Chris Froome reveals Rapha’s 2016 Team Sky kit

@kingleo So by that logic, if they're forced to carry bottles of fulminated mercury in their pockets they will never crash? I think you just solved the problem!

@mdavidford No, you're confusing it with liquified steam.

@Zebra It's in the article. The airbag can be quickly deflated again.

The more safety gear the riders wear, the safer they feel, the more risks they will take, the more often they will crash.

I thought Laura did well, and capped the bullshit firehose effectively - especially as she had never had an attempted mugging from a far-right shock-jock before. Her "the Netherlands was not the Netherlands in the 1970s" is a genius point, which I will remember. She could have added "Why do you want to live in a Carry On film" if she wanted to put JHB back in her hot air balloon.. But nonetheless - enjoyable, even though personally I probably preferred Laura's debagging of Richard Madeley on Jeremy Vine iirc with sheer logic.

If a pro hits the deck wearing one of these and is uninjured apart from some road rash, will he or she be able to jump back on and keep riding? Or will it be necessary to wait and change into a new jersey / skinsuit? That could be a deciding factor for their use in elite races.

My greatest fear is being struck from behind while cycling. If this demonstrably reduces injuries from such an attack, I want one. Anything that improves safety gets my support.

As I think that poster liked to remind us, explosion in the hi-viz aisle of Decathlon is also a big risk for cyclists.

@IanGlasgow indeed - my point was really just in answer to the reviewer's apparent surprise they didn't add discs - but the Kinetic kits show it actually requires quite a lot of change.

...And another one turning up on a bicycle to another former poster's soirée and then being hurt by his reaction?