BBC presenter and cycle commuter Jeremy Vine has called out fellow presenter Jeremy Clarkson over a newspaper column in which the latter criticised a mother he had seen accompanying her children to school in Kensington.
In response to Clarkson’s assertion that “cycling in London is extremely dangerous,” Vine countered: “No, some people who drive cars are extremely dangerous. That is the issue.”
Writing in his column in The Sun on Saturday under the heading, Let Vine Be Bike Battler, Clarkson said:
This week, I saw a school-run mum cycling through the busy streets of Kensington in London with her two young children riding their little bikes in her wake.
Now, I’m sure that later in the day at the avocado and muesli bar, all her silly friends will have congratulated her for being so ecological and public spirited.
But the fact is that cycling in London is extremely dangerous and that one day, God forbid, it’s possible one of her children could be killed.
Yes, there’d be an outcry and the motorist who ran over the child would get some serious jail time.
But the child would still be dead.
So, if you’re reading this, love, and I know you’re not because you’re a Guardian type, but if you are, don’t use your kids as pawns in a battle Jeremy Vine is quite capable of fighting for himself.
So far, so Clarkson, in line with the anti-cyclist rhetoric he has so often employed both in print and while presenting Top Gear and, more recently, The Grand Tour.
But the TV host and journalist, who has a home in Holland Park, has been spotted at times cycling around Kensington – most notably in the wake of his sacking by the BBC in 2015.
And going by the way he sang the praises of Copenhagen in a column in The Sunday Times three years earlier in which he said that prioritising bikes over cars made it such a liveable city that he would move there “in a heartbeat,” he presumably understands the value of protected cycling infrastructure.
> Jeremy Clarkson turns cycling advocate as he praises Copenhagen’s approach
As Twitter user @Commuter76 who posted a picture of the column pointed out, Clarkson’s spleen might better be vented at the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, given their opposition to having a Cycle Superhighway (CS9) built along Kensington High Street.
If Clarkson saw the same family that I did, this was on where #cs9 should be in Kensington but isn’t going to be any time soon. And he’s right, someone will likely be killed because of that choice. pic.twitter.com/OW2icErjSW
— PB (@Commuter76) June 23, 2018
The planned CS9, which will run from Brentford and along Chiswick High Road towards the city centre, will end at Kensington Olympia – the boundary between Hammersmith & Fulham, and the RKBC.
Cyclists will therefore have to travel along Kensington High Street together with motor traffic and past the Royal Albert Hall before rejoining protected infrastructure in the shape of the East-West Cycle Superhighway at Hyde Park.
Vine, whose commute to and from Broadcasting House in Portland Place takes him through Kensington High Street, retweeted @Commuter76’s tweet, highlighting it was motorists – not cyclists – who were the source of danger.
“Cycling in London is extremely dangerous.”
No, some people who drive cars are extremely dangerous. That is the issue. https://t.co/CDnXz4LWmq— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) June 25, 2018
Vine regularly posts video of incidents captured on his ride to social media.
In 2016, Clarkson accused him of “selfish” cycling following an incident Vine captured on camera that later resulted in the driver concerned being imprisoned after being convicted of driving without reasonable consideration and using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour.

























25 thoughts on “Jeremy Vine calls out Jeremy Clarkson over criticism of cycling school run mum”
I’d genuinely forgotten
I’d genuinely forgotten Jeremy Clarkson. No need to bring him back TBH.
“motorist who ran over the
“motorist who ran over the child would get some serious jail time.”
If only!
Clarkson himself admits he
Clarkson himself admits he doesn’t believe the things he writes. People should stop giving it attention. That’s what he wants. That’s what he’s good at. That’s how he is minted
He’s an agent provocateur. Or
He’s an agent provocateur. Or, in Anglo-Saxon, a shit-stirrer. Or, in internet-speak, a troll. Let not thy shit be stirren, as it says in the Bible. Maybe.
I give Vine thumbs up
I give Vine thumbs up whenever I’ve cycled past him in Hyde Park recently. I’m not sure I’d give the same hand signal to Clarkson, who is trying to drag us back to the stone age.
ChrisB200SX wrote:
Personally, I like the design of stone age vehicles
hawkinspeter wrote:
I consider Pebbles on the road to be a hazard.
Cunt says cunty thing.
Cunt says cunty thing.
Beecho wrote:
You might say he’s a real Jeremy Hunt
Only comment I would make to
Only comment I would make to the mother is that I think it is safer to follow your children rather than the other way around. That way you can stick yourself further out in to the road so that the vehicles have to give the children a little more clearance. Also you can see what the children are doing and if required call instructions to them.
I don’t read newspapers. They don’t contain news, they contain opinions.
Clarkson would make a good
Clarkson would make a good inner tube.
James Walker wrote:
for a fat bike.
leqin wrote:
Or a speed bump on a rat run. that’s a better way to protect kids, slow the blacked out tanks down a bit
Can somebody more social
Can somebody more social media savvy than I please tweet this toJeremy Clarkson ?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-39356514
Thank you.
Paraphrased as: “Pathetic cad
Paraphrased as: “Pathetic cad says something stupid”
I know that the term ‘cad’ may be a targe archaic but what term better covers some pointless little multimillionaire twunt, ‘friend’ of prime ministers and senior newspaper editors, who goes around beating up the staff – cowardly little cunt.
Why is road.cc giving this
Why is road.cc giving this story publicity?
A ghost writer has knocked out a silly season article in the guise of ‘angry man’ in a deliberate attempt to cause controversy.
Feuds are perceived to good be for the media as they are self-perpetuating and need little input from the paper. This story is an extended dig at the ‘elitist’ BBC via Jeremy (?) Vine and the Guardian.
I doubt that the supposed author even saw the copy before someone forwarded a link to him. Happy to be proved wrong, but celebrity columnists are paid for their name above the article, not for the contents.
Clarkson says roads are
Clarkson says roads are dangerous
Vine says roads aren’t dangerous, cars are
I would argue Vine is just as incorrect, disappearing cycle lanes, poor road surfaces, inadequate parking/parking restrictions for bike lanes etc.
Mb747 wrote:
This is what Vine actually said “No, some people who drive cars are extremely dangerous. That is the issue.” Not that cars are the problem. The issues you raise wouldn’t be a problem if it wasn’t for the drivers.
On a similar note, I had a
On a similar note, I had a thought along the lines of Clarkson’s the other day.
I had decided to not cycle to work as there were forecast 50-60mph winds and I thought that would be rather dangerous to cycle in. I ended up walking to work as all the trains were cancelled due to overhead cables down, trees on line etc. due the the really bad storm we had. Whilst I was walking along (thinking how glad I was that I was not cycling in this weather) a lady passed me on her bike with her child on the back of it in a child seat.
I was left wondering if I should be concerned that this lady had decided to put her child at risk in a situation that I was not willing to risk myself or if I had misjudged the situation and should just man up and cycle in such weather.
Clarkson himself is one of
Clarkson himself is one of the reason why drivers are dangerous. He spent years on TV encouraging people to drive like twats
Sounds like Clarkson is
Sounds like Clarkson is advocating for less cars on the road and more cycling infrastructure. Someone give this man an ebike so he can stop moaning about bicycles.
Frankie Boyle aint wrong, JC
Frankie Boyle aint wrong, JC is a cancer growth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qrCrxixBKY
Clarkson should be recycled
Clarkson should be recycled into the rubber used for condoms and distributed at an STD clinic.
Actually Vine I’ve seen
Actually Vine I’ve seen dangerous people in all forms of transport, even just when walking.
embattle wrote:
and what is the distribution like among those forms of transport of people they kill or seriously injure?