The roads minister of the Australian state of New South Wales has said that he is “increasingly persuaded” that cyclists need to be licensed and also says he is considering banning bikes from some of Sydney’s roads – both measures that he claims will improve the safety of riders.
The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Duncan Gay made his remarks in response to a series of incidents in recent weeks in which cyclists have been seriously injured, as well as two fatalities in the past fortnight, the latest coming yesterday when a man was killed following a collision with a bus at Neutral Bay.
Speaking to 2UE Breakfast, Mr Gay said: “The thing I really need to look at is, if we’re going to put rules in place, and I need to be tougher on car drivers, but I am increasingly persuaded that we need to look at a licence for cyclists.
“It’s not going to worry the ones that are doing the right thing, but the bad ones that are running lights, crossing over, being aggressive, they’re a large part of the statistic,” he went on.
During March, six cyclists out on a club run on Southern Cross Drive suffered serious injuries when the group they were riding with was hit by a car.
According to Mr Gay it is possible that cyclists might be banned from such roads for their own protection, the minister saying, “We will look at it on a safety basis.”
He continued: “The hard thing is, if I put a carte blanche ban in, there are some really good rides that cyclists do, and part of it involves Southern Cross Drive and then on down to Wollongong. I understand how important this is for cyclists, but there have been a couple of accidents there.
He acknowledged that there had been a fall in the number of cyclist fatalities, “but that’s no huge solace because last year was a record year,” with 14 riders killed on the roads of New South Wales.
“We need to get people to be more careful, but the key is to get the people in bigger vehicles to understand that they need to be more observant, but the other part is we need cyclists to actually obey the rules and be helpful as well,” he added.
“Before the phones run off the hook, as I know they will, it is a very small section of cyclists that don’t do the right thing. It would be probably under one per cent,” he concluded.
Phil Ayres, the chief executive of Cycling New South Wales, told Guardian Australia that most of its 10,000 members would be “fundamentally against” attempts to require cyclists to be licensed.
“But we are an organisation that’s grown up to understand there are arguments in favour of it and we’d certainly want to be at the table with government to discuss cyclist safety,” he said.
“It’s important to realise though that licensing bike riders won’t stop them from being hit, as has happened so horrifically in recent weeks and months. Licensing isn’t a safety issue – if you magically licensed all bikes overnight, it won’t stop the accidents.”
He acknowledged that cyclists need to follow the laws of the road, but denied that law-breaking riders were a significant issue.
“There is a rogue element in any group of people in the community,” he explained. “We don’t condone any riders not obeying the road rules – everyone has to adhere to them. It’s not OK to roll through a red light.
“But the thing with cyclists is that they aren’t surrounded by tonnes of metal. What would be a fender scrape for a car is the maiming of an individual or a loss of life for a cyclist.”
In November 2009, one of Mr Gay’s predecessors as New South Wales transport minister, Carl Scully, who served in that capacity from 1996 to 2005, said that cyclists should be banned from the roads.
In the United States, only the state of Hawaii requires compulsory bike licensing, although some states, such as California, leave it to councils or cities to enforce it at local level if the so choose, as happens in Ventura County, part of the Greater Los Angeles area.
Last October, an attempt to introduce such legislation in the state of Georgia was withdrawn in the face of opposition from cyclists.
In November last year, Labour former minister Kate Hoey said that cyclists in the UK should be registered and required to pay “road tax.”




-1024x680.jpg)


















36 thoughts on “NSW roads minister says cyclists should be licensed and banned from some roads – for their own safety”
“cyclists might be banned
“cyclists might be banned from such roads for their own protection”
1) utterly ridiculous, given that 79%* of incidents are the fault of the driver in AUS,
2) Happy to blame the cyclists but cant be bothered to actually fix the problem which is to add quality infrastructure on those roads or as an alternative to those roads
* http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/fitness/blogs/on-your-bike/duncan-gays-call-to-license-cyclists-is-not-the-answer-to-road-safety-issues-20140502-37mda.html
AS LONG AS IT AINT A MOTORWAY
AS LONG AS IT AINT A MOTORWAY I’LL RIDE IT! lol
ban cyclists! whatever next, blame them when a car runs ’em over and kills them on the spot?! lol =))
sorry, I couldn’t finish
sorry, I couldn’t finish reading. I was too disgusted.
“But the thing with cyclists
“But the thing with cyclists is that they aren’t surrounded by tonnes of metal. What would be a fender scrape for a car is the maiming of an individual or a loss of life for a cyclist.”
So, it is worse to break a law if you are more vulnerable?
The whole licencing issue is a bit of a red herring. If being licencened were to magically make one safer then how come the majority of road collisions occur between licenced drivers. Moreover, look ath the % of collisions involving “professional” drivers, like LGVs etc, when compared with their total proportion of traffic flow.
If you are concerned about specific accident locations, study the location and understand why it happens, maybe jsut maybe the route cause is isn’t jsut the road users (by any means of locomotion) it is the layout of the road itself.
Banning vehicle types is a simple step that artificially solves the problem.
Licencing is a political ploy
Licencing is a political ploy pure and simple. Its attraction to politicians is that it counters the argument by ignorant petrol heads that cyclists can do what they like with impunity forgetting that’s exactly what a load of bad drivers – even banned ones do – every day with little chance of prosecution or tough sentencing.
There’s quite a few routes in
There’s quite a few routes in this country I’d happily see upgraded to full Motorway status if it was accompanied by the construction of a high quality cycle route (designed for 30mph+ velomobiles ideally!) in roughly the same alignment. Other than that, jog on.
What a prat. He hasn’t
What a prat. He hasn’t bothered to read the crash analysis of course. But there are a lot of dolts like him who believe victim blaming is the answer to road safety, and I’ve come across a lot who think that way in Australia in particular.
Of course in the UK, maybe we should support the Aussies doing this? It’ll certainly restrict Australian cycling and that’ll help keep TeamGB in its prominent position. Just joking – but maybe if someone pointed out to him his move will help ensure British cyclists will keep on beating Aussies he’d take a different tack.
Isn’t Australia largely
Isn’t Australia largely irrelevant?
It’s geographic disconnection has caused it to take some very different evolutionary paths to those travelled elsewhere in the world.
Witness the marsupials, Aussie rules, their attitude to the environment, Holden cars, and Shane Warne.
Similarly, their politicians have developed in a similarly unique and bizarre manner.
“…. part of it involves
“…. part of it involves Southern Cross Drive and then on down to Wollongong. I understand how important this is for cyclists, but there have been a couple of accidents there”
Strikes me (having grown up and ridden there; and now being an occasional visitor with a bicycle) that the problem is that when they built the Sthn Cross Drive/M1/M5 interface, particularly the bit at the western end of the runway tunnel, they simply ignored bicycles. As an aside, the runway tunnel itself if (I find) terrifying on a bike. If I am riding south I will skirt around the northern edge of the airport through Tempe to avoid it.
Australian cars are generally bigger (and older) than your average UK car and because there’s usually less traffic they are frequently travelling faster than vehicles in the UK. To compound matters, your average Australian driver tries to make up for their lack of skill (hard to believe, but the average quality of driving in Australia is considerably below that in the UK) with aggression. I find riding my bike in and around London considerably less stressful than Sydney.
he’s doing a Boris…
he’s doing a Boris… throwing a dead cat onto the table to detract from the dangerous state of his roads and the deadly driving of his motorists…
On the other hand, if every
On the other hand, if every school boy and girl was to pass a bike driving test, they would be more aware about bike safety in traffic, also later as a car driver.
Over here in Switzerland I had a cop at primary school teaching us the rules, taking us practicing several times and testing our skills driving busy roads (I got a gold medal, the only ever though…).
Quote:During March, six
and no charges yet against the driver :S
(and that should read very serious injuries)
Aussie driver like it simple – that’s my lane and the speed limit is my speed
oh and I’ve already got a license 🙂 – not checked what the biggest I can drive in Aus is but I’ve got 2tonne SUV as well as my 7kg bike
I do believe everyone making
I do believe everyone making a public statement about cycling should first be required to commute to work for a month.
pz1800 wrote:
I do believe
^ This!
Too many ignorant muppets out there that would do better shutting their pie holes about things they don’t have the first clue about.
pz1800 wrote:I do believe
Exactly……in fact lets extend it to all new car drivers as well. Once you realise what getting overtaken by a vehicle traveling at 70mph, 9 inches from your elbow feels like, you might have a tad more empathy.
Nearly all cyclists already
Nearly all cyclists already have licenses. Adult cyclists anyway. They’re the same driving licenses that neanderthals like Duncan Gay have.
Just substitute the word
Just substitute the word Pedestrian for Cyclist in the above article. Now I wonder how the pontificating idiot above would feel.
If all Pedestrians were licensed they would behave better and increase their safety! Surely that’s what is required! :-/
Country with mandatory helmet
Country with mandatory helmet laws hates cyclists shocker.
In most countries it’s
In most countries it’s totally impractical to license bikes, but when you’ve reduced cycling to a fraction of a percent with so many other stupid laws that fly in the face of scientific evidence you might just be able to pull it off.
License plates on bikes? Pull
License plates on bikes? Pull the other one Duncan – it’s got a tax disc on it :))
As a car driver I have a car
As a car driver I have a car license and as a racing cyclist I have a cycling license (which costs more than the car license)
Just having a license doesn’t help the rate of accidents. Just look at how many bingles there are between cars on a daily basis.
We need to look at driver awareness and teach drivers to actually drive rather than just how to pass the driving test
Irrelevant Minister “Some
Irrelevant Minister “Some bastards are still riding their bikes, even with the helmet law. We’ve got to stop them, it’s for their own good.”
Completely Irrelevant Minister, Duncan Gay “No worries, we’ll licence the stupid f*****ts and if that doesn’t work we’ll tax them as well. Obesity, who cares? Exercise is for idiots, and as you can see, I make very sure that my brain doesn’t get any.”
Surely even the average Aussie has worked out what’s going on by now? Government ministers have fingers in many pies, like manufacturing cars and building roads for cars, but I bet there are precious few who have shares in bike shops.
burtthebike wrote:Government
I think this is a bit of a long bow to draw. Holden moved production offshore at the end of last year, after which I don’t think Australia has a domestic car manufacturing industry. And the days of Russ Hinze and the 4 lane highway past his bottleshop in Oxenford are (I believe) now long gone. I think Gay’s comments are ill thought out but I don’t think they indicate he is corrupt.
I sense a money making scheme
I sense a money making scheme coming to NSW, the coffers must be on the empty side.
Why don’t they ban
Why don’t they ban pedestrians too. Then they could ban the aboriginals!!! How about banning homosexuals? And old people and disabled people. That’d solve all the problems.
So when they’ve banned and
So when they’ve banned and burned all the cyclists they’ll move onto pedestrians. Lets ban them, burn them all! We want the the roads all to our selves. When they are no more things to blame, ban and burn we’ll turn on ourselves, smash and burn them to smithereens. Get out the frikin’ way!
His name is GAY, GAY!
His name is GAY, GAY! Hahahaha
….in other news, nobody gives two shits about Australia.
I read the Queensland report
I read the Queensland report on cycling which resulted in the 1 and 1.5 metre passing law being trialled in Queensland. Of the ~ 80 recommendations, I don’t remember seeing one about licensing.
This just makes me think that Duncan Gay is pandering to the lies promulgated by motorists for political gain i.e. cyclists don’t pay road tax, cyclists get hit because they don’t wear a helmet or hi vis, they run red lights, they hold up traffic, they’re inconsiderate etc, etc.
It’s all easier than doing what they know works. Their own studies show that Sydney’s cycle lanes reduce accidents by 50% and yet when the liberal party came into power they stopped building Sydney’s cycle lanes. Never mind that cycling is far and away the cheapest way to move people around the city (Aucklands new rail link tunnel is costing $350,000 a metre as a comparison).
Go easy on poor Duncan. He
Go easy on poor Duncan. He must’ve copped a hell of a time at high school
They should be incensed, not
They should be incensed, not licensed.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/na
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2012/10/09/16/23/drivers-owe-900-million-in-unpaid-fines
unpaid traffic fines
similar here in Victoria
When I passed my driving test
When I passed my driving test I was given a license that allowed me to ride and drive all sorts of other stuff, big and small, that I was not trained or tested on. Now we have someone who is suggesting that I need a license to ride a bicycle; a mode of transport I have been using all of my life and I include the time when stabilisers were fitted!
The bicycle is the solution, not the problem!
It’s easier for them to just
It’s easier for them to just try (but fail) to ignore it (as demonstrated here as he and others can’t stop talking about cyclists…
live in Melbourne but have a
live in Melbourne but have a 457 visa so no need to get a Victoria licence my UK one is good – in the UK I could drive a 7.5tonne truck plus a trailer total 12tonnes – lucky when I first passed my test I actually drove a 5tonne truck on a regular basis and an experienced driver rode along and taught me how to use mirrors and assess space needed
here’s something from the NSW learn to drive site
http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/licensing/tests/hazardperceptiontest/buildyourskills/popupwindow5.htm
as far as I can tell you can’t brake, steer or reduce speed (but that might be browser dependent – I’m being generous)
cyclist appears but you can wait and click on him as your bonnet glides past and get an ok without deviating or slowing
half the “hazards” are stationery obstacles fits with a video I should dig out with an Au’ expert in road safety talking about setting speed limits – focussed on speed limit being set to reduce driver injuries when drove off road – other road users hardly got mentioned
One thing that I’ve noticed
One thing that I’ve noticed when traveling by bike, is how people judge my bike. Back home (Switzerland) it’s absolutely a no go to take your bike into a hotel room. Because it is regarded as a vehicle, quite as a car in fact. Kids go to school by bike, so it’s an essential part of growing up. When crossing the north american continent by bike, it was considered as a simple toy, you’d store in the trunk of your car to “have fun”.
Some years back we even had to buy plates for our bikes in Switzerland – the toy became a vehicle.
https://www.google.ch/search?q=velo+nummer&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=8EZnU7TbO-_T7AaUhoHQAg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1899&bih=1087
“I need to be tougher on car
That’s being ‘tougher on car drivers’, is it?
I’d like to see those statistics. If they’re anything like the UK ones, he’s talking out of his arse.
So how many of these cyclists weren’t doing the ‘right thing’? All? Some? None? Did the driver just decide not to take any chances and wipe them all out?
I wonder how many roads he intends to ban motorists from because ‘there have been a couple of accidents there’. I suppose ‘making the roads safer and providing decent infrastructure for all road users’ isn’t in his vocabulary.
Ah – so the vast majority of cyclists do the ‘right thing’ after all. His measures therefore won’t help anyone or achieve anything positive, but instead further depress cycling in a state that’s already very anti-cycling.
And that Phil Ayres, the so-called chief executive of Cycling New South Wales, appears to have assumed the role of cycling’s Uncle Tom. He’s doing cycling in NSW no favours at all with his pathetic grovelling and acquiescence.