At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Hmmmm. CS Ratcliff need to get the word out to her subordinates and divisions then. Cause most of them haven't an inkling.
Amazed he didn't cite disabled people needing access. Its pretty simple. "I'm going to prioritise cars in every way I can because that gets me more...
It's depressing how little recumbents have progressed. The models available now are essentially the same as those 20 years ago.
I'm sorry I close passed you but my vehicle is too wide
Sorry, fixed the double entry! ...
BMW Mini, not a proper one.
See recently reported comments by elected labour party represenetives in Burnley to see how that works.
I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to...
I re-fuse to believe that not charging drivers is the current attitude
Most modern cars, especially SUV's perform very badly on the Moose test. Essentially a stunt driver has to weave through tightly spaced cones at...