- News

“Obstacle course” on car-free cycle street slammed after complaints of “speeding” cyclists on “bicycle-shaped objects” – but council says “slalom” barriers “little impediment to cyclists at normal speed”; Red Bull Tour civil war + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

“Obstacle course” on car-free cycle street slammed after complaints of “speeding” cyclists on “bicycle-shaped objects” – but council says “slalom” barriers “little impediment to cyclists at normal speed”
Fancy cycling to work on a handy car-free road in the city centre? Well, you’re going to have to work on your bike handling skills first.
At least that’s the message currently being shared by Dublin City Council, who this week have decided to spruce up Capel Street and Parliament Street – which for the past four years have been a car-free shared space for pedestrians and cyclists – by adding a few slalom-style obstacles to keep you on your toes.
Earlier this week, 14 of the chicane-style barriers (most of which are essentially made up of a few cones and a bit of tape) were installed in very close proximity to each other on the two streets, in the space of around 500m.
As the brilliant Irishcycle.com reported, the barriers do not comply with the Irish government’s national guidelines on ‘Access Control of Active Travel Facilities’, which require a five-metre gap between chicanes or gates.
According to the council, the chicanes have been put in place temporarily to deal with the “behaviour of a small cohort of people using quite large and powerful e-bikes, and e-scooters”.
Since it was made permanently car-free in 2022 following a Covid-era trial, Capel Street has been the centre of complaints about so-called “speeding cyclists”, though as Irishcycle points out, most of these ‘cyclists’ were referred to as riding “bicycle-shaped objects”. So make of that what you will.
Meanwhile, misreporting and confused signage have led to a misunderstanding among some of the streets’ users over whether they are designed purely for pedestrians.
Following the barriers’ installation, one local wrote on BlueSky: “They’re ugly but they should put something like them permanently on Capel Street to stop those on wheels using it like their own personal race track. some tables and benches or seating and planters all the way up the street maybe?”

Meanwhile, many Dublin cyclists are baffled by their introduction, who claim they have caused more problems by creating conflict with pedestrians at the narrow gaps between the chicanes, forcing them to use the footpath.
Asked for the reasons behind the move, a spokesperson for Dublin City Council said: “The Capel Street Parliament Street route has rapidly become a very key cycle route in the city since the two-way link was put on Capel Street Bridge linking the two sections, and cycling numbers have increased substantially as a result.
“However, along with this increase in cycling numbers has been some problems caused by the behaviour of a small cohort of people using quite large and powerful e-bikes, and e-scooters, and Dublin City Council has become increasingly concerned that the behaviour of a minority of users will lead to unsafe interactions with pedestrians and other users of the street.
“Therefore, a number of measures have been considered, including targeted messaging about the appropriate speeds to use on the streets, increased signage to remind users that pedestrians have priority on the street, and cyclists should slow and give way to pedestrians as required, and these will be rolled out over the next number of weeks.”

The spokesperson continued: “Alongside these measures we are also looking at what may be put on the street to assist in keeping speeds at a reasonable rate commensurate with the usage of the street by all and to inform this we have been trialling putting in some temporary measures to slow speeds and see configurations can make a difference, the chicanes that are being temporarily trialled provide little impediment to a cyclist travelling at a normal speed, but do require the faster users to slow down.
“These are only temporary measures to guide our process for considering if more permanent changes could or should be made and what, if any, these should be.”
Sprint finish!
A day like today didn’t need many updates, so it’s just as well we’ve had multiple plates to keep spinning.
Otruba and Veistroffer kept going until 20km to go when both men shook hands. Thankfully there weren’t any bad crashes today, enabling a clean sprint between the favourites.
Into the final kilometre, Alpecin-Premier Tech were perfectly placed, with Jasper Philipsen at the front when he launched his sprint. But, when you’re launching before Fernando Gaviria, you’ve mistimed your effort. Soren Waernskjold briefly led the field before Tim Merlier, having been expertly piloted by Jasper Stuyven, came round the outside to take what proved to be a comfortable win, his first of the race and his 4th Tour win of his career…
KING OF CHAOS 👑 Tim Merlier wins a frantic sprint in Bordeaux to take Stage 7 of the Tour de France! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/8uf1cxjBJ4
— Cycling on TNT Sports (@cyclingontnt) July 10, 2026
Intermediate sprint!
Finally some action to bring you, (Callum writes, whilst Ryan is mid-air) where Baptiste Veistroffer and Jakub Otruba chose to contest the intermediate sprint. It was very sporting though, each man lined up alongside each other before launching their sprints simultaneously. Veistroffer edging out the Czech rider.
A minute later came the peloton and, despite a very long XDS-Astana lead-out, Mads Pedersen went early and won out, beating Biniam Girmay and Max Kanter to further extend his green jersey lead. He’ll be hoping it hasn’t taken much away from his bunch sprint, which is a little over 50km away. The gap to the breakaway is now hovering just above 30 seconds.
Wiggo’s hot takes: Bradley Wiggins has “sneaking suspicion” Jonas Vingegaard won’t finish the Tour de France
It’s passed me by, I’ll be honest, but apparently Bradley Wiggins is once again spending his Tour de France podcasting with his good mates Lance and Big George.
And Sir Brad of Wiggo isn’t wasting the opportunity in front of the mic (and a few convicted dopers), offering up perhaps the spiciest hot take of the 2026 Tour so far:
“I have a sneaking suspicion… he’s not gonna finish this race.”
Sir Bradley Wiggins shares a bold opinion on Jonas Vingegaard after @TamauPogi’s dominant Tourmalet victory.
Watch the full THEMOVE Stage 6 breakdown.#TDF2026 #TourdeFrance pic.twitter.com/eoPI9Mm9uA
— WEDŪ (@wedusport) July 9, 2026
“We don’t know how Jonas is going to fare over the next two weeks. I have a sneaking suspicion, having watched him today, that he’s not going to finish this race,” Wiggins said, startling even Big Tex himself.
“It is wild, but we’re here to give opinions,” he continued, sounding like a guest on a Channel 5 current affairs panel show.
“I’m not saying that’s going to happen. I just saw a man who was broken today and the last couple of years he’s remained positive in second place. He said, ‘I’m going to take this race, I’m going to push him to Paris’.
“I mean, how many years do you want to do that and finish second? There’s not much he can do in this race.”
If Brad keeps this level of hot take up every day, I’m not sure he’ll be able to make it to the end of the Tour, let alone Vingegaard…
Give it a rest, Baptiste!
Right, who’s got hold of the Baptiste Veistroffer controller?
The Lotto–Intermarché man, a real glutton for punishment, is in the break once again on the road to Bordeaux this afternoon. But at least this time he’s with another rider, Caja Rural’s Jakub Ortruba. Which must be a relief, because the route ahead looks a touch uninspiring (unless you’re a sprinter)…

“This is really not the ending we wanted for this yellow adventure”: Former Tour de France leader Torstein Træen out of race after suffering concussion and broken ribs in Tourmalet crash
You have to feel for Torstein Træen. The Norwegian’s extremely popular spell in yellow – which many of us, including myself, expected to last quite a while – was curtailed first by the might of UAE Team Emirates and Tadej Pogačar and then by a nasty crash on the descent of the Col du Tourmalet.
In what now appears to be a rather foolish decision, Træen was allowed to continue to the finish in Gavarnie-Gèdre after seemingly passing a roadside concussion check.

However, following a check-up by his Uno-X Mobility medical team last night, along with analysis of the data from his helmet sensor, and X-rays, the former yellow jersey was diagnosed last night with a concussion and multiple rib fractures, ruling him out of the rest of the Tour.
“This is really not the ending we wanted for this yellow adventure,” Uno-X manager Thor Hushovd said in a statement.
“Torstein has given the team a historic moment, and what he and the whole team have achieved these past days is something we will always be proud of. But after the further checks this evening, it was clear that he could not continue.

“To wear the yellow jersey in the Tour de France is massive for any rider and any team. For Torstein to do that, and to take the jersey over the Tourmalet today, is something very special. It is of course disappointing to leave the race like this, but now the most important thing is that Torstein gets the care and recovery he needs.”
Hinault and LeMond, Temu edition: Remco rage rocks Red Bull as angry Evenepoel chastises teammate Florian Lipowitz over lack of co-operation in Pyrenees
Alright, maybe that headline is a bit harsh.
But it’s clear that all is not well at Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe at the Tour de France. After losing the sprint for third, and four bonus second, at Gavarnie-Gèdre to Isaac Del Toro, Remco Evenepoel didn’t hold back when it came to his teammate and Red Bull co-leader Florian Lipowitz.
Lipowitz was also in the group of GC contenders who crossed the line around 20 seconds down on Jonas Vingegaard, and trailing Tadej Pogačar by just under three minutes. And according to Evenepoel, the German refused to lend him a hand when it came to contesting for those bonus seconds at the line.
“I had asked for a lead-out, and I didn’t get one,” the Belgian told Sporza at the finish line (am I the only one hearing shades of Paul Kimmage at a Tour of California press conference in that sentence? Oh I am? Okay, carry on Remco…).
“Yes, I was angry, and rightly so. In the Volta a Catalunya, I rode at the front for him for 30 kilometres. I asked him to do one kilometre of work at the front, and that wasn’t possible. That made me angry, and that will need to be discussed thoroughly tonight.”
Evenepoel also didn’t hold back when asked about his rivals, either.
“I understand why Del Toro and Sepp Kuss weren’t riding, but Lidl-Trek was there with just the two of them and they didn’t want to ride right away,” he said.
“I thought: ‘What do you have to lose? If we work together, maybe we can get as far as Jonas’. But a few riders wanted to drag again.
“Paul Seixas said that he didn’t understand why some riders were dragging themselves along. I told him that this is the Tour and that it wouldn’t be the last time.”
Looks like it’s shaping up to be a long few weeks for Remco. Oh, to be a fly on the wall at the Red Bull dinner table…
Red Bull civil war update: Team manager says “heat of the moment” Remco Evenepoel outburst is “not a big thing”
Alright, everyone stand down. Remco and Florian have made up, apparently.
Or at least that’s according to Red Bull boss Ralph Denk, who claims the pair were having a right good laugh about the whole thing over dinner, and not grabbing each other by the throat.

“There was a bit of disagreement and a language barrier, but it also happened in the heat of the moment,” Denk said on the Inside Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe podcast.
“This was after more than 180 kilometres of a mountain stage. It was not a big thing. I saw them afterwards and they had spoken about it.
“They sat together at dinner and were laughing. The subject is being made much bigger than it really was.”
So that’s that, then. Until the next mountain stage.
Magazine front covers that haven’t aged well
Spotted this Red Bull mag in my hotel lobby in Pau this morning:

Evenepoel and Lipowitz’s ‘shared dream’ of winning the Tour together for the team? Hmmm…
“London faces crises of climate, road danger, inactivity-related ill health and far more. TfL needs to make that ‘step change’ now, not later”
Why don’t cyclists use the cycle lane? #902,398
Flimsy plastic wands, the lazy, law-breaking motorist’s friend…

“One day after going in, a driver has already removed one of the wands to park obstructing the cycle lane,” the Car Free Driver account posted on BlueSky, referring to the new plastic bike lane ‘protection’ on Watford’s Ascot Road.
“I have reported it to relevant council officer,” they added. Good luck with that.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
22 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
I've used Challenge, Vittoria, Veloflex and Continental tyres. What stands out for me regarding Challenge is how robust their supple tyres are. Usually there is a tradeoff there, but Challenge somehow manages to keep both.
Well, many of them are more correctly "emit elsewhere". However as we do successfully move away from "coal, oil, and latterly gas and wood" the fraction that is actually emitted does go down. So overall, welcome. (It's complicated... the renewables business is just business like any other so we aren't keen to discuss all the resources being used / new places that get trashed. Example being how much steel (mostly still "dirty") and concrete we need for the new infra. And of course where humans can, they will, as much as they can afford, so Jevons Paradox applies).
RE: Royal Mail 4-wheeled "bikes" - hadn't they been trying to ditch the bikes for ages (like society overall)? When they did they dumped them in favour of vans plus those trolleys. Overall if this means it ends up more "micro-van" rather than "walking plus full size vans" I guess a degree of pedalling is an improvement? When Royal Mail and parking came up before someone said they can ditch their vehicles where they want (if they have to/within reason... but nobody's going to do anything about it). The real issue is all the other commercial deliverers do that anyway. Plus most of the rest of the population...
@david21 Such as this one... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY6fhhmen8w
Will Royal Mail release facts and figures that really matter - costs of acquisition, costs of maintenance, impact on productivity, depreciation, loss of residual value? Zero-emission vehicle means carbon emissions are released upstream.
RE: Royal Mail 4-wheeled "bikes" - should be worried in case they get Fujitsu to manage the routing and logistics...
One thing that's missed out is upgradability. By which I mean, what is the benefit of upgrading my bike? Over the last decade or so , we have had, electronic gears, disc brakes, fully intergrated cable free designs, more aero frames, there has always at lease one reason to eye up an upgrade. Lets use the Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL9. What is the difference between that and the SL8? its so marginal. same can be said for so many new releases. the upgrades are so marginal and when they are always boasted about in ridiculous terms like a 5 seconds saving over 80km averaging 45kph. its preposterous to the average mere human non pro rider. Its like the evolution of the iPhone. the leap in every new model was always worth the cost of upgrading. bigger screens, higher resolutions, better camera etc etc. but now each new model is almost identical to the last and people stopped upgrading every year, to maybe ever y 2-3 years instead with the new contract etc. In the last 4-5 years, with the exception of a few radical bikes like the Factor One or the Colnago Y1RS etc, upgrades are not worth the expenditure. Especially when people are more prepared to buy Chinese instead. Why spend 5 figures on a top end Dura Ace clad superbike from a marquis brand when you can get a very good alternative from China for almost half the price? Its happening in bikes, phones, electric SUVs. Big brands took the piss and now they are paying for their greed.
Not a reply to car drivers but one I do like using on the fairly regular occasions some mean-spirited grumbler complains about bikes on trains (almost invariably when the train is less than half full and the bike is neatly tucked in the legitimate bike space!), muttering, "You've got a bike, why aren't you riding it?" to which I like to reply, "You've got shoes on, why aren't you walking?"
My favorite rude driver retort was when I had two teenage children and there were four cars in my driveway. Driver: Get off the road! Me: How many cars do you own? Just the one? I own four. Get off my road!
@Bungle_52 The ones I have seen don't, as I said they are not much wider than a large cyclist with MTB bars so they can safely (and I presume legally) park on pavements when making their deliveries without obstructing pedestrians, given that, in London at least, segregated cycle lanes almost always run alongside wide pavements. If they were to stop in cycle lanes that would be annoying, although at least they are narrow enough to ride around without having to use the road/pavement, unlike the motorised vans.

22 thoughts on ““Obstacle course” on car-free cycle street slammed after complaints of “speeding” cyclists on “bicycle-shaped objects” – but council says “slalom” barriers “little impediment to cyclists at normal speed”; Red Bull Tour civil war + more on the live blog”
As soon as Mrs H and I saw the Traeen crash (didn’t intend that pun but I like it now) and him being checked over at the roadside we both said that’s it for him, he can’t go on. It was quite clear from the video that he had taken a massive force to his right hand side and his head had banged along the tarmac for a considerable distance, he should never have been allowed to get back on the bike. It’s only sheer luck that the exhaustion and confusion the crash clearly caused didn’t lead to another, worse one. Do the medics have access to the TV footage? If not they should, or somebody who does should be able to get in touch with them, so that they can factor in how bad a crash was if footage is available before letting the rider resume; I don’t think anyone who saw the footage would have been happy to say it was safe for him to proceed.
It does seem baffling that he was allowed to carry on. I wonder if him being in yellow affected the decision.
@AidanR 99% sure it would, the rider would have been desperate to finish the stage to honour his last day in yellow and I’m sure the medics, even if only subconsciously, would have been affected by a desire to let him do so.
@Rendel Harris yeah, the crash was very abrupt. He caught the rear wheel of his teammate and went straight over the top and into a heap. All that force went into the ground instead of along the ground as is sometimes the case.
As to Remco, isn’t this par for the course. He rides angry.
It does somewhat call into doubt the efficacy of the on road concussion protocol.
@Rendel Harris – It would be useful if the medics could access the helmet data as the team did later. Would help in ascertaining if a rider should continue.
@Rezis Definitely, they should be able to get it instantly as doctors in rugby now can with the players’ mouthguards, that would be a significant improvement.
On the track and in circuit races riders can ‘take a lap out’ and rejoin the race. There needs to be a similar protocol for road races to give time for riders to be properly assessed before continuing without the pressure of having to chase on without assistance.
@ChasP I suggested a while ago – it was at the time of the big crash in the Giro when Adam Yates clearly shouldn’t have been allowed back on his bike, another one where as a TV viewer I could clearly see he was concussed but apparently the medics could only work that out the next day – that in order to have full comprehensive concussion checks without time pressure and without the rider panicking and trying to force the medics to hurry, any rider delayed by having to undergo concussion testing should be allowed to get a free sticky bottle ride from his team car or the commissaires back to the group they were in when they crashed.
RE: Dublin street barriers – if “anti-social types” is your problem then the answer is unlikely to be “put in something they’ll either see as a challenge, or just ignore and find another way of causing trouble (possibly right *outside* of the barriers)”
It sounds as Dublin is experiencing visits from UFO cyclists.
“It was bicycle shaped. I’d never seen anything like it before. It emitted a low hum and then streaked through a red light at an unimaginable speed – probably several times the speed of sound!”
“Dude. Pretty confident I could bunny hop those barriers!”
@chrisonabike …and Dublin City Council also using the incorrect language that the BBC are fond of, talking about “people using quite large and powerful e-bikes” when they mean illegal electric motorbikes. Doesn’t surprise me that DCC can’t get that right, they’re one of the worst local authorities in Ireland for transport solutions (which is really saying something), and were a not-insignificant proportion of the reason that I moved out of Dublin a few years ago.
@Type17 Is the Irish legislation on electric motor bikes and scooters etc. actually the same as in the UK?
@Didsbury Yes, almost identical – bikes with throttles, >250w motors, assistance past 25km/h / 15.5mph are illegal electric motorbikes, not EAPCs/Pedelecs. I think that the only difference here is that private e-scooters, limited to 20km/h (and other limitations like weight, power, etc), are legal in the RoI for 16+ year-old riders, but enforcement is almost non-existent and illegal e-bikes and scooters are as common as legal versions. I asked a guy with an e-scooter which had full suspension and looked very fast/heavy what its actual maximum speed was, and he admitted that it could do 75km/h / 46mph.
@Type17 thanks for that
“along with this increase in cycling numbers has been some problems caused by the behaviour of a small cohort of people using quite large and powerful e-bikes, and e-scooters”
Would they be of the sort which can only be used on private land (with some caveats)? If so, the answer is not chicanes that affect everyone. These barriers also get in the way of existing road infra and markings making it harder to read e.g. give ways. My favourite is this bit where they’ve placed a barrier precisely where the keep left sign instructs you to go.
Id not really noticed before, but watching today’s weird breakaway, the skinniness of the bikes, there’s just nothing there. Head badges being quite superfluous…
Umm, didn’t want to risk the paintwork I guess.
“There was a bit of disagreement and a language barrier, but it also happened in the heat of the moment,” when Denk thinks readers are dicks. Remco was pissed off big time for good reasons. The man needs to attend Trump’s communication crisis sessions where one learn that a humiliating military defeat can be turned into a media resounding victory.
The problem with capel street is food delivery people on electric motorbikes flying down it. I work near it and walk there frequently and it’s a big problem. As for Wiggins, how was his jiffy bag? Still waiting for him to have his say. Also wondering how his charity that paid for his event went tits up.
Re the Dublin Capel St barriers.
Once again, we see the actions of selfish bastards spoil it for everyone else.
Sooner the Gards really crack down on over-powered Illegal ebikes in the towns, the better. I even say this as the owner of one, but I’m out in the sticks and I don’t ride like a twat.