The Government has said it is to launch a review of UK Anti-Doping’s (Ukad) practices early next year. The Mirror reports that it will be the first such review since Ukad was formed as an independent body in November 2009.
Appearing before MPs on the culture, media and sport select committee, sports minister Tracey Crouch said:
"Ukad remains one of the best anti-doping agencies in the world, but we're certainly not complacent, so I will be launching a review into Ukad in the new year.
"That's partly because they were founded in 2009 and all government agencies are subject to periodic review and Ukad hasn't had one yet.
"And while we accept that Ukad has a brilliant reputation for its anti-doping regime and testing - which is why it's been used in Russia to try to get them compliant with the Wada (World Anti-Doping Agency) code – we want to make sure it remains that way and we have a robust system in place."
As well as its work in Russia, where it has been mandated by Wada to oversee the Russian Anti-Doping Agency's attempts to rebuild its testing operation, Ukad also advised the International Olympic Committee's 'Pre-Rio Anti-Doping Taskforce' on an intelligence-led approach to testing.
However, the organisation’s reputation is not unblemished. In July an inquiry into its handling of an investigation into Dr Mark Bonar – who was accused of prescribing banned substances to athletes – concluded that opportunities to gather intelligence, secure evidence and investigate him were missed.
Amateur cyclist Dan Stevens was the whistleblower behind the investigation and the chair of the independent review, former Merseyside Assistant Chief Constable Andy Ward, said there was “some confusion and lack of clarity” in how to manage a source looking to reduce a drugs ban through whistleblowing.
He also said that a simple check with Dr Bonar’s governing body, the General Medical Council, should have been undertaken to establish whether any other intelligence might have existed which could have supported or negated the allegations made – action he said had been suggested “on at least seven occasions.”
Ukad also suffered a defeat at the Court of Arbitration for Sport when Lizzie Deignan (then Armitstead) successfully appealed against a ban for missing three tests within a year, by showing that Ukad's doping control officer had not made reasonable attempts to locate the rider.
In a statement, Ukad chief executive Nicole Sapstead welcomed the review, saying: "This an opportunity for us to take stock of how we operate and determine what else can be done, by both Ukad and the government, to improve our approach to anti-doping in the UK."
Caught out by driving in bus lanes or yellow box junctions? We want to hear from you on whether the current traffic enforcement measures are fair...
This is why places like the BBC try to get opinions from youngsters in distress to further their anti-cycling agenda - any criticism of the...
Why the fudge would you employ a CEO who's previous exeperience was in selling a purely digital product, when your business model is selling an...
A bit more about it here https://road.cc/content/feature/cycling-tech-innovations-never-took-off-...
The old 'I didn't mean to kill them with my motor vehicle' dodge- never fails!
Yeah, I was just looking on Google Maps and it's too old to show others what we're talking about.
What a weird illustration of a bike, looks like a time trial Moulton! Perhaps nobody has explained to the drivers what bikes actually look like so...
HGV lorry lodged underneath bridge following crash https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cge8zwe4egyo
Giro Division - very good. Let's hope this giro isn't marred by crashes, don't want to see any riders lose control again.
Problem is that if they gave buses their own pot of the budget, you are effectively subsidising the companies which run them so why aren't you...