£300m to be spent on making 33 of London's most dangerous junctions safer for cyclists & pedestrians

Boris Johnson & TfL announce programme that will see "60s relic" gyratories scrapped & segregated cycle lanes introduced

by Simon_MacMichael   February 26, 2014  

London:cyclist in traffic (copyright Simon MacMichael).jpg

Mayor of London Boris Johnson says 33 major junctions in London described as “Sixties relics” are to undergo a transformation as part of a £300 million project aimed at making roads safer for cyclists and pedestrians.

British Cycling has welcomed the plans, saying they reflect a “clear political vision” that will encourage more people onto bikes.

Meanwhile, London Cycling Campaign says that the announcement "vindicates the actions of the many thousands of people" that have supported its campaigns to make the capital's streets safer for cyclists.

According to today's announcement, 150 cyclists and pedestrians have been killed or seriously injured in the last three years alone at the 33 junctions involved, but often no alternative side-street routes are available, meaning that people on bike or on foot have to negotiate them.

They include a number of locations highlighted by campaigners as presenting particular danger to those on two wheels such as King’s Cross and Bow Roundabout.

At some locations such as Archway, Swiss Cottage, Wandsworth and Aldgate – where French student Philippine de Gerin Ricard was crushed to death by a lorry in July last year – existing gyratory systems will be ripped out and “replaced with two-way roads, segregated cycle tracks and new traffic-free public space.”

At other high-profile locations including Hammersmith and Vauxhall Cross – scene of a ‘die-in’ staged in December last year by the protest group Stop Killing Cyclists – “safe and direct segregated cycle tracks” will be put in place while those locations undergo long-term redevelopment programmes.

Today’s announcement by the mayor and Transport for London (TfL) describes those two locations as “intimidating” for cyclists and pedestrians – very different language to that used by Mr Johnson in November 2011, when he attracted strong criticism from cycle campaigners after he said, “if you keep your wits about you, Elephant & Castle is perfectly negotiable" for cyclists.

That roundabout, the most dangerous for bike riders in the capital in the capital in terms of the number of reported casualties, will disappear altogether under the plans announced today.

The map below pinpoints the locations concerned – we’ve also listed them at the end of this article – and you can find a higher resolution version of it here.

Work is due to start on some junctions in the second half of the year, with detailed designs of the first that will be overhauled set to be made public next month.

Mr Johnson said: “These road junctions are relics of the Sixties which blight and menace whole neighbourhoods. Like so much from that era, they’re also atrociously-designed and wasteful of space.

“Because of that, we can turn these junctions into more civilised places for cyclists and pedestrians, while at the same time maintaining their traffic function.”

According to Mr Johnson and TfL, the proposed changes outlined today reflect a commitment in the Mayor’s Cycling Vision, published last year, to move the Better Junctions programme “away from making minor, often cosmetic changes at a large number of junctions to delivering real and transformational change at the busiest and worst junctions.”

They say that has resulted in a dramatic increase in proposed spending on each location.

When, in the wake of the deaths of cyclists Deep Lee at King’s Cross and Brian Dorling and Svitlana Tereschenko at Bow Roundabout in autumn 2011, plans were announced to overhaul 100 of the most dangerous junctions in London, the anticipated £19 budget would have resulted in £190,000 being spent at each location.

The new plans to increase the budget more than fifteen-fold to £300 million while focusing on a third as many sites means the average spend on each will be £9 million.

The cash to pay for the works will come from a £100 million Better Junctions budget and from the separate Cycle Superhighways budget, both announced in the Mayor’s Cycling Vision, as well as from the general TfL Major Schemes programme budget, plus £50 million “from confirmed third-party and developer contributions.”

According to a timetable set out in the London’s Transport section of a document published last month called Draft Further Changes to the London Plan, the works at the 33 locations covered under the Better Junctions programme are due to be completed by the end of 2016.

Other junctions – such as five on Cycle Superhighway 2, which runs from Bow to Aldgate – that are not within the 33 included on today’s list will also benefit from separately budgeted improvements.

It has also been confirmed that a Dutch-style roundabout that has been tested at the Transport Research Laboratory in Berkshire will be trialled at an unspecified location in London next year.

TfL’s managing director of surface transport, Leon Daniels, said: “For over a year our designers and engineers have been working flat out to develop new junction designs for these 33 locations to completely change how they operate, transforming their areas for cyclists, pedestrians and the wider local community.

“They are some of the busiest traffic intersections in Europe, so this work has been complicated. But we are now fully committed to delivering these junction improvements as quickly as possible, making London safer and more inviting for all.”

Martin Key, campaigns manager at British Cycling, which earlier this month launched its #ChooseCycling campaign, said: "This is yet another example of the transformational difference that can be made when there is clear political leadership to prioritise cycling as a form of transport.

“The Mayor and Transport for London have a clear vision for improving the daily experience for thousands of people who choose to cycle across the capital.

“This scheme to fix the worst junctions brings us one step closer to persuading thousands more people to take up cycling as an attractive and easy way to get around. We'd urge cities across Britain to follow suit," he added.

London Cycling Campaign's chief executive, Ashok Sinha, said: "At last we have a firm commitment, and the funding, to tackle the main barriers to cycling as identified by cyclists in the capital.

"Rapid implementation of this programme will help reduce deaths and serious injuries to cyclists, as well as make our roads safer for pedestrians too.

"We share the Mayor’s view that gyratories blight our capital and removing them will improve quality of life for all.”

Here is the full list of locations, in alphabetical order, of the 33 junctions concerned:

1. Aldgate Gyratory
2. Apex Junction
(part of Shoreditch Triangle)
3. Archway Gyratory
4. Blackfriars
5. Borough High Street/Tooley Street Junction
6. Bow Roundabout

7. Chiswick Roundabout/Kew Bridge Junction
8. Elephant & Castle Northern Roundabout
9. Great Portland Street Gyratory

10. Hammersmith Broadway Gyratory
11. Highbury Corner
12. King’s Cross
13. Lambeth Bridge Northern 
Roundabout
14. Lambeth Bridge Southern 
Roundabout
15. Lancaster Gate Gyratory
16. Marble Arch Gyratory
17. Nag’s Head Gyratory
18. Old Street Roundabout
19. Oval Triangle
20. Parliament Square
21. Rotherhithe Roundabout
22. Spur Road Gyratory
23. St Paul’s Gyratory
24. Stockwell Gyratory
25. Stratford Gyratory
26. Surrey Quays Gyratory
27. Swiss Cottage Gyratory
28. Tower Gateway
29. Vauxhall Cross Gyratory
30. Wandsworth Town Centre Gyratory
31. Waterloo Roundabout

32. Westminster Bridge Road

33. Woolwich Road / A102 Junction

16 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

*yawns*

posted by northstar [1086 posts]
26th February 2014 - 16:44

like this
Like (24)

Believe it when I see it.

posted by tarquin_foxglove [79 posts]
26th February 2014 - 17:25

like this
Like (25)

Very much looking forward to this happening.

The Nag's Head, Archway, and Highbury Corner Gyratories are awful and on various routes I do at least weekly.

If this happens, will make a massive change.

posted by jacknorell [286 posts]
26th February 2014 - 17:32

like this
Like (15)

Great, having to use 5 of these on my commute I know what i nihtmare they can be, so having something put in that will hopefully be well thought through and safer for cycling round will be great. I hope there isn't a way for them to back out of it quietly after grabbing headlines with the announcements

posted by md6 [154 posts]
26th February 2014 - 17:33

like this
Like (14)

md6 wrote:
I hope there isn't a way for them to back out of it quietly after grabbing headlines with the announcements

Well, the 33 started off as 100...

posted by teaboy [149 posts]
26th February 2014 - 18:12

like this
Like (19)

Call me Mr Pessimistic but I'll believe it when I see it. There was a junction in Southampton redesigned recently amid a blaze of publicity to make it safer for cyclists. It was 9 whole days before there was a hit-and-run there.

The usual platitudes, promises and headline-grabbing publicity and what we'll get will be a random mix of painted lines designed to make life as complicated as possible for bikes. Sad

I hope I'm wrong, I suspect I'm right.

posted by crazy-legs [489 posts]
26th February 2014 - 18:23

like this
Like (23)

So... what _exactly_ is going to go in? A segregated bike lane with a long wait at the lights? The article mentions the testing of a dutch-style roundabout (which I'm assured by friends that have cycled and driven in Holland work b/c motorists stop and wait for cyclists who have right of way across junctions), but does that have anything to do with what's really going in?

posted by Ush [379 posts]
26th February 2014 - 18:55

like this
Like (20)

teaboy wrote:
md6 wrote:
I hope there isn't a way for them to back out of it quietly after grabbing headlines with the announcements

Well, the 33 started off as 100...

Except that list of 100 only had budget that allowed for a lick of paint, or a sign or two at council costs...

At least this allows a pretty good chunk of work to be carried out.

I also think given the targets in this list, it's being pushed through as generally improving the area for all users, which makes it more likely to get done. Those gyratories are both eye-sores and kill all 'street life' where they are.

posted by jacknorell [286 posts]
26th February 2014 - 19:36

like this
Like (10)

the proposals for the Elephand and Castle makeover have already leaked out onto the web and are being picked over right now... in fact, they look to be yet another motor-vehicles must pass unimpeeded nightmare while cyclists have to fight it out in the sides of the road in order to get into an ASL.

Yet more places for drivers to left-hook cyclists as they turn off the new junction... and yet more places that only the vehicular "run-with-the-bulls" types will wish to venture into. It will NOT be a place to take your kids around on their bikes...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=397282810407823&set=a.3597442741...

posted by Paul_C [154 posts]
26th February 2014 - 21:09

like this
Like (26)

Its a start, but only a start. Much more needs to be done once these or as these are being over hauled.

MikeOnABike's picture

posted by MikeOnABike [23 posts]
26th February 2014 - 21:21

like this
Like (8)

Plans are out for the Deep Lee Kings Cross junction. A shambles of short disjointed cycle tracks, weird lanes, advanced stop boxes and green paint.

We are clearly years from real change in London if this is any guide. It's going to be a long fight...

posted by drmatthewhardy [299 posts]
26th February 2014 - 22:49

like this
Like (20)

The plans for E&C look like a psychedelic flashback. I cannot see who it's going to be better for.

...

posted by AlexStriplight [65 posts]
26th February 2014 - 23:35

like this
Like (9)

Nice - I go through several of those a day ... even if they change Elephant & Castle I will be happy - that is by far the worst on my commute - I always jump the red lights heading north into it to beat the traffic and have a clear entry into it ...

Extra bike? What extra bike dear?

goggy's picture

posted by goggy [87 posts]
26th February 2014 - 23:57

like this
Like (8)

It looks like good news, but like others I'll believe it when the work is finished.

Plus the primary legislation just doesn't exist (yet) to give cyclists priority in some places and truly separate the modes "in time" at junctions (unlike elsewhere where you can at least separate them "in space". Well, unless you use grade separation at a junction, which can be great and eliminate waiting, but it's very expensive and takes quite a bit of room.

And I think the trialled roundabouts are great in principle, but will suffer from being an unfamiliar concept here. Much of the benefit comes from being a familiar consistent concept in the Netherlands, where drivers know they need to give way to cyclists when exiting.

posted by pmanc [113 posts]
27th February 2014 - 2:03

like this
Like (9)

The unspecified location for the Dutch style roundabout could well be the junction of the Albert Embankment, and Lambeth Rd, just over the river from Millbank. There's been a design study for it there.

Don't ask me how I know.

I used to work near Elephant & Castle and avoided the junction, using some of the numerous little back streets instead. I don't even like driving my car round it, let alone riding my bicycle or my motorbike. There are other routes you can take that avoid it and don't take you far out of your way.

OldRidgeback

posted by OldRidgeback [2132 posts]
27th February 2014 - 11:16

like this
Like (8)

Majority of comments on here are negative in response to something which is good news for our safety, surely?

It's almost as if some people like the 'oppressed minority' status and the moaning rights that come with it! Wink

posted by 700c [556 posts]
28th February 2014 - 12:00

like this
Like (7)