At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
And as for "bottomless bags of money" British cycling has an income in excess of £30 million a year, if they can't manage that sufficiently well to...
I noticed that. Seems to have veered to the right quite abruptly.
I wonder how many would accept the offer of a tree for their front garden?
The headline in the rabidly anti cycling guardian was similar.
Even if these bib tights are the best in the world who can afford them?
That kind of mistake is weasely made
Tediously, I never seem to get anywhere.
Has anyone bought wheels from Light Bicycle? If so what has your experience been?
For the Oxford Mail, it's somewhat surprising that the headline wasn't "How can we get rid of cyclists?" in the first place.
I've just taken to shouting (as has my 6 year old cycling next to me) that people need to turn their lights down. The worst is the strobes on dark...