Rishi Sunak – described by his supporters just last week as “the most pro-driver chancellor in history” – is also “an avid supporter of cycling” according to his backers in response to an inquiry from the group Conservative Friends of Cycling.
> Rishi Sunak pledges to “stop war on motorists” and review LTNs
The group wrote to the former Chancellor, as well as Tory leadership rival and strong favourite to succeed Boris Johnson as Prime Minister Liz Truss, to ask their views on cycling, putting the following four questions to them:
Do you support the Government’s ‘Gear Change’ policy and policy objective that 50 per cent of all journeys in towns and cities should be walked or cycled by 2030?
What measures would you support to promote modal shift towards cycling and walking?
What personal experience do you have of cycling?
Will you continue to support Active Travel England?
In response, Team Rishi outlined active travel funding announced by Sunak during his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer under outgoing Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is notably pro-cycling.
The reply said that Sunak would continue current cycling policy and support Active Travel England, the body created earlier this year and headed by Chris Boardman.
However, it did not outline how Sunak, who last year revealed he starts each day with a 6am Peloton workout, planned to get more people on bikes to help meet that Gear Change target.
His team said: “Rishi is an avid supporter of cycling and loves cycling around Yorkshire with his daughters. As Chancellor, Rishi announced £710 million of new investment in active travel funding over the next three years, in the last Autumn Budget. This funding will deliver hundreds of miles of high quality, segregated cycle lanes, provide cycle training for every child and deliver an e-bike support programme to make cycling more accessible.
“This builds on a £338 million package Rishi announced in July last year, which is already delivering high-quality cycle lanes and aiding the delivery of new schemes to encourage walking. In total, the investment that Rishi provided as Chancellor will allow over 1,000 miles of safe and direct cycling and walking networks to be delivered by 2025.
“Rishi has taken investment in cycling and walking to £2 billion over the course of this Parliament and, as Prime Minister, would continue to ensure that the investment is in place to support cycling and cyclists.
If successful in this campaign Rishi will continue to support cycling policy and ensure Active Travel England is able to continue the good work started by the government,” the statement concluded,
Just last week, Sunak pledged to halt what he termed “the war on motorists” if elected leader of the party next month.
> Rishi Sunak pledges to “stop war on motorists” and review LTNs
He also said he would review low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), halt the rollout of smart motorways, and tighten regulation of private parking contractors.
Sunak, who trails Liz Truss in the polls in the leadership contest which will be decided by Conservative Party members, has been described by his supporters as the “most pro-driver Chancellor in history.”
“The UK is a passionate driving nation because driving provides freedom,” he said last week.
“We need to stop making life difficult for the vast majority of people across the UK who rely on a car as their primary source of transport to healthcare, employment and other essential day-to-day things.
“As Chancellor, I introduced the largest cut to fuel duty in a generation, and as Prime Minister I will go further so that we stop the war on motorists once and for all,” he added.
His comments saw his supporters applaud him as “the most pro-driver Chancellor in history.”
Truss has yet to provide her reply to the questions put to her by Conservative Friends of Cycling.

37 thoughts on “Rishi Sunak “an avid supporter of cycling” claim his supporters”
Quote:
Fixed.
“Rishi is an avid supporter
“Rishi is an avid supporter of cycling and loves cycling around Yorkshire with his daughters.”
In the same way he buys discontinued mcdonalds wraps for his girls ?
hirsute wrote:
And is an avid supporter of a football team (can’t be ars$d to check) but doesn’t know who they are playing later that day.
Probably just watched the IT
Probably just watched the IT crowd for football knowledge
Has Rishi discovered that
Has Rishi discovered that some of the tory party voters ride bikes?
Still, at least he could be bothered to answer, unlike Truss, who won’t even do that. Nothing at all like Boris running away from reporters with nasty questions. Still, we do know that she’s in favour of dropping green levies.
You could say that Rishi has
You could say that Rishi has just followed a Boris pattern – always have two versions of everything! Politicians are smart – save effort and copy what someone else found works. Not answering is also a requirement – Blair diverted, Boris blustered and dead-catted, Truss just doesn’t answer (not sure how Sunak gets by). Variations on a theme.
The troubling bit is we’ve * got to choose between an “avid cyclist” and … what was Truss’ take on cycling again, I really don’t know (but suspect it’s not helpful)?
EDIT * A couple of hundred thousand Conservative party members have to choose – no choice for anyone else ’till next election.
Youcan’t beleive a word any
You can’t beleive a word any politician says especially the ones in this Govt. as they are prone to U turns and being misquoted, so all this is just nonsense
I before E, except after C.
I before E, except after C.
Cocaeni?
Cocaeni?
biker phil wrote:
The English language is not an exact science and one rule is not usually sufficient.
NOtotheEU wrote:
Youve seized an opportunity there to point this out.
mark1a wrote:
Indeed, humans can be a pedantic species. Maybe it even improves our society.
NOtotheEU wrote:
????
E before U, except in
E before U, except in countries determined to tank their economies and harm their own interests.
Not fussed.
Not fussed.
steaders1 wrote:
— steaders1I think you mean quoted, as in when they do the exact opposite of what they said they would do a week ago.
Meanwhile the York & North
Meanwhile the York & North Yorkshire Routemap to Carbon Negative says we need to cut car usage in the region by 48% by 2030.
The crazy thing is we could
The crazy thing is we could reduce the number of car journeys by roughly that amount just by increasing the average car occupancy to 2.
Good point, I notice Ford UK
Good point, I notice Ford UK have almost got the message so maybe they won’t mind if I borrow their advert and improve it:
I recall a popular comic was
I recall a popular comic was doing an advertising campaign about that a few years back too:
Wasn’t there something
Wasn’t there something similar in WW2? “Drive alone and you drive with Hitler”
Road.cc reported a modern
Road.cc reported a modern remix, substituting “Putin” for “Hitler”.
Don’t know if they are still
Don’t know if they are still there, but outside all the USAF bases in East Anglia used to be a bus stop with poles of revolving common destinations on.
As a pedestrian, all you had to do was stand in this shelter, select your destination and a passing driver would pick you up and give you a lift.
Hitchhiking without the faff of sticking your thumb out.
For some reason, it was only popular among the USAF personnel…
Were the locals were
Were the locals were complaining that this was a list of targets for American conquest?
In theory yes, but that only
In theory yes, but that only works for regular, predictable trips like commuting, which is 15% of car journeys.
It’s also hard to achieve. We have signs at the entrance to town exhorting people to car share, but I doubt it has a big effect.
York & N Yorkshire’s plan relies on demand reduction and mode shift.
Whilst cars remain privately
Whilst cars remain privately owned and human driven that’s probably the case.
When private cars are largely replaced by self driving taxis I expect the average occupancy will rise rapidly.
I hope we can get ahead of
I hope we can get ahead of that curve by treating workplace parking as a benefit in kind. Where I work, it costs about £20 a day in a nearby car park*. If those who have a permanent space in the office car park* (which has about 1 space per 6 employees) were taxed on that £5000 a year freebie, their transport choice might change.
Linking the BIK figure to local parking costs so that out of town business park* workers would have much lower costs than city fat cats would seem fair.
*Why do we use the word “park” to mean these hideous areas of asphalt and cheap building?
“Park” in the sense of
“Park” in the sense of “parking a car”, innit.
Is there no end to the war on
Is there no end to the war on the poor motorists…
I actually agree. My workplace has a truly enormous car park. The maintenance costs alone must be astronomical. A small contribution towards its upkeep from those who use it wouldn’t seem unreasonable. Or taxation on the BiK if they decide to keep it free.
A Workplace Parking Levy (WPL
A Workplace Parking Levy (WPL) is a charge on employers who provide workplace parking, a type of congestion charging scheme that has been introduced in Nottingham.
Charge for next WPL licensing period confirmed as £458.
https://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/information-for-residents/transport-parking-and-streets/parking-and-permits/workplace-parking-levy/
Has it had any effect?
Has it had any effect?
Dunno. Probably going to be a
Dunno. Probably going to be a foi for that.
It’s been a huge success and
It’s been a huge success and has helped fund eg public transport infra, cities including Leicester and Oxford as well as LB Hounslow are looking at doing similar initiatives … very interesting article here.
https://www.transportxtra.com/publications/parking-review/news/68005/the-workplace-parking-levy-nottingham-pioneers-the-way-ahead/
You are of course referring
You are of course referring to this?
https://road.cc/content/news/self-riding-bikes-could-transform-public-bike-share-schemes-293343
Amazing that such a business
Amazing that such a business dominated body could reach that conclusion; maybe the human race isn’t doomed.
Yes. The test then is whether
Yes. The test then is whether it actually gets implemented.
Strava or it didn’t happen.
Strava or it didn’t happen.