HoarseMann

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 301 through 315 (of 557 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Anyone else got Bolt B’tooth problems? #990359
    0
    HoarseMann

    If you think it is the mobile

    If you think it is the mobile connection, then try forcing your phone to use 3G in the mobile settings, if that’s no better, then you could even try 2G – location data is a very small payload.

    I recently dropped my phone back to 3G as they were working on the local 4G mast. What a revelation! It seems nobody uses 3G anymore, so whilst it might technically be slower than 4G, the lack of contention with other users means it’s actually very fast (especially latency). It also uses a bit less battery and has a slightly longer range. I’m staying on 3G now until they turn it off!

    in reply to: Unfriendly And Littering Sportive Riders? #990129
    0
    HoarseMann

    Coming from mountain biking,

    Coming from mountain biking, which is generally a very friendly and collaborative scene, I noticed some road cyclists could be quite frosty, serious and extremely competitive! I think they are still the minority, but I suspect now greater in number, more likely to be drawn to sportives and more focused on doing a good time than having a good time.

    in reply to: Unfriendly And Littering Sportive Riders? #990083
    0
    HoarseMann

    Looks like it could possibly

    Looks like it could possibly be the tour of lancs you encountered. Maybe the glum faces were those 2/3rds of the way into the 160km route, contemplating whether their winter training had been enough to see them through to the finish.

    No excuse for the litter though.

    HoarseMann

    Yes, they do consider the

    Yes, they do consider the impact of the charge on the perpetrator before deciding what the charge will be. In the case I refer to, eventually the police were of the opinion it was upper-end careless and lower-end dangerous driving. They said getting a conviction for dangerous is really difficult as it’s an automatic 12 month ban, plus it would mean CPS involvement. So they went for the easier careless charge. I do also wonder if the driver already had points, as they only gave him 5 points rather than 6, was that tactical so he just missed the 12 point ban?

    HoarseMann

    yep, it’s not the norm. I had

    yep, it’s not the norm. I had to do quite a lot of polite pestering.

    I just can’t believe they think a driver awareness course is appropriate. If the driver really did just pass their test 2 weeks ago, they’ve literally just completed an intense period of driver training. How on earth can a ‘refresher’ course be deemed any benefit, can they really have forgotten how to drive after 2 weeks!

    It makes a mockery of the 6 point limit for new drivers. People lose their licences for using a mobile phone when driving in the first 2 years, which is a serious offence, but not as bad as failing to stop (or even slow) for a pedestrian crossing.

    HoarseMann

    I’m not sure if the police

    I’m not sure if the police can withdraw the offer of a driver course. I suspect they probably can if it hasn’t gone ahead yet.

    HoarseMann

    It sounded to me like the

    It sounded to me like the driver course was the police’s opening gambit and there might still be time to challenge it.

    When I got close passed, the police wanted to send a warning letter. I was livid! I asked to escalate and got up to an inspector, who then offered a driver course. I then spent 30mins on the phone convincing him that this warranted more than that. Eventually, it went to court, police-led careless driving and the driver got 5 points and a hefty fine.

    HoarseMann
    Rendel Harris wrote:
    Unfortunately, as far as I’m aware, there is no real mechanism whereby a victim can challenge a traffic penalty decision.

    It’s hard to challenge a decision, but you do have the right to do so under the victims code of practice.

    When considering an out-of-court disposal option, the police must ask the victim their opinion on this. If the victim is unhappy about it, then that must form part of the police’s decision making. Ultimately, the police can decide what to do, but if they don’t ask the victim and fail to consider their view or justify their actions, then they will not have followed due process and a police complaint could be raised.

    https://road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/Screenshot 2022-03-15 at 16.54.56.png

    HoarseMann

    This is appalling from the

    This is appalling from the police. It makes you wonder if the driver knows someone in the force. To offer a driver improvement course for this monumental failure to operate a vehicle safely, and the consequences that are every parents worst nightmare, is a dereliction of duty in my opinion.

    I would try and discuss with the inspector overseeing the case the options for a charge. There is a charge of causing serious injury by dangerous driving. A broken wrist would meet the threshold for serious injury (GBH) and passing a car stopped on zig-zags at speed could be dangerous driving (although only momentary, it can still be considered dangerous). This would need CPS backing to proceed to court.

    A lesser option would be careless driving. This can be a police led prosecution, they do not need to involve the CPS, but it will need to go to court to have a chance of the maximum 6 points (I think this warrants more than the 3 points and £100 of a FPN).

    Failing that, you could contact the Essex PCC (although there’s a limit to what they might do), and also raise a complaint via IOPC (the admission of the collision investigator that he had done the same, could be seen as bias). Good luck and a speedy recovery to your son.

    HoarseMann

    Third time’s a charm… Title

    Third time’s a charm… Title – the car did it. Photo caption – the car did it. Opening sentence – ah, it was the driver after all!

    in reply to: Contents insurance #989899
    0
    HoarseMann

    I got mine insured through

    I got mine insured through buildings and contents with Aviva. IIRC, they just wanted the replacement (new) value of the most expensive bike. Didn’t have to list them all. Covered at home or when out (in UK), as long as it is locked up. Quote was competitive. Excess is quite high at £350, but I’m happy with that as I really do take care of my stuff, insurance is just damage limitation should the worst happen.

    in reply to: Garmin Varia Radar data analysis #989693
    0
    HoarseMann

    Neat! Spotted a table of

    Neat! Spotted a table of aggregated stats on their website.

    https://www.mybiketraffic.com/stats/countries

    Average number of overtakes per ride in the UK is 102.

    HoarseMann

    I think it’s had a bit of a

    I think it’s had a bit of a polarising effect. The cautious majority have become even more careful, but the reckless idiots seem to be emboldened to drive closer and faster than before.

    In the last month, I’ve had two drivers angrily beep at me for absolutely no reason other than I was on the road ahead of them. One then swerved to side-swipe me whilst holding down the horn (police report submitted – I must chase it up!).

    HoarseMann

    Yep, I agree. I’m not 100%

    Yep, I agree. I’m not 100% against a toot on the horn in the situation you describe, I just don’t think it was warranted in this particular scenario.

    HoarseMann

    Yep, I do really think the

    Yep, I do really think the problem is Ashley hasn’t got much experience cycling, he says so here… https://youtu.be/J9RJfhVVe2A?t=33

    I don’t think he quite gets defensive cycling techniques and just sees agressive/arrogant rather than assertive riding.

Viewing 15 replies - 301 through 315 (of 557 total)