Like this site? Help us to make it better.

School bike bus being used for “political ends”, claims MSP

Tory MSP Sue Webber has been accused of hypocrisy for arguing that Edinburgh school pupils were “pawns in a political game” over the city’s Spaces for People scheme – two years after praising a similar cycle to school initiative

A Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian has come in for criticism after she claimed that a school bike bus was set up simply to score political points, as a public consultation over Edinburgh’s much-debated Spaces for People scheme draws to a close.

Writing in the Edinburgh Evening News earlier this week, Tory politician Sue Webber argued that “even primary school pupils are being drawn into divisive and sometimes intimidating arguments” surrounding the City of Edinburgh Council’s active travel scheme. 

Funded by Sustrans and constructed in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the pop-up scheme – now known as Travelling Safely – aims to “create more space for people walking, wheeling and cycling” in the city.

The largest of the three roads covered by the scheme, the Lanark Road, has traditionally been viewed as particularly dangerous for cyclists.

In January 2012 keen cyclist Andrew McNicoll died from injuries sustained in an incident involving a parked car and a lorry driver, while riding to work. Following Andrew’s death, his family campaigned for changes to where and how motorists can park on the road. 

> Residents blame increase in motorist-related collisions on recently installed cycle lanes

Since it was first proposed, however, the scheme has come under fire from a group of local residents.

In January last year, the residents group South West Edinburgh in Motion (SWEM) threatened Edinburgh City Council with legal action if construction began on the pop-up bike lanes, and have since blamed a supposed increase in collisions – based on purely on anecdotal evidence and mostly involving motorists alone – on the new lanes. 

In Monday’s article, Webber made the unsubstantiated claim that Lanark Road residents have recently noticed a sharp increase in the number of cyclists, including small children, using the lanes.

“Perhaps it’s a coincidence,” she writes, “they have only started to appear just as another public consultation for the ‘experimental traffic restriction order’ for these changes is due to finish at the end of this week.

“Until very recently, householders along the route have seen very few, if any, young people cycling up the long, steep hill, and any increased general use is more likely to be because the Water of Leith pathway ─ still cyclists’ preferred route ─ is closed for resurfacing.

“But then a leafleting campaign was organised ─ by the same people who organised the ‘Critical Mass’ cycle lane protest this time last year ─ to encourage parents and children to join a ‘bike bus’ from the bottom of Lanark Road to Juniper Green Primary.”

> Edinburgh golf club urges council to remove cycle lane – so members can park on the road 

Webber went on to claim that “a genuine attempt to boost cycling numbers would have started in Baberton Mains where there are more pupils and greater potential to boost safe cycling to school.

“But starting from the most distant part of the catchment area with far fewer children looks like an attempt to prove the coned-off lanes are popular.

“Not surprisingly, other parents complained about what they saw as a deliberate ‘pied piper’ exercise to use children for political ends.

“There is something deeply distasteful in exploiting children in this way.”

Webber’s article, however, has been heavily criticised by her political opponents, who accused the Tory MSP of “significant hypocrisy”. 

In 2020, the then-councillor for Pentland Hills praised a “fantastic” group cycle to school initiative at James Gillespie’s Primary and supported a motion to “support and enable bike buses”.

Incidentally, organisers of the James Gillespie’s bike bus helped those behind the recent Juniper Green scheme with a risk assessment and marshalling assistance.

The SNP’s spokesperson for transport on the City of Edinburgh council, Lesley Macinnes, said Webber’s shift in thinking concerning bike buses “represents significant hypocrisy” and that the MSP was “weaponising volunteer-driven initiatives”.

“Unfortunately, Ms Webber’s disgraceful comments in this latest article represent significant hypocrisy around encouraging children to cycle in this city,” Macinnes told the Edinburgh Reporter. “At a previous committee when she was a councillor, she was very encouraging of children who came to talk about the benefits of a bike bus.

“Her attitude seems to have turned completely in the opposite direction and she is weaponising volunteer-driven initiatives with nothing but good at its heart and which is designed to encourage children to get around this city in a way which benefits them, their health and others around about them.

“In my opinion, bike buses represent a very positive future for this city with increasing numbers of young people feeling that cycling is a good, healthy and greener option for their transport needs.”

> ‘Moronic’: Edinburgh Council to make changes to bizarre zig-zag cycle lane after social media backlash 

Labour councillor Scott Arthur also described Webber’s comments as “disappointing as I thought I lived in a city where everyone wanted children to be able to walk or cycle to school without their parents having to worry.

“I hope she will consider joining the next cycling-bus so she can better understand some of the challenges our young people face.”

The Scottish Conservative politician has since responded to criticisms of her article, which she described as simply raising “legitimate concerns”.

She added: “If Cllr Macinnes had read the article properly, she would have seen I did not criticise bike bus schemes per se, but raised the legitimate concerns of parents that children were being used as part of a highly-politicised campaign to preserve a scheme she forced through which made an already busy road more dangerous.

“She might be struggling with her irrelevance after years of her high-handed policies ignoring community concerns, but it’s pretty desperate stuff to be arguing that it’s fine for adult activists to attempt to manipulate impressionable youngsters.”

Ryan joined in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment


OldRidgeback | 1 year ago

She sounds a bit dim.

Jenova20 | 1 year ago

"In Monday’s article, Webber made the unsubstantiated claim that Lanark Road residents have recently noticed a sharp increase in the number of cyclists, including small children, using the lanes."

Couldn't possibly be the better weather could it? Nope, must be a conspiracy...

mdavidford | 1 year ago

I'm quite an opportunistic person

'Nuff said.

Steve K | 1 year ago

Everything is political.

eburtthebike | 1 year ago

Clearly this story is nonsense, as no tory is ever hypocritical ever, ever, ever; unless there's a y in the day.

chrisonabike | 1 year ago

“She [MacInnes] might be struggling with her irrelevance after years of her high-handed policies ignoring community concerns, but it’s pretty desperate stuff to be arguing that it’s fine for adult activists to attempt to manipulate impressionable youngsters.”

Blimey - hope the MSP's not been to any of them schools.  I'm pretty sure that is exactly what happens in them every day.  Luckily no political parties are involved in this reprehensible activity.

chrisonabike replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago

She's right though - it is political.  It's saying "we want change - we're prepared to do it ourselves if need be, partly to show it's possible."

Just as political as "we want no change; we will continue spending lots of money on the status quo which certainly doesn't benefit everyone".

IanMK replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago

Exactly this. Ideas like, capitalism, the role of the state, neoliberalism, free market etc etc are obviously political ideologies. My personal soap box is the way in which we have increasingly allowed charity to fulfill the responsibilities of government. Particularly as the politically impartial BBC doesn't even pass comment whilst using my license fee to join in.

dreamlx10 replied to IanMK | 1 year ago

You pay the BBC tax ? 

chrisonabike replied to dreamlx10 | 1 year ago
1 like

You'll be asking if he's got a watching licence next!

chrisonabike replied to IanMK | 1 year ago

Amen brother!  Getting charity to do more lifting puts us more in the US direction. Or, indeed, Afghanistan...

IanMK replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago

America is particularly sad. Those great emblems of American engineering like the Golden Gate Bridge ot the Hoover Dam would simply beyond the purse of government today. They are poorer (as a society) for it and so are we.

Let's be honest they couldn't even build a great wall.

chuckd replied to IanMK | 1 year ago
1 like

(ahem) Born and raised Yank here to offer some clarity:

"a great wall" is what was sold to a certain demographic on the grounds and pomises that it would be paid for by the brown people of the country of Mexico. Repeatedly. Ad nauseum.

Then when it was clear the Mexicans were not onboard with that, the defense budget was raided for a couple billion dollars by Executive directive. Meanwhile fundraising was being done by a couple Big Thinkers of that same political party who were later convicted (and then pardoned) for taking the rubes' money and living the high life.

So yeah, we have trouble right now with big projects (a real high speed rail would be nice), but we also are struggling with one party who really, really want to be in power and have the popularity to be so but not the cajones, and another, a minority, who insist God is the way and will try to beat you into submission to see to it.

Where's an American Monty Python when we need them?

Latest Comments