- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
13 comments
Older drivers seem to have age as the reason for poor driving.
What is the excuse that younger drivers want to use for their piss poor diving?
Sad story for all involved.
There is a good case for some kind of refresher course and test for older drivers, not just of eyesight & basic skills but also of attitudes as older people began driving when drink-driving for example was more acceptable so perhaps need to be introduced to more current values
All sensible suggestions, though I'd take a world full of 73 year old drivers over the current bunch, on balance.
Also, when diagnosed with a condition requiring DVLA notification, it should be the responsibility of the doctor to inform the DVLA rather than the patient. My father in law had a dementia diagnosis and refused to acknowledge there was a problem and wouldn't stop driving even after several accidents and writing off a car.
Isn't suffering "bouts of grief" after running down and killing a friend just a normal human response? (I'd hope so, anyway...)
I saw this story and thought any comments would just be the usual internet rantings. How wrong I was. Some excellent ideas particularly Gkam84. I don't think it should be a test with reverse parking and other manoeuvres though but more an evaluation of your skills and attitudes, perhaps more like an advanced driving test.
I'm sitting lessons again after MANY years of not driving. Things have changed a bit and I'm only 30....I'd put a compulsory refresher 10 hours with an instructor in every 5-10 years and tie it in with changing your picture. So you don't pay the DVLA anything, you pay the driving instructor to do your refresher hours and boom, you are legal again. They hours can be done in the month running up to the expiry of your license.
No room for abuse there then.
Re-test ALL drivers AT LEAST every 5 years.
I drive a lot and would welcome it, it's a privilege for those who can demonstrate competence and responsibility, not a right.
Sad story this.
This is the reason we need re-testing of drivers every 5 years or so, and more often after age 60.
Sad story indeed. But from a risk perspective it would make more sense to target the retesting at younger people - or, easier yet, just raise the driving age to 25.
Do you have any idea what you are talking about??? Re-testing of older persons is what is being talked about. It is in relation to their (often) decreased ability to make constant evaluations into their actions and surroundings whilst driving a motor vehicle.
The re-testing of younger drivers??? I think what you should be saying is that the driving test should be of a sufficiently high standard that drivers enter our roads with a high level of competency in this very important skill.
Not only that but compulsory eye testing every two years for all drivers. Eilidh Cairns was killed by a truck driver shown to have eyesight so bad that he was not fit to drive (and went on to kill someone else).
Simple way to enforce this is make it a compulsory requirement for vehicle insurance.