Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
tell someone where you’re
tell someone where you’re riding, and roughly when you expect to be back
Oh dear! Not this again (usually, it’s in connection with mountaineering or even walking). An alternative view is: don’t ever do that, as I have never done.
Wow! This makes the Hero 7
Wow! This makes the Hero 7 Black look good- you just take the battery out and the other one in in 5 seconds. And you still have to suffer the dire GoPro Quick PC software as well!I know the Met won’t
I know the Met won’t prosecute a red light run unless it’s clearly three seconds after the lights turn red
No, I think it’s my point that remains.
Wouldn’t it have been so much
Wouldn’t it have been so much better if LCC had explained the situation to wtjs as clearly as you. The problem, in a nutshell then, is that a good lawyer can get a motorist off almost any traffic offence in court
Not always, unless Rendel claims that CyclingMikey or the Met is lying!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8zegSOp2s4
You have posted single images
You have posted single images (every time you post something it is a single image) and then telling us we can’t interpret the video properly
It’s difficult to read rubbish like this without laughing. The only files which can be posted at will on this site are png gif jpg jpeg. YouTube is indeed the place for video and I am working up to my channel Bad Cops: The Preston Connection. The people who actually post images here, which are purely for entertainment and information and not for proof, will already be aware that these are still image formats. I can see why the site doesn’t allow random video images, because topics would soon be filled with rubbish, and they don’t have the resources of YouTube to cope with that. What they could do is allow people to upload and download .pdfs which could include a succession of images- I’m already making those for my own record purposes, although I don’t send them to Lancashire police any more. They demand pure video without any overlay, and that’s what they get
What I’m telling several people on here is that they can’t even interpret the still images which I selected and cropped to make it easier for them. Anybody who is any good will be able to see why even the 3 video stills I presented are proof of the red light offence- clue: it’s the white vehicles. However, for the hard-of-seeing, here’s an easier one. This is Toyota IQ ML58 YFK about to go through on red
In response to a letter from
In response to a letter from Ben Wallace MP last year, Lancashire Constabulary undertook to do better on red light offences. The ‘doing better’ consisted of ignoring several bad ones which I have posted on here, and the failure of Sgt. Lavin of OpSnap Lancs to reply to my detailed query on these offences convinces me of this. I then write to Ben Wallace again, asking whether he can do anything other than relay the pathetic Lancashire Constabulary lies back to me- when he says ‘essentially, no’ I then set up the channel on the grounds that I have no alternative
I know the Met won’t
I know the Met won’t prosecute a red light run unless it’s clearly three seconds after the lights turn red
Well, we’ll have to disagree on this! Let’s see your evidence for this assertion- 3 seconds is a really long time at traffic lights. Even if it were true, we shouldn’t be condoning dangerous lawbreaking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y28Fjp9ardU
Little did I realise, when I
Little did I realise, when I initiated this light-hearted New Year topic, that so much nonsense would be written by so few with such over-inflated views of their own image analysis capabilities- there is indeed a job for you at hopelessly inept OpSnap Lancs.This is Jaguar XK-something EW14 VJW crossing the stop line about 1/3 of a second after the lights turned red and 3 1/3 seconds after they turned amber. They’re not going to sue me for libel because they’re guilty. Anyone who has submitted a complaint to the police in the last few years knows that nothing happens without an indisputable video, and mostly nothing happens with an indisputable video, which is indeed what Lancashire Constabulary has. There are many sceptics around- we have anti-vaxxers, flat-earthers, people who assert the moon landings were faked- and they’re all as wrong as people who claim that the incidents I put on here require some sort of judging by participants. They don’t- they’re all exactly what I say they are. You can ignore the topics, you can say you don’t believe the offences etc just as anti-vaxxers can say that vaccines are more dangerous than Covid. However, inept image analysis remains inept.The only point of my topics
The only point of my topics on here is to demonstrate how bent the police are, and how all these people claiming they have achieved ‘action’ from the police have generally only achieved ‘words of advice’ or the joke online driving course. That’s why there are so many hundreds of NMoTDs! I am showing how the police even try to dodge out of unequivocal offences such as red light passing, never mind the offences the bent forces claim don’t exist like close-passing. The ‘new’ Highway Code will make no difference at all. If the site managers allowed us to put videos on at will, I would do it, but as it’s of no interest to me whether people on here ‘endorse’ the proof of obvious red light offences, I’ll save my YouTube videos until I inaugurate my Bad Cops: The Preston Connection channel.It seems you have exactly the
It seems you have exactly the aptitude Lancashire Constabulary is looking for! An ability to deny the facts while you have the indisputable video in front of you
No, no uncertainty here!
No, no uncertainty here!
Rule 175
You MUST stop behind the white ‘Stop’ line across your side of the road unless the light is green. If the amber light appears you may go on only if you have already crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to stop might cause a collision.
Rule 178
Advanced stop lines. … If your vehicle has proceeded over the first white line at the time that the signal goes red, you MUST stop at the second white line, even if your vehicle is in the marked area…
This is 1/3 second later, as shown by the white van in the background
There seems to be some
There seems to be some confusion between the Stop Line and Advanced Stop Line, and not only at OpSnap Lancs!
Test Image
Test Image
this sort of thing is
this sort of thing is happening more often
The infamous A6 traffic lights in Garstang, scene of the Lancashire Constabulary competition for who can enter the junction the longest time after the lights turned red, recently experienced a collision with the pole holding the lights which is now bent. Unfortunately, I wasn’t there when it happened- it was someone turning right off the A6 who hit the nearside lights on the road he was turning into. Presumably he was aiming for the winner and travelling pretty fast.
No, thanks! I’ll stick with
No, thanks! I’ll stick with the Marathons
