At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Private school run in south London linked to 27% rise in air pollution (gRauniad)...
Also, I ordered them towards the end of winter ahead of the summer season, knowing it could be a 3-4 week delivery wait, so planning ahead also helps.
Telegraph readers have a collective meltdown. Is there a max iq to read the telegraph?...
I really don't understand your rant. To me, the Editor's Choice makes sense given that the article even explains what the term means...and the...
Similar, but this one is animated with BOLAS.
Indeed. At ~50% gross margin (not bad for this industry), £7M drop in revenue gives a drop of £3.5M in contribution to other costs. Then spend an...
Slightly embarrassed to say that I have never heard of them, but then I wonder if that might also say something about their marketing reach?
Most people who are sports riding with their friends using an E-assist bike don't need or use the motor assistance on the flat because they are...
I have played Velogames before so will probably go back there too.
Probably a Suffering Bastard, or perhaps for the Velominati types, an Old-Fashioned. Hopefully not a Rusty Nail, anyway....