Ahead spacers above the stem?
Say it ain’t so Ernesto, say it ain’t so.
I’m not angry, just disappointed.

Ahead spacers above the stem?
Say it ain’t so Ernesto, say it ain’t so.
I’m not angry, just disappointed.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Well now, let's not be hasty. We should get the views of a range of audiences first. For instance, how's it gone down with readers in the Surrey area?
I can't find these on Lezyne's site, not even in among the legacy/discontinued products.
"Confusing name - "Elite" and "Pro" not meaning top end" There is method to the madness. Challenge uses "Elite" to designate second-tier tyres with intermediate thread counts. "Elites" is also the top amateur rank recognised by a few continental European federations, I believe that's the inspiration for the name. Challenge uses "Pro" to designate tyres with open tubular construction. They lie above the vulcanised tyres, that Challenge calls "Race".
Suggest you pull this article, fix it, then bin it.
@ajd As well as confusing George Orwell with Orson Wells - clearly not proof read (at least, not by a different person)
@mdavidford One assumes it's referencing Nancy Mitford's famous "Noblesse Oblige" with its concept of U and non-U language, U being upper class and non-U the more flowery attempts to sound posh from the middle classes. I recall her decreeing that bicycle and bike were U and cycle was non-U, though she was of course a little early to rule on the difference between ATB and MTB.
On the subject of mountain biking, terrific rides by Tom Pidcock and Charlie Aldridge to take gold and silver in the UCI World Championships yesterday.
Most puzzlingly: Firstly for the closing off of parentheses twice, but also, who are these people "in the U"? Is this some kind of slang the kids are using that I'm not down with?
As I recall it made cycling more popular rather than doing for it...honestly, this article is an absolute dumpster fire of factual errors (Orson Welles did not write 1984 and Warner Bros do not organise MTB races) and grammatical and syntactical mistakes ("TV coverage is also, in no short order, what rings in the lion’s share of sponsorship money" - what?). What on earth happened?
11 thoughts on “Just. Get. It. Right. #2”
Haven’t you ever heard of an
Haven’t you ever heard of an Islamic stitch?
fourstringsisplenty
No.
ah yes, but God is in the
ah yes, but God is in the details 😀
A quick couple of minutes
A quick couple of minutes with an allen key and it’ll be reet. Might even fit me then, too. Wrap it up…
it’s what you get when you’re
it’s what you get when you’re late for prayers and have to run to the Mosque
this has got me all of a
this has got me all of a fluster;
http://www.lacoste.com/
bad foot positions really annoy me, and the girl on the back is about to get her toes nicely mangled if thats a fixie!
Ooh yes, and if that girl on
Ooh yes, and if that girl on the front has her foot on a quick release there are going to be problems…
not to mention the rear two
not to mention the rear two bikes have their chainsets on the wrong side, although i think they run them on the left side on the continent, to fall in line with the driving
yes it did make me wonder …
yes it did make me wonder … wiki says left sided chainsets exist but its the first time i’ve seen one … either its some vintage french cycle or a bad bit of photoshopping?!
Photos reversed – if you go
Photos reversed – if you go into the Lacoste site and look at sportswear pages, they all seem to be right way round.
The giveaway on homepage is buttons being on the wrong side on the guy’s cardigan :B
Lacoste – an example of the
Lacoste – an example of the real world being ignored/twisted in the quest for ‘cool’, just to sell overpriced clothes. Some things never change….
(|: