- News
- Live blog

“I’m writing this because it might save someone’s life”: Cyclist riding length of Norway makes impassioned plea to drivers after “three near-death encounters”; AI-generated cyclist rides Mercedes/Canyon combo; Bus lane baloney + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

"It's about respect for human life": Danish adventurer riding the length of Norway makes plea for dangerously overtaking drivers to share the road
You might have thought senseless aggression on the roads was less likely in countries where the scenery and pace of life are a cut above the average UK commuter town – however, a growing number of cyclists are reporting bad experiences when exploring Norway’s epic landscape by bike.
> What to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision
Thomas Jarolics – better known as ‘Become Norwegian’ on Instagram – emigrated to the country from Denmark and often documents his adventures by boat, bike, skis and more. He’s currently riding the length of the country to raise funds for a mental health charity, but says he has encountered “three near-death experiences” just five days into his trip due to “impatient and dangerous overtaking”.
“This isn’t about cars vs cyclists”, says Thomas.
“It’s not about middle fingers, yelling, spitting, or windscreen washers deliberately sprayed as you pass. It’s about respect for human life.
“…The bigger the vehicle you drive, the greater your responsibility. Cyclists need to be mindful and respectful too. But when a bicycle and a vehicle collide, the consequences are not equal. You might arrive 10 seconds later, they might not arrive at all.
“Slow down. Give space. Share the road. 10 seconds for you could mean a lifetime for someone else.”
Wise words indeed. A British cyclist also commented on the post to say that her husband was “driven off the road” while competing in an ultra race, and several others commented on poor driving standards they had experienced in Norway – however, some said they had positive experiences while riding in the country.
Let’s hope Thomas encounters far better driving for the rest of his trip.
"The world’s first workout car": Bizarre AI-hallucinated video of cyclist 'riding' a Mercedes via a Canyon road bike is fooling no one (we hope)
“Who needs fancy machines when you’ve got a little creativity? 😂 pic.twitter.com/NxG0ncsoLo
— George (@george_geX0) August 10, 2026
The bastion of truth that is X-formerly-Twitter has served up another silly serving of slop thanks to this absurd AI-generated car/bike contraption.
On what looks like a German autobahn, our AI cyclist can be seen pedalling his Mercedes from the right rear passenger seat. It’s difficult to know where the drivetrain starts and ends, as one part is spinning around the car’s wheel, and there’s also a whole other chain-driven contraption inside the vehicle.
If neither the possibility of a cyclist generating enough power to make a very heavy vehicle tank along at 80mph or the other car further ahead being driven down the central reservation didn’t give it away, helpfully X’s wise community has added a note under the video: “The cyclist appears inside the frame in some shots and outside the frame in others. The video appears to be AI-generated and should be labeled accordingly.”
Glad we’ve cleared that one up!
A good idea?
Driving an SUV in the UK should require a C1 category driving license.
Let’s see how certain Timothy and Gemima are that they need one to ferry their kids around Walthamstow then.
— John Bull (@garius.bsky.social) 11 August 2026 at 09:21
"Driver entitlement on full display here" Driver pulls into bus lane without checking... tells oncoming cyclist to get into the cycle lane
Contains 🤬. Driver entitlement on full display here. Illegally enters the bus lane without bothering to check if it was clear. Then had the cheek to gesture that I should have been using the cycle lane. pic.twitter.com/gHNKJDB3dy
— Cycling For Mind (@CyclingForMind) August 10, 2026
If you think the cyclist should have been in the cycle lane, does that mean it’s no longer illegal to pull into a bus lane?
Regardless, this cyclist is perfectly entitled to use the bus lane as he mentions under his post on X, claiming that the cycle lane to the left of it was “obstructed by a vehicle”. While riding along it, a van driver pulls out, nearly hitting the cyclist who managed to take evasive action.
It’s alleged the driver then gestured for the cyclist to get into the cycle lane, and plenty of people on the social media website formerly known as Twitter appear to agree, seemingly oblivious to the face that they are completely wrong.
Will the driver face action for the illegal manoeuvre? We’ve asked the rider behind the Cycling For Mind account for more info.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
3 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Insurance cost already does vary with vehicle and associated risk profile though.
Hmm - the way you've edited your post to tone down the suggestion that they were saying something they weren't suggests even you don't believe that.
Thanks. I'd heard that there was a split in the community. Well in that case let's hope that he does do something about their opposition to cyclists. All for safe cycling measures, but not just because one group doesn't like cyclists.
Being fair, there are a few councillors of all shades who seem intent on not disturbing their preexisting opinions on certain topics with new facts or understanding. I do think the populist parties are more susceptible to this though. They seem to attract those with the idea that government is corrupt and it just needs some people with "common sense" to come in and fix it. They *are* right that there's inefficiency, inflexibility, self-serving and even some corruption there. The error is in thinking that a) those are the biggest issues and b) inexperienced people with strong opinions (and sometimes cloth ears) can quickly change it for the better...
They are selling off their tools and "Substantial customer database" too: https://bikebiz.com/job/bike-repair-servicing-business-for-sale/ At least the cafe is staying open...
@jackcycles If he was on the road, you can almost guarantee there would be an equally ignorant driver saying "why don't you ride on the cycle path"? No matter where he rode there will be someone who has a lack of common courtesy.
"Driving an SUV in the UK should require a C1 category driving license." At the end of the day, this is all about safety/risk. I agree with the idea and would welcome a view from the motor insurance industry. If the risk andor claims costs of KSIs/property damage is much higher for drivers of larger vehicles, should those increased premiums/renewals be shared amongst only those drivers? Or, as is currently, all drivers including those of us who only drive smaller vehicles? As a cyclist on the road, I'm not paying "extra" insurance for damage caused by drivers. As a driver, I am.
Councillor Ed Hill demonstrates perfectly how inexperienced and badly trained are Reform and ex-Reform councillors. Anybody informed on the subject would have ensured that their diatribe contained at least one example of 'I'm a cyclist myself, but......'
3 thoughts on ““I’m writing this because it might save someone’s life”: Cyclist riding length of Norway makes impassioned plea to drivers after “three near-death encounters”; AI-generated cyclist rides Mercedes/Canyon combo; Bus lane baloney + more on the live blog”
Better still, make SUV drivers register an abnormal load every time they want to move the vehicle. 😁
“Driving an SUV in the UK should require a C1 category driving license.”
At the end of the day, this is all about safety/risk.
I agree with the idea and would welcome a view from the motor insurance industry.
If the risk andor claims costs of KSIs/property damage is much higher for drivers of larger vehicles, should those increased premiums/renewals be shared amongst only those drivers?
Or, as is currently, all drivers including those of us who only drive smaller vehicles?
As a cyclist on the road, I’m not paying “extra” insurance for damage caused by drivers.
As a driver, I am.
Insurance cost already does vary with vehicle and associated risk profile though.