- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Tubeless valves
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
"13.8km long, the Alpe d’Huez climb has an average gradient of 8.1 per cent, topping out at 13 per cent, and with a vertical gain of 1,860m." That does not add up...it is has a lot less vertical gain. 1860 is the height at the top(?) but the climb starts at more than 700 m height.
Yeah, they say the height at the top, not the vertical gain, so no mistake. You know I see a lot of comments these days where people just don't read something, then batter away at their keyboard correcting a phantom error.
Text still says vertical gain not total height, sorry, but you seem to be the one not reading before typing
maybe they say something different on the video but that was not what I was referring to.