mdavidford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 685 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • mdavidford

    That does appear to include

    That does appear to include empty properties that are unsafe or uninhabitable, and may be unviable to restore, though – can’t seem to find any kind of estimate on how many that accounts for.

    You’d also need to consider where those homes are, and if they’re in suitable locations to provide for unmet demand.

    That said, it probably still leaves a good chunk that could make a sizeable dent in the shortfall.

    in reply to: My Palmares #988647
    0
    mdavidford

    You’ll probably need some ice

    You’ll probably need some ice on that foot after a week of kicking things.

    mdavidford

    Shouldn’t that be ‘the bile

    Shouldn’t that be ‘the bile-filled organ of hate, the Guardian’, or something like that?

    mdavidford

    When did turning the heater

    When did turning the heater on become a ‘de-icing hack’?

    in reply to: Proviz – demographics #988767
    0
    mdavidford

    Is it suffering from long

    Is it suffering from long Covid?

    in reply to: Fly6CE mounts #988639
    0
    mdavidford

    I’d have thought you’d have

    I’d have thought you’d have wider options in the first place for a camera to attach to a helicopter.

    in reply to: Flat mount disc brakes on post mount frame #988589
    0
    mdavidford

    You should drink within at

    You should drink within at most 2 months of opening.

    in reply to: Does road.cc need more “Britain’s Killer Roads” threads? #988599
    0
    mdavidford

    Discuss.

    Discuss.

    in reply to: Accurate VO2 Max for Zwift and Strava #988509
    0
    mdavidford
    hawkinspeter wrote:
    mdavidford wrote:
    Ride On wrote:
    Am I missing something? What is the device?

    A MacGuffin

    I thought a MacGuffin is a plot device, similar to Checkhov’s Pistol

    It is – a device.

    in reply to: Accurate VO2 Max for Zwift and Strava #988503
    0
    mdavidford

    Ride On wrote:

    Ride On wrote:
    Am I missing something? What is the device?

    A MacGuffin

    mdavidford

    Yeah – fair enough – for some

    Yeah – fair enough – for some reason I had in my head that the original quote said ‘charged with’.

    in reply to: Which Garmin #987325
    0
    mdavidford

    “I can’t think of a case

    “I can’t think of a case where [anyone would] need it” =/= “I don’t need it”. It is possible to try to consider use cases other than your own. Obviously, it possible that you may miss some, but then Secret_squirrel didn’t claim that there were no cases – only that they couldn’t think of any.

    in reply to: Trying to figure out a driver’s logic #988441
    0
    mdavidford

    To build anticipation.

    To build anticipation.

    in reply to: Start of this year 2022? #988397
    0
    mdavidford

    I’d guess the level of race

    I’d guess the level of race they mean is ‘included in the fantasy league’.

    mdavidford

    The offence in law may be a

    The offence in law may be a single one of being unfit to drive through drink or drugs, but that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have been charged separately with being unfit through drink and being unfit through drugs. Just like if you stole three bikes you’d be charged with three counts of theft.

    Oh, wait… in that case you’d be charged with no counts… hang on… what was the point I was making again…?

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 685 total)