Lance Armstrong has this week given testimony under oath in a case in which he is being sued for $12 million in relation to bonuses paid to him for three of the Tour de France titles he was stripped of in 2012.
However, the disgraced cyclist won’t have to testify just yet in a separate case that could result in him having to pay damages of $96 million in an action initiated under whistleblower legislation by former team mate Floyd Landis that has been joined by the US government.
Yesterday, the 42-year-old gave a videotaped deposition in a case relating to SCA Promotions, a Texas-based company that had insured potential bonuses for his Tour de France victories between 2002 and 2004.
When rumours of his doping first surfaced a decade or so ago, SCA decided to withhold the bonuses but made a settlement in 2006 after Armstrong took the issue to arbitration in a case in which he also gave sworn testimony.
During the case which resulted in Armstrong winning $7.5 million, he insisted under oath that he had “never” doped, adding: "How many times do I have to say it?"
He also said: "I race the bike straight up fair and square."
A statute of limitations means that despite having confessed to doping last year, he cannot in this instance face charges of perjury.
The former US Postal rider has unsuccessfully sought to block his requirement to testify under oath in the current case, but had to do so yesterday, when he was questioned by SCA’s lawyer, Jeffrey Tillotson, reports USA Today.
Neither, Tillotson nor Armstrong’s attorney, Tim Herman, made a comment on Armstrong’s deposition after he made it, adds the newspaper, and for now his testimony is not being made public.
Armstrong’s lawyers have also sought to prevent him having to give sworn testimony in the whistleblower case brought by Landis under the False Claims Act, which relates to misuse of government funds, with his former US Postal team being backed by a state agency.
He had been due to testify on 23 June, but the as in the SCA case, his attorneys have fought to prevent him having to do so.
Judge Robert Wilkins, who is presiding over the case in Washington, DC, says he expects to issue a ruling on Armstrong’s motion to dismiss within the next week, according to Bloomberg.
When the story was first written up last night (see my screenshot below) it was already known that a man had been arrested on suspicion of causing...
Cos once they've got you hooked you'll never be clear of 'em.
It seems to me that the most likely explanation is that whoever provided that quote fails to grasp the difference between a "public right of way"...
That article is far too kind to Moses. I highly recommend reading The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Despite the title, it applies to...
Hub brakes have their own trade-offs. I actually liked the one I had for its particular application - in a "utility" bike where I didn't care...
Given that every other lime bike I see on my 1/week commute into london appears to have its rear light hanging off by the cable rather than mounted...
Go for it Pogi! I will be in the velodrome on 13th April and it would be fantastic to see him arrive.
Indeed but he's a can't. Can't be arsed to tell the truth, can't be arsed to build new Hospitals and can't be arsed to do anything for anyone save...
What wokery is this? I thought those tech-bros were there to save us from the "mind virus"?
Opposition to controversial East Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood ‘will filter away’ say council bosses...