A Daily Mail story pillorying Justine Thornton, wife of Labour leader Ed Miliband, for breaking traffic laws on her bike, actually demonstrates the "insanity" of London's roads, says a leading cycling advocate.
The Mail accuses Ms Thornton of running a red light, ignoring a 'No right turn sign' and a 'No entry' sign, riding the wrong way up a one-way street and riding on the pavement.
Some might say that all those and more are mitigated by the fact that she was being followed by a Daily Mail photographer who stalked her for two days to collect the images that illustrate the story.
But cycling advocates including GB Cycling Embassy chair Mark Treasure say Ms Thornton's route between work and home uses segments that campaign bodies and councils have intended for years to make into cycling shortcuts.
Treasure tweeted:
@nuttyxander In first pic she's "contraflowing" for 20m to avoid cycling for half a mile on the Strand gyratory pic.twitter.com/uDH264lhfP
— Mark Treasure (@AsEasyAsRiding) April 27, 2015
@nuttyxander Which only really serves to demonstrate the insanity of many roads in central London
— Mark Treasure (@AsEasyAsRiding) April 27, 2015
The simple solution here would be a protected contraflow cycling lane — there's plenty of precedent in Cambridge among other places for contraflow bike lanes — allowing riders like Ms Thornton to avoid the multi-lane one-way traffic of the Strand gyratory.
Alex Ingram of hfcyclists, the Hammersmith & Fulham branch of the London Cycling Campaign, picked up on the shot of Ms Thornton riding between a pair of 'No entry' signs at the end of Dartmouth Park Road.
Here it is on Google Streetview:
And here's the same short stretch of cobbles from the other direction:
@AsEasyAsRiding best of all is the no entry both ways route she cycles over which is a @camdencyclists quick win since 2010 known to council
— Alex Ingram (@nuttyxander) April 27, 2015
There's no reason these 'No entry' signs couldn't have 'Cycles excepted' exemption signs, though it would mean less fun for those who enjoy seeing the Mail get its knickers in a knot over nothing.
A Labour spokesman told the Mail: "Justine believes it is very important that everyone obeys the Highway Code and she will be more careful on her bike in future."
It's a pity the Labour Party didn't take the opportunity to say it would encourage London borough councils — often blockers of high-quality cycling provision — to execute some of the simple ways to make cycling faster and safer that they've known about for years.

21 thoughts on “Two days of stalking Ed Miliband’s partner gets Daily Mail a tour of London road “insanity””
Quote:Justine-Miliband-veers-
I put it to you, Mr Daily Wail, that the number of cycling laws in this country *can* be counted!
Double no-entry road would
Double no-entry road would also be a candidate for a “no motor vehicles” sign. “Except cyclists” on a no entry is really for one way roads.
I like whatever the Daily
I like whatever the Daily Mail doesn’t.
IanW1968 wrote:I like
Fair point.
But her husband’s an arse, so fair game!
Do you remember when boris
Do you remember when boris johnson did this on his first day at work? And he was in charge of transport!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-565882/Caught-camera-The-film-shows-Boris-Johnson-cycling-red-lights-failing-stop-zebra-crossing-AND-mounting-pavement.html
then his team came out with some guff “Boris feels strongly that cyclists should not jump red lights” having just, er, jumped a load of red lights.
What i dont understand though
What i dont understand though is why if you cant enter from either side why it needs double yellow lines to stop people parking.
Won’t it be because double
Won’t it be because double yellows can be enforced by council enforcement officers, whereas no entry would require a police officer?
There are plenty of cycling
There are plenty of cycling contraflows in London already too.
Get off the bike and walk
Get off the bike and walk maybe.
Beaufort wrote:Get off the
Or better still – get off the bike and take the car instead.
That pretty much sums up the cycling provision in many parts of London.
Sure it highlights the
Sure it highlights the insanity of some of London’s roads. Still doesn’t excuse it.
Much like Top Gear showing how some sports cars can stop in much less than the highway code stopping distances. Surely that means that a bit of speeding is ok, too?
Matt_S wrote:Sure it
No, it highlights the insanity of the Daily Mail. Labour cyclist breaking trivial rules – guaranteed to burst a few of their readers’ blood vessels.
Still, it must mean that none of the Mail’s journalists or their partners, or their readers or their readers’ partners ever commit trivial offences, and that’s nice to know. Otherwise they’d be hypocrites wouldn’t they?
Quote:Sure it highlights the
Does such a trifling matter require an excuse?
I suspect they followed her
I suspect they followed her through the no right turn and no entry road etc – ‘in the public interest’ of course.
“Get off the bike and walk
“Get off the bike and walk maybe.”
We don’t ask drivers to push their cars, why should cyclists have to to be safe? I’d do whatever it took to avoid that gyratory system too.
Did the fail’s stalker also follow her through? If so they also broke the law…
So, Labour leader’s wife uses
So, Labour leader’s wife uses bicycle as everyday means of transport and not just as a publicity stunt. Cool.
That no entry thing is just
That no entry thing is just bonkers.
wellsprop wrote:That no entry
If I were on the council’s highway committee I’d insist on making it one way as well.
In both directions.
B
It is one way in both
It is one way in both directions.
Much more like this are required.
“Did the fail’s stalker also
“Did the fail’s stalker also follow her through? If so they also broke the law…”
A newspaper breaking the law, don’t be ridiculous X(
What kind of idiot would
What kind of idiot would follow her or her husband?!