Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

London mayor reveals where £154m per year will come from, following announcement to double cycling budget

Transport for London will double cycling budget to £154m per year, equivalent to £17 per head per year, by reorganising 'flabby' organisation but Greens say buses will suffer without motor traffic reductions...

Transport for London (TfL) has revealed how it will find the money to double spending on cycling over the next five years, with the aim of increasing cycling levels by 36% by 2021/22.

As set out by its five year business plan, the capital’s transport authority will save £800m per year by 2020/21, and will increase spending £154m per year on cycling, while doubling funds to tackle air pollution to £875m over five years, as well as freezing transport fares and increasing Underground capacity.

The Mayor says he will save the money without raising fares, by reorganising ‘flabby’ TfL, but the London Green Party has criticised the plan for failing to set a target for reducing some of the capital's annual 2.2 billion journeys, without which, it says, buses will be stuck in traffic as more road space is dedicated to cycling and walking.

Sadiq Khan "to double" amount spent on cycling in London

London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, said: “From my first day as Mayor of London I’ve been on a mission to create a modern and affordable transport that works for every Londoner. The new TfL Business Plan being presented today sets out an ambitious and wide-reaching programme that allows us to both freeze TfL fares, and invest record amounts modernising London’s transport’s infrastructure.

“Our plans over the next five years include modernising major Underground stations, bringing forward plans to extend the Bakerloo Line, and investing record amounts in cycling and cleaning up London’s air. The greatest city in the world must also have a genuinely world-class transport system, and this is vital for the future success of London’s economy. Today sets out the scale of our ambition.”

TfL will save around £2bn by reducing management layers, merging functions and eliminating duplication of work, another £2bn reducing reliance on agency staff and negotiating better deals with suppliers, and increasing advertising revenue and selling off ‘spare land’ for housing for another £3.4bn, to save a total estimated £800m.

However, Caroline Russell, London Assembly Green Party Member, says by reducing road space with new cycling and walking infrastructure, and not tackling motor traffic volumes, buses will end up stuck in traffic.

Russell said: “This plan just doesn’t add up. TfL has planned for the same amount of car driving trips every year from now until 2021 – 2.2 billion journeys per year.”

“With buses having to compete for space with this many cars, the Mayor will struggle to attract more bus passengers and get his transport budget to balance.”

“As long as the roads remain clogged up with cars, buses will remain slow and unappealing.”

“The Mayor must set a bold target for reducing traffic over his term of office.”

Sadiq Khan outlines ambitious plans to tackle London pollution

A number of strategies have been announced to tackle London’s air pollution, which breaches legal limits and kills around 9,400 people prematurely each year. The ‘world’s first’ Ultra Low Emission Zone will be launched, with a current consultation looking to extend that to the North and South Circulars for all vehicles, and London-wide for lorries, coaches and buses, potentially from 2019, at a cost of £610m.

The Mayor is also consulting on an emissions surcharge, a T-charge, which will remove older vehicles from central London. He also proposes to introduce five Low Emission Neighbourhoods, spanning eight boroughs and involving local businesses. The Mayor’s Air Quality Fund will provide £9m to target some of the worst pollution hotspots across London.

TfL will only buy hybrid or zero emissions buses from 2018, with diesel buses phased out. Similarly, all new black cabs licensed after 1 January 2018 will need to be zero-emissions capable; no new diesel taxis will be allowed. The mayor will provide a £65m fund for cabbies to decommission taxis over 10 years old, to encourage early adoption. All new minicabs will need to meet the same standard by 1 January 2020, and all private hire vehicles by 2023.

Plans for reducing buses on Oxford Street will be published next year.

The mayor is also calling on the Government to match his ambition and introduce a national diesel scrappage scheme, implement a 21st century Clean Air Act, reform Vehicle Excise Duty making polluting cars less attractive to buyers, and give London additional funding and powers to tackle the public health emergency caused by poor air quality.

 

Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
rliu | 7 years ago
2 likes

The inner city poor do not drive, with one of the key factors being they're often recent immigrants who have never driven in the UK and are comfortable with that fact.
But the outer city poor are wedded to the driving is a necessity of life mindset instilled in 50s and 60s Britain, these are the Daily Mail 'war in motorists' heartlands, who are up in arms about any encroachment on their god given right to have a private car.

Avatar
ktache | 7 years ago
0 likes

The poorest cannot afford to drive.  Car driving is expensive and makes people poorer.  The poorest walk, some cycle and some take the bus.

Avatar
emishi55 replied to ktache | 7 years ago
2 likes

ktache wrote:

The poorest cannot afford to drive.  Car driving is expensive and makes people poorer.  The poorest walk, some cycle and some take the bus.

 

But the 'poorer' drive while train travel remains unacceptably expensive. Walk on fares are simoky not fair. There aren't enough incentives in the form of rail-cards or reasonbly priced cheap-day returns (such as once existed).

 

In short car driving is subsidised, but should be far more expensive, to support bike infrastructure.

Itt's just so absurd to still have to be typing out the same thing as twenty years ago. 

Avatar
davel | 7 years ago
1 like

Hopefully he'll employ people dressed up as Death to walk down central London roads scything a few mm off cars' bodywork, and sell the shavings for recycling into bikes.

Avatar
Sevenfold | 7 years ago
1 like

Reform VED by dropping the old 'road tax' that has not existed since the 1930's & put it on fuel duty. The more you drive = the more it costs. The polluter pays. simples as they say. The only small fly in the ointment is that the Government would have to refund the pot of VED it is sitting on & hence increase borrowing for a short time while the new money flows in. End of cars being untaxed on the road as well so multiple benefits. Would the Government, any Government implement this 'rational' solution - fat chance.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Sevenfold | 7 years ago
1 like

Sevenfold wrote:

Reform VED by dropping the old 'road tax' that has not existed since the 1930's & put it on fuel duty. The more you drive = the more it costs. The polluter pays. simples as they say. The only small fly in the ointment is that the Government would have to refund the pot of VED it is sitting on & hence increase borrowing for a short time while the new money flows in. End of cars being untaxed on the road as well so multiple benefits. Would the Government, any Government implement this 'rational' solution - fat chance.

Adding a few quid a week to most drivers' costs probably isn't enough to change behaviour (although it might help as part of a wider strategy). I'm not sure how much drivers even think about per mile costs - you'd almost need to fit taxi-style meters on the dashboard. Human behaviour is often very odd in avoiding sensible decisions (e.g. switching energy supplier) because the costs aren't ticking up in front of your face.

Avatar
davel replied to Sevenfold | 7 years ago
0 likes

Sevenfold wrote:

The polluter pays. simples as they say. 

Hold on. Particulates are also produced by tyre and road surface breakdown. Fully electric cars that won't need liquid fuel will avoid fuel duty....

I agree that VED is daft but how do you make electric cars pay as they go, without just indiscriminately whacking a load of duty on electricity bills?

Latest Comments