At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Add new comment
3 comments
Hmm, coupling the words 'windbreaker' and 'undershort'. Have no one in marketing thought about this?
Or maybe it's a reflection on my sense of humour?
Fair point, but if you look at the individual scores you'll see that they only scored a 4 for comfort and the review makes it clear what their failings are.
If they're really that bad, how come they manage to earn 2.5 stars (5/10) - surely they should get less?