Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Redbridge cyclists win out over NIMBY neighbours in East London cycle route row

Councillors back route preferred by local cycling campaigners despite residents' opposition...

Cyclists in North East London were given a boost last night after local councillors backed their choice of route for a major cycle way being planned in the London Borough of Redbridge, one of three options put forward to connect the Roding Valley Way from Redbridge Roundabout to Empress Avenue, Aldersbrook.

As reported on last week, the route preferred by members of the Redbridge group of the London Cycling Campaign has come under criticism from local residents in Royston Gardens, Wanstead, who claim that it would create a security risk to their houses, which the proposed route would run behind.

That led to the proposed path, known as Route A, being rejected last week by members of Redbridge Council’s Area One committee, who instead gave their support to alternative Routes B and C.

Yesterday evening, however, a majority vote by the Area Seven Committee, which represents the Cranbrook, Newbury and Valentines wards, chose Route A as the preferred option, which is also supported by half of the respondents to a public consultation on the scheme.

According to the website of the Wanstead Guardian, Redbridge LCC members support Route A because the other two choices would involve cyclists having to travel alongside the A406 North Circular Road, exposing them to traffic fumes and creating danger for riders.

LCC member Gill James, who attended yesterday evening’s meeting, told the newspaper: “We are pleased Area Seven went for route A. It is the route we want and got the most support in the consultation.”

She continued: "There was a long discussion about it (at the meeting) but they went for route A with the proviso that some kind of fence be put up at the back of the properties in Royston Gardens to protect them."

The next stage in the process is for council officials to examine Routes A and C in further detail, after which they will report their findings to the two area committees concerned.

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


OldRidgeback | 14 years ago

If anything, having a well-used cycle route behind their property will probably reduce the security threat. Our old house had an alley running behind that was poorly lit and not used often. All of the houses in the street backing onto it were broken into at some point including ours, some repeatedly. Had the alley been busy, the security would not have been an issue.

Latest Comments