Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
32 comments
if no history then believe that will only be a simple caution then
Certainly many of them are incompetent. That doesn't excuse cyclists from"playing nicely", as you put it. We should play nicely anyway. That's just being nice. Which we should do. Because it's nice.
Surely, there had to be insurance (at least a cover note) and identity etc to get a reg num. I would have thought the garage / first owner (assuming this eejit is not that person) would gladly provide details of whom it was sold to? Then simply track the ownership through the owners. Just because DVLA has nought doesn't mean it's untraceable - and with no valid tax / insurance, it's financially worth the effort for the fines, before we get to the attempted assault...
Can't quite make it out but is he wearing a seat belt?
Just a thought
Police aware:
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Exclusive-interview-Bristol-cyclist-caught/...
shame he spoils the article with the unnecessary comparison quote "...but equally I have seen cyclists who go through red lights, wend through traffic or don't ware reflective clothing. It definitely goes both ways."
yes because not ware[sic]ing reflective clothing is totally the same as some idiot in a BMW driving towards you and trying to push you off your bike isnt it
That's not what he's saying so please don't quote it out of context. As a Bristolian I can see where he's coming from too.
What he actually says is:
"It does show a larger issue of driver and cyclist interaction on the roads."
"I am both a driver and a cyclist, so can see it from both sides."
"I have experienced many cars who have driven too close to me or erratically, but equally I have seen cyclists who go through red lights, wend through traffic or don't ware reflective clothing. It definitely goes both ways.
"There need to be a mutual respect between drivers and cyclists, but whatever happens this kind of behaviour is not acceptable."
In other words he draws a clear distinction between "this kind of behaviour" (i.e. pushing somebody) and the "larger issue of driver and cyclist interaction", which includes refelctive clothing, running red lights and wending through traffic.
A balanced view of the wider issue, in other words, rather than "all car drivers are murderers-in-waiting who should be locked up because no cyclist ever did anything wrong ever".
I'm still not sure why failing to wear reflective clothing is 'the same' as incompetent or threatening usage of a tonne of metal. But we still have to make obeisance to the idea of playing nicely with the motons. And no, I don't think they are all 'murderers in waiting ', but I am sure that too many of them are impatient, thoughtless, and only marginally competent to control their death machines.
Is it my eyesight, or is his seat belt missing along with his brain cells!
But there's a vehicle. I read on here last week you couldn't have assaults where vehicles were used?
Police are treating it as common assault. Good news, in some ways suprising though.
Saw the headline and wondered if it'd be Bristol - what a surprise, and a road I ride regularly to work too. The number of motorised morons around town never ceases to disappoint me. Hope they throw the book at this little pillock, but I suspect a ticking off will be about all he'll get.
I hope they catch him and throw the book at him. There should be a permanent ban (for life) for this kind of thing, he clearly isn't intelligent, sensible or mature enough to be driving. Let alone driving a car that costs around £30k.
Idiot
doesn't he know that pushing the cyclist with his arm is assault, but if he uses the car it's just an accident. whoopsie.
No tax or MOT on the vehicle, so I guess that means no insurance too.
Paddypower have any odds on the driver being licensed?
Too new for an MOT.
Mmm, Anyone know what's the insurance rule is for showroom vehicles, and does the dealer have to keep a record of drivers taking it out for a spin?
I'm guessing this is heading down the same route as that bloke who got rear ended by a courtesy car (no pun intended). The difference being that there's a good mugshot of the driver. Trying to Identify the driver through social media may get interesting.
MOT is 3 years. Highly unlikely it's a showroom vehicle. The lass in the passenger seat looks duly unfazed. As an aside showroom vehicles are usually fully comp with any driver. I would suggest the lad is a living at home in the basement rent free which allows him to purchase the flash car to be able to show off. It's quids in that it is also uninsured and quite possibly registered to another keeper the toe rag is the one who gets to drive it.
Nothing much the driver can say in their defence. The only question is what the sentance will be.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35422418
Well, there's a swerve onto his side of the road as well, though at lower speed. Only one incident, not 2.
I suspect the answer will be a) not charged or b) a fine.
Checks their local news website for comments... (everyone needs a hobby)
Not bad, but I'm sure they can do better than that. 7/10.
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/moment-BMW-driver-tries-push-Bristol-cyclis...
I hope if he has a driving licence the court removes it for a year, makes him do community service in a not-too-local bike shop and forces him to cycle to the shop to do it.
"My Client was simply adjusting his wing mirror Your Honour".
Yeah, adjusting it with a cyclist on the other side of the road. I dodn't think fat boy will get off with this one. That's a ban right there.
Door mirror.
His electric door mirrror which can be adjusted from inside the vehicle, he just forgot.
More people trying to get a KoM through foul means
"helmet camera footage"
That's a funny riding position
Depends which helmet
That's outrageous, just imagine what would have happen' to the innocent motorist just casualy stretching out through the window enjoying the day if the contact had been made. I had to put the kids in other room so they don't see the horror.
Pages