gym memberships (saving time AND money) tick more boxes.
Cycling to work (London Zone 3 to the West End) saves me nearly £200 a month once gym membership is included in the saving. I don't even own any Rapha...
Why are people eliminating gym memberships? As a society have we really got to the stage where a gym membership is an automatic saving because there are no better ways to exercise?
This is a classic line quoted by people who drop the gym when they start commuting, what they don't mention/realise is that they've also lost all the benefits of xc and resistance training if they do nothing but cycle now.
Pages