Team Sky's decision to hold its official team launch in London has as expected caused plenty of excitement amongst cycling fans, but Sky has also had to defend itself from accusations of London bias from disgruntled supporters who can't make it to the capital for the 4th of January launch.
As we reported yesterday, anticipation of the launch has been heightened by the prospect of 300 lucky cyclists getting to ride through London’s streets alongside the likes of Bradley Wiggins, Edvald Boasson Hagen and Juan Antonio Flecha on the first Monday of the New Year.
There’s still three and a half weeks to go until Team Sky’s riders first turn their cranks for real in the Tour Down Under, but excitement is building among fans here if reaction on the team’s Facebook page of its 4 January launch in London is anything to go by.
The decision to launch in London hasn’t pleased everyone, however, with many outside the capital voicing frustration on Facebook that the team has chosen to launch there, rather than elsewhere, with Manchester understandably a popular choice given that it is where British Cycling is based.
In answer to those criticisms, Team Sky issued a statement – repeated at the end of this article – on Facebook outlining the reasons for choosing to launch in London, chief among which were logistical issues, with the capital seen as the most convenient location to bring together riders and support staff from across Europe not only for the launch itself, but also for distributing bikes and kit to riders and for onward travel to either a training camp in Spain, or the Tour Down Under.
Also, Team Sky felt that the capital was best equipped to host the planned mass participation ride, given the success of the London Skyride back in September, and that it also provided the best option in terms of media facilities. We’d have pushed the case for Bath being used as the launch venue instead, but it would be a bit of a squeeze getting everyone into road.cc towers.
Sky’s statement is shown below, and if you want to read the comments that preceded it, you can find them here on Facebook, although you need to be signed up as a fan of Team Sky to access the page:
“Many people are asking why the team launch, and the public ride are in London on 4th January. Here's a quick explanation.
Firstly, pretty much all the riders, coaches and mechanics who have to come to the launch live abroad [as it's generally easier to live in continental Europe as a pro-cyclist. Even the Brits], so London logistically offers the best transport options to return to the UK with the airports and Eurostar [don't even go there on either subject given the snow lately!]. Why not host the launch in Europe? Well, it wouldn't matter where we hosted it, 90% of the team would need to travel to get there, and we feel London is the most convenient location for everyone we need to be there to travel to (particularly on direct flights to limit air travel to only what is absolutely necessary).
Secondly, due to the public ride we needed a city conditioned to mass-rides, and our biggest Skyride public events have been in London to date. We feel comfortable knowing what does, and doesn't work in and around the central city area.
Thirdly, we needed an appropriate venue for our media engagements and although many cities admittedly offer options, London offered us the most venue options for us to select from.
Fourthly, the launch is just part of a bigger team operational meeting to distribute bikes and kit etc so, again, inbound transport hubs were key.
And, finally, following the launch the team departs to a training camp in Spain [or Tour Down Under in Adelaide for others] so, again, the best transport options were around London.
Phew! So as you can see it was a combination of reasons. Each in their own right could be argued either way, but collectively they all pointed to London. This explanation may not satisfy all of you, but hopefully you appreciate the sentiment.”
Seems sensible to me. Cycling out of town is likely to be fast and if a cyclist crashes then the helmet may be of use and save strain on emergency...
Nice of them to put an internal storage space behind the head tube, should be able to get a few gels in there!
I thought it was their bikes that had weight restrictions?
The governing body also revealed that 35 per cent of crashes during the 2024 season were caused by “unprovoked rider errors”...
At least it hasn't been filled with concrete before they can do anything with it.
Well, gosh, I did ...
I have found that the press are very quick to let us know that about the lack of helmet when there is a fatality and stubbornly quiet if one was...
Who knows? She occasionally did change her views, plus she was for more environmental regulation, held against privatising the railways for most...
Ah right, that would be an interesting case to find the result of....
Timmee can well afford the fine but it's one hell of an advert for Lime.