At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Only £350 a month? I wonder why? (Great car I'm sure, but I hate the recent BMW grille design)
I like the measure of effectiveness of the new Hutch tires, % of wattage improvement. Instead of saying, "28.6 watts at 49.34 km per mile a nano...
Random driver account: "cyclists should be made to wear hi viz like workers do on a building site"....
I obviously haven't!
They don't tend to do that without permission though, do they?
Nice to see Police Scotland clamping down on road traffic offenders https://archive.is/BUiil Oh wait, they just go after the vulnerable road users.
"The algorithm" served me an older JV video last week which I now can't get out of my head....
Is that normal for that spot? Pretty sure sand (and/or other sand-like substances) is commonly used to soak up spilled diesel, so if a load of sand...
Holy thread resurrection Batman!
They really don't, though. They might say they do, but in reality the amount of money involved is a rounding error in the tax budget, and not worth...