Like this site? Help us to make it better.


SRAM Red AXS 2024



Easily one of the best groupsets out there – if not THE best – thanks to its stunning performance, ergonomics and looks
Impressive braking power from new lever design
Great ergonomics boost comfort
Multiple crankset lengths
Backwards compatible with previous Red
Bulkier mech size than Dura-Ace
Contact: Recommends

This product has been selected to feature in recommends. That means it's not just scored well, but we think it stands out as special. Go to recommends

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

For this latest release of SRAM's range-topping groupset, every component has been tweaked. Many of those tweaks are subtle, bringing a little refinement to the overall package, while others are much more pronounced, and they all combine to make SRAM Red AXS a stunning groupset both in terms of performance and ergonomics. The weight and price are also competitive, especially bearing in mind that a full groupset includes Hammerhead's brand new Karoo bike computer.

SRAM hasn't updated Red for quite a few years, and with the release of a new Force group last year it was only a matter of time before this groupset was announced to reaffirm Red as the flagship model, with improved performance, weight and ergonomics. It was definitely worth the wait.

I'll go through the exact details, component by component, in a second, but firstly let's take a look at how it performs as a complete group, on its own and against the competition.

SRAM sent us the new groupset about a month ago fitted to a Canyon Ultimate CFR frameset with Zipp 303 Firecrest wheels and the latest Goodyear Vector tyres, which means that even though the official launch is today, I've had plenty of time to use it and really get to know it. On top of that, thanks to plenty of review bikes passing through my hands this month, I've also been able to ride it side by side with Campagnolo's Super Record Wireless and Shimano's Dura-Ace.

Please, there really is no need to thank me – I'm willing to put myself through such hardships for you, our readers!

The biggest single change with Red is the gear/brake lever unit's ergonomics, and it is probably the largest selling point of the whole groupset for me.

2024 Sram Red AXS - lever 2.jpg

SRAM has moved some gubbins about within the unit's body and the hood size has been reduced by a fair old chunk. I think it's fair to say that SRAM's earlier levers were on the chunky side with quite a pronounced hood shape, but this new unit looks slightly smaller than Dura-Ace's from the side.

It makes the lever units incredibly comfortable to use, allowing a natural position for my hands to settle into regardless of how I'm riding at the time. Whether climbing or descending, my hands always feel secure, even at high speed on poor road surfaces, and the brake levers are always within easy reach.

2024 SRAM Red AXS - bar and lever.jpg

The new design has also improved the braking performance too, by reducing the amount of pressure you need to apply to the lever for a given amount of stopping power. SRAM claims single-finger braking and, trust me, it's a reality.

Like its predecessor, Red is a 12-speed system and still uses the paddle setup where one lever drops the chain down the cassette while the other side brings it back up. Pressing both the right and left at the same time moves the front mech to the opposite position.

It's a style that I have loved since I first used it, and the shifting is quick and precise. Big improvements have been made to the speed and control of the shifting of the front mech, which wasn't exactly slow in the first place.

In terms of performance against the main competitors, I'm sorry to disappoint or look as though I'm on the fence, but there is very little to separate them, although they all have their own personal traits.

The main difference is in the feel of each gear shift. If you have read my previous bike or groupset reviews you'll know that even on an electronic groupset I still like to detect some kind of chain movement as it travels from sprocket to sprocket, or chainring to chainring. I like a bit of mechanical interaction.

Dura-Ace is almost too light for my tastes, I prefer the slightly heavier feel of Campagnolo. Red is somewhere in the middle. Basically, if I had golden hair and was snooping around a bear family's house it would be SRAM's porridge bowl I'd be tucking into.

This is purely my own specific, some would say niche, thoughts on drivetrain performance, mind, we all have different tastes.

Now, I'll take you through the new groupset, component by component, in more detail.

HRD Shift-Brake System including hydraulic calliper

£675 left hand / £675 right hand
Weight: 689g pair

2024 Sram Red AXS - lever 1.jpg

As I said above, the new lever body unit has changed dramatically over the previous model, which you can see in the picture below.

2024 Sram Red AXS electronic groupset shifter design change

SRAM says that it has moved the primary piston from the pommel of the lever into the body of the hood. It's a push-piston design with a higher lever-pivot on the brake lever, which requires less force from your fingers to actuate the brakes.

Compared with the previous iteration, SRAM says this new design requires 80% less effort braking from the hoods and 33% less effort from the drops.

SRAM has also stiffened the two-piece calliper and moved the pressure of the piston and pads further outboard onto a more usable space of the rotor.

2024 Sram Red AXS - rear disc caliper.jpg

The braking performance is very impressive indeed, and smooth too. There's loads of modulation on offer as you get a great feel through the lever which allows you to adapt your braking power to the conditions beneath your tyres.

2024 Sram Red AXS - rear disc brake.jpg

In terms of the hood and lever shape there is also lots of change. The main point, as I said, is the reduction in the size of the hood area. Its circumference is smaller, although the actual length of the upper part of the unit is 5-7mm longer. A much more curved brake lever means that its base still finishes in pretty much the same position as the earlier model. With the clamp mounted in the same position on your handlebar as the old model, the top of the brake lever sits seven degrees higher, giving a more natural position.

2024 Sram Red AXS - lever 3.jpg

SRAM has also built in plenty of adjustment – both in terms of reach (2.5mm) and, separately, pad contact; you can tweak where the lever sits to minimise or maximise the throw of the brake lever before it makes the pads contact the rotors.

2024 Sram Red AXS - lever detail.jpg

Another neat inclusion is the Bonus Buttons found on each lever; you can see them on the inside of each hood at the top. Out of the box each is set as a standard shifter by default, but should you want to you can connect it to any AXS or ANT+ device – using it to scroll through pages on your computer, for instance, without taking your hands off the handlebar.

2024 Sram Red AXS - hood button.jpg

You can set this up via SRAM's AXS app. This app is easy to use and allows you to install the groupset quickly while getting all of the components to speak to each other. You can also personalise how your gear shifters respond and things like that.


£700 no power meter; £1,200 with power meter
Weight: 545g (48/35T, no power meter); 580g (48/35T with power meter)

2024 Sram Red AXS - crank.jpg

The Red crankset is available in two options with either one (1x) or two (2x) chainrings in place.

The 2x is available off the shelf in 50/37T, 48/35T and 46/33T chainring options, and to reduce weight while increasing stiffness the chainrings are a one-piece setup made from aluminium alloy, mated to carbon fibre cranks.

2024 Sram Red AXS - crank detail.jpg

SRAM's take on stock crankset chainring ratios is a little different to, say, Shimano's; Shimano has stuck with the tried and tested 52/36T and 50/34T on its road groupsets, while adding a 54/40T to replace the traditional 53/39T.

With its cassettes generally running a 10-tooth smallest sprocket, SRAM can go with smaller chainrings on the whole without sacrificing speed and those 'power' gears.

I am especially a fan of the 48/35T setup as I find that I can stay in the larger chainring on rolling routes and just find it generally more efficient than the 52/36T or 50/34T on my own bikes. It suits me anyway, as someone who doesn't race any more. I find that the 48/35T covers the spread of gearing I need for general fast road riding without any sacrifices.

Both the 1x and 2x cranksets are available with SRAM's power meter, which gives readings accurate to +/-1.5% and isn't affected by climate conditions. I found it worked excellently with no issues whatsoever, and measures right and left leg power balance.

Thanks to that tweaked front mech, shifting across the chainrings is brilliant, dare I say it, faultless. Even under heavy load the chain switches from one ring to the other without any drag or noise, and you don't need to back off the pedals at all when shifting.

The 1x crankset comes with a 50T aero chainring, and because of that spread of gears on the cassette I have found that SRAM's groupsets work very well as 1x on the road.

Both cranksets use SRAM's DUB bottom bracket design and are available in a large range of crank lengths, including 160, 165, 167.5, 170, 172.5 and 175mm.

2024 SRAM Red AXS - crank 2.jpg

Should the above chainring options not be to your liking then SRAM has you covered with 52/39T, 54/41T and 56/43T builds, and 48T or 52T in a 1x option.

You have to buy these as cranks and chainrings separately: £400 for the cranks, while the chainrings are £800 and include the power meter, or £240 1x without a power meter.

Front Derailleur

£450 (battery not included)
Weight: 145g

2024 Sram Red AXS - front mech.jpg

For 2024 the front derailleur or mech has a narrower front cage which means less distance to move, especially on the outboard shift, which gives a much faster gear change between the two chainrings. Something that is definitely noticeable over the previous version.

Having a narrower cage does mean a higher risk of the chain rubbing it as you pedal, but like other electronic front mechs it has auto trim, which means it will move slightly in relation to where you are on the cassette to avoid chain rub and the noise that comes with it.

The front mech also works with every chainring size option available.

Rear Derailleur

£700 (battery not included)
Weight: 262g

2024 Sram Red AXS - rear mech.jpg

The refined rear derailleur covers cassettes from 10-28T up to 10-36T and has larger pulleys to increase efficiency.

2024 Sram Red AXS - rear mech detail 2.jpg

A neat thing is that it has been designed with both 1x and 2x systems in mind, as it has an Orbit fluid damper which stops it and the chain flailing about, so you don't need to worry about the chain coming off the 1x chainring on account of having no front mech.

2024 Sram Red AXS - rear mech detail.jpg

The front and rear mechs don't look as svelte as they do on Shimano Dura-Ace, and from an aesthetics point of view I prefer DA, but the Red system is truly wireless, so each mech has to carry its own battery.

And when you look at how small the units are overall, they are still very impressive – certainly a lot more diminutive than the Campagnolo Super Record offerings.

Speaking of batteries, SRAM reckons you'll get around 60 hours of riding out of them, although that obviously depends on how many gear changes you make. Charging is simple: you just pop them out and into the charge unit, and even from flat you are only looking at a couple of hours to full.

One cool thing is that both mechs use the same battery (take note, Campag) which means if one goes flat on a ride, you can switch them over to select a get-you-home gear.


£390 all configs except 10-36T, £410; Rainbow £450 (£470, 10-36T)
Weight: 180g (10-28T)

SRAM offers the XG-1290 cassette in four configurations: 10-28T, 10-30T, 10-33T and 10-36T. Loads of options there for all kinds of riding styles.

The downside to offering such wide ratios on each cassette is that the jumps between sprockets can be a little gappy, especially the 10-36T. But SRAM has specced them so you get much smaller jumps towards the smaller sprockets, which helps you keep a smooth cadence speed on rolling terrain, with the bigger jumps at the larger sprocket end where it's not so critical to keep the same cadence as you'll likely be climbing.

I never found myself in between gears, and the shifting quality doesn't change regardless of how big the jumps are.

All the cassettes are designed to fit SRAM's XDR freehubs and come in either the standard silver or Rainbow colour, the latter costing an extra £60.

Red E1 Flattop Chain

£90, Rainbow £110
Weight: 236g

SRAM's Flattop chains have, as the name suggests, a flat top edge. SRAM says this shape allows for a narrower chain with quieter operation. It certainly is a very smooth and quiet setup.

It has dropped 13g over the previous Red chain and uses hollow pins for joining the plates. Those plates are hardened chrome on the inner side for reduced wear, and the chain is joined by a PowerLock connector – you can buy a replacement pack of four for £17. Handy if you are going to be splitting and rejoining the chain on a regular basis.

It's available in both 114 and 126 link lengths, and in either the standard or Rainbow colour finish.

Paceline X Rotor

£70 each
Weight: 140g pair (160mm)

2024 Sram Red AXS - front disc brake.jpg

Not much has changed here: the Paceline aluminium rotors are available in either 140mm or 160mm diameters and mounted to an aluminium carrier.

The only update is to the carrier design. It's smaller, without any aero style channels between the rivet points, which means less material and less weight.

2024 Sram Red AXS - front disc brake caliper.jpg

After an initial bedding in process the braking performance was very impressive, as I said earlier. Quiet too.

Hammerhead Karoo Computer

Weight: 118g

2024 Hammerhead Karoo - routes screen.jpg

Not technically a Red component, but it's designed to offer a huge amount of connectivity with SRAM's kit, and if you do buy a full groupset then Hammerhead's brand new Karoo is included in the price.

You can read my thoughts on how it performed in this separate review.


As you'd expect, Red has been on a bit of a diet for this latest edition so has dropped a few grams, although as the last version wasn't exactly a bloater I wasn't expecting a huge shedding of weight.

The previous version of Red with a power meter was 2,650g while this new one is 2,496g.

SRAM gives a breakdown of which components it includes in that too: a 10-28T cassette, 48/35T crankset with power meter fitted, 114-link chain and all batteries. It also includes hydraulic fluid in the brake lines.

With a standard 48/35T crankset (no power meter) that weight drops to 2,461g.

When we reviewed the Shimano Dura-Ace R9200 groupset with power meter we weighed that at 2,507g.

Campagnolo's Super Record Wireless nudged our scales up to 2,571g (excluding brake hoses but including batteries) when I reviewed it, although that was without a power meter as it has only just been released.

Pricing and value

SRAM Red is available at £3,000 for a groupset. 'A bargain!' I hear you cry, but be aware that doesn't include the crankset or cassette because of the number of possible variations.

Add on £700 for a standard non-power meter crankset and a minimum of £390 for the cassette and you are looking at £4,090 in its cheapest guise.

Although the individual prices for the mechs above show no batteries, if you were to buy Red as a groupset they are included in the price. You will need to add a DUB bottom bracket, though, that fits your bike.

The exact build we have here includes a power meter, which puts the price up to £4,590.

And what all of them also include is one of those brand new Hammerhead Karoo computers, which has an RRP of £450. If you take that into account then Red as a groupset is well priced, I'd say.

Campag's Super Record Wireless costs £4,500 for the non-power meter groupset, and adding one sticks around another grand onto that. So little change from £5,500.

Dura-Ace is a few hundred quid cheaper than Red – it was £4,281.87 with the power meter crankset or £3,631.87 without when we reviewed it in 2021, and a look at current prices shows it's still around that by the time you take into account the addition of batteries and cables – but with Red you are getting the Hammerhead Karoo, which I'd say brings things level.


How does it stack up, then?

Well, I think out of these three range-topping groupsets Red is the one I would go for.

Dura-Ace might have marginally lighter and faster rear shifts if you ride it and Red side by side, but we really are talking about the width of a gnat's appendage here and not enough of a benefit to sway me towards the Japanese brand. Campag – well, I love using that too, but SRAM has matched it in shifter ergonomics and it's expensive.

SRAM has nailed the shape of the levers here and the shifting/braking performance that comes with it. I think it is a stunning looking groupset too, especially the crankset/chainring combo, and the price – while still a chunk of cash – is competitive.

The quality is absolutely top notch throughout. All of the materials that your hands come into contact with feel plush and comfortable, and it has coped with all kinds of poor weather over the last month.

Being completely wireless it's easier to set up, too, and you can also carry spare batteries in your pocket if you were riding some kind of adventure or cycling holiday where you didn't have access to charging facilities.

SRAM has really done a great job with this groupset, improving performance impressively while managing to trim a touch of weight in the process.


Easily one of the best groupsets out there – if not the best – thanks to its stunning performance, ergonomics and looks test report

Make and model: SRAM Red AXS

Size tested: 48/35T chainset, 10-33T cassette

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

SRAM says, "Every part of RED has been refined to create an effortless ride. Light brake feel and comfortable ergonomics, smooth front shifting, fully wireless connectivity, and expanded gearing choices fit every rider and their needs. RED is packed with features, like accurate and reliable power measurement, new shift points, and more brake adjustability, while still shaving grams off every component to bring you the lightest electronic groupset ever. Riding isn't effortless. RED is."

It's a groupset with stunning performance, ergonomics and aesthetics.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

SRAM lists these features:

* One finger braking from the hoods or the drops

* 83 g lighter than previous generation

* AXS enabled for easy setup, personalization, and reliability

* eTap shift logic for intuitive shifting

* Bonus Button provides ANT+ device control or auxiliary shift option

* Optimized hood shape fits the widest range of hand sizes

* Carbon brake lever for light weight

* Textured shift paddles and hoods for control and comfort

* Bleeding Edge technology for easy and clean bleeds

* Reach Adjust to personalize fit for more hand sizes

* Contact Point Adjust to personalize brake engagement

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)
Rate the product for value:

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

It does everything a high-end groupset should. The shifting is fast and precise while the braking offers huge levels of modulation and power.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Newly designed hoods are very comfortable.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product


How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

It is much cheaper than Campagnolo Super Record Wireless in a like-for-like build, and while it's a little more expensive than Shimano Dura-Ace, you do have to take into account that a £450 Hammerhead Karoo computer is included in the Red groupset price.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Definitely

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Absolutely

Use this box to explain your overall score

Personally I think this new Red groupset hits every mark absolutely spot on, to the point where I consider it to be near faultless in comfort, performance and quality, which is why I have no hesitation in giving it 9; it's excellent.

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 44  Height: 180cm  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: This month's test bike  My best bike is: B'Twin Ultra CF draped in the latest bling test components

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed,

As part of the tech team here at F-At Digital, senior product reviewer Stu spends the majority of his time writing in-depth reviews for, and ebiketips using the knowledge gained from testing over 1,500 pieces of kit (plus 100's of bikes) since starting out as a freelancer back in 2009. After first throwing his leg over a race bike back in 2000, Stu's ridden more than 170,000 miles on road, time-trial, track, and gravel bikes, and while he's put his racing days behind him, he still likes to smash the pedals rather than take things easy. With a background in design and engineering, he has an obsession with how things are developed and manufactured, has a borderline fetish for handbuilt metal frames and finds a rim braked road bike very aesthetically pleasing!

Add new comment


Miller | 2 months ago

> One cool thing is that both mechs use the same battery (take note, Campag) 

Minor detail but I understand Campag are locked out of that obviously desirable design through existing Sram patents.

Paul J replied to Miller | 2 months ago
Miller wrote:

Minor detail but I understand Campag are locked out of that obviously desirable design through existing Sram patents.

Cause the idea of having batteries be in a standard size is _so_ innovative!

Ridiculous patent system.

mrml replied to Paul J | 2 months ago
1 like

I don't know this for sure, but I suspect that there was thought to be something innovative in the idea of providing removable batteries on each derailleur in the first place.  Making them interchangeable is an advantage that builds on that feature.  

Backladder replied to mrml | 2 months ago
mrml wrote:

I don't know this for sure, but I suspect that there was thought to be something innovative in the idea of providing removable batteries on each derailleur in the first place.  Making them interchangeable is an advantage that builds on that feature.  

There is so much prior art of things that use standard sized removable batteries that I have difficulty seeing this. I'd like to see Shimano or Campagnolo challenge this rather than just accept it but then that might mean that some of their own dodgy patents might be challenged in return.

Paul J replied to mrml | 1 month ago

standard sized, interchangeable batteries is the norm, across many many many different kinds of products, for many many years now.

But somehow taking that blatantly obvious, normal and long-practiced "idea" and applying it to a new product is "innovative". Shame on the patent lawyers and examiners who allow this to happen - but then, they have a vested interest in foisting this parasitical drag on the economic activity of the rest of society.

mrml replied to Paul J | 1 month ago

I am not as sure as you are that the patent system, in general, is a "parasitical drag on economic activity".  Perhaps you have some evidence to support that claim?

I agree with your point about standard-sized, interchangeable batteries being commonly used in other products.  But if the prior art in bicycle drivetrains was electronic front and rear derailleurs both wired to a single battery housed elsewhere on the bike, then the idea of placing individual batteries on the derailleurs themselves and making them removable and interchangeable was novel.  In my view there is a good argument that this is a non-obvious alternative to, for example, the Di2 system. 

I have no idea whether derailleurs with individual batteries were already prior art in 2012 or whenever the SRAM patents were filed.  If they were, I might take a different view.  

Backladder replied to mrml | 1 month ago
mrml wrote:

 In my view there is a good argument that this is a non-obvious alternative to, for example, the Di2 system. 

It would only be non obvious to a very young child or a fool, it is supposed to be non obvious to someone familiar with that field of engineering.

Blackthorne replied to Miller | 2 months ago

To think such an obvious 'feature' was awarded a patent tells this legal layman that something is seriously wrong with the ease at which patents can be used as tool to stifle innovation and the seeming obliviousness of the issuer to the technological significance (lack thereof) of the patent itself.

SRAM needs to open their battery design to all competitors like they did with the universal deraillleur hanger and innovate by actually innovating rather than creating arbitrary anti-consumer legal obstacles.

Latest Comments