Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

E-scooters five times safer for riders than bicycles, claims RoSPA study

Research from accident prevention charity also finds that risk to pedestrians is lower than is often assumed

A new study from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has claimed it is five times safer to ride an electric scooter than to ride a bicycle – adding that its research showed that the risk they are often said to pose to pedestrians is not borne out by official casualty statistics.

Privately-owned e-scooters are technically classified as motor vehicles and are banned in the UK and can only be ridden on private land with the landowner’s permission, but it is not against the law to sell them and sales have soared in recent years with many ridden illegally on public highways and on pavements – sometimes resulting in confiscation by the police.

Yesterday, transport secretary Grant Shapps told the House of Commons Transport Committee that the government plans to crack down on illegal sales of e-scooters – but added that approved models may be allowed to be ridden on the public highway, with legislation possibly being introduced in the Queen’s Speech on 10 May.

> E-scooters and the law: When and where are you legally allowed to ride an electric scooter?

In England, the Department for Transport (DfT) already permits trial hire schemes of e-scooters, with around 50 towns and cities currently participating in the initiative.

The trial sees people aged 18 and over who posses a full or provisional driving licences able to hire them from operators including Dott, Lime, Voi and Neuron Mobility, with the e-scooters geofenced so they can not be taken out of a specific area, and third party insurance provided as part of the hire package.

Neuron Mobility partnered with RoSPA for its study, which analysed DfT data, including road traffic casualty statistics, and compared e-scooters with other forms of transport.

The research found that collision rates for e-scooters were 0.66 per million miles travelled – five times lower than the rate for bicycles (3.33 collisions per million miles travelled), and nine time lower than that of motorcycles (5.88 collisions per million miles travelled).

> Near Miss of the Day 753: Wrong-way e-scooter rider cuts across cyclist

It also discovered that almost all reported incidents involving e-scooters happened in local authority areas where no rental scheme was in operation, which RosPA said underlined how safe such schemes were proven to be, in part due to the safety checks and regular maintenance and servicing carried out by operators.

The study concluded that:

The key finding is that e-scooters have lower casualty rates compared to other travel modes.
Our findings indicate that the risk to pedestrians is relatively low, despite the common perception.
We also found that there was no significant rise in incidents in the evening, again contrary to the perception that e-scooters are associated with anti-social behaviour around common pub closing times.
Private sales data and a more stable dataset (and a representative ‘average’ travel year to collect data) will enable firmer conclusions to be drawn in future.

Its authors said that “these findings suggest some important safety factors that should be taken into consideration for future E-scooter use in UK,” and made the following recommendations:

Given the rate of crashes that take place on single carriageways, further investment in road design improvements, including segregated bike and e-scooter lanes, would be beneficial.
Safety standards should be applied to improve the visibility of e-scooters on the road, including those that relate to indication, lighting and braking.
Providing mandatory training on the Highway Code and the practical operation of e-scooters would be beneficial for all users.
Awareness and training on e-scooter behaviour for other road users, in particular car drivers, would be beneficial.
E-scooter users should be encouraged to wear helmets when riding.

“Whilst it’s clear from the data available, that e-scooters in general carry a comparatively low risk to third parties and a risk for riders which is less than that of bicycle user’s, safety must remain a focus for everyone involved in the e-scooter industry,” the report said.

“RoSPA encourages all e-scooter operators, and manufacturers of private e-scooters, to increase their focus on safety, including product design and manufacture, passive safety features and rider education programmes,” it added.

“We also encourage riders to follow the rules laid down in the Highway Code and to protect themselves by using lights, good road craft and a helmet.”

RoSPA’s executive head of policy and research, Nathan Davies, said: “E-scooters are clearly set to be a long-term feature of our transport mix and it’s of pressing importance that we understand their impact on road safety and how they can be made safe for everyone to use.

“This report shows that e-scooters compare favourably to other kinds of vehicles and do not represent any greater safety risk to other road users and pedestrians. However, there is still a lot of work that needs to be done to ensure they are integrated on our highways and make sure both e-scooter riders and cyclists are offered greater protections from motor vehicles, which were the source of the vast majority of incidents.

“Rental e-scooter operators, like Neuron, taking part in the Department for Transport’s trial schemes have demonstrated a strong commitment to safety and rider education. However, we need to see these initiatives filter across to private sale models, where the majority of incidents occur, to ensure any wider rollout is done with safety as a priority.”

Neuron Mobility’s UK George regional manager, George Symes, added: “As a relatively new mode of transport there is often a misperception that e-scooters present a greater risk than some other forms of transport, but the data shows this simply isn’t true.

“We welcome RoSPA’s report which shows that e-scooters – particularly rental e-scooters – compare very favourably to bikes and motorcycles when it comes to the number of incidents.

"Neuron’s number one focus is safety. We evaluate every incident that takes place in our cities to assess how we can reduce the risk of it happening again.

“Across the UK we have implemented a range of initiatives to make our operations safer, including an online safety course developed with RoSPA, regular ScootSafe events in city centres and universities and incentives for helmet use and safe parking.

“We know that with the right investment in technology, education and infrastructure, e-scooters can be made even safer and more accessible.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

67 comments

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to jh2727 | 1 year ago
1 like

jh2727 wrote:

Rendel Harris wrote:

One thing that really needs to be sorted is lights, a back light two inches off the ground is no use to anyone, if they are legalized surely mandatory waist-high lights must be part of it?

Why is it a problem if the light is so close to the ground? The only time I could see it would be an issue is when being ridden in a hilly location.

Because in traffic the main view one gets of a scooter rider is from the waist up, lights just above the ground are frequently obscured by other vehicles, e.g., if I'm overtaking a car on my bike it's useful for me to know if there is a scooter on the inside, but I certainly won't be able to see the light at ground level, which I could if it was up higher.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
0 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

jh2727 wrote:

Rendel Harris wrote:

One thing that really needs to be sorted is lights, a back light two inches off the ground is no use to anyone, if they are legalized surely mandatory waist-high lights must be part of it?

Why is it a problem if the light is so close to the ground? The only time I could see it would be an issue is when being ridden in a hilly location.

Because in traffic the main view one gets of a scooter rider is from the waist up, lights just above the ground are frequently obscured by other vehicles, e.g., if I'm overtaking a car on my bike it's useful for me to know if there is a scooter on the inside, but I certainly won't be able to see the light at ground level, which I could if it was up higher.

Like flags on recumbents?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
1 like

My considered opinion - if you need a flag to see a recumbent it's a) too late as you're on top of it and b) time to hand in your lishence as you are clearly filtering out everything except for cars, lorries and presumably the edges of the road.  (Self driving vehicle maybe?  Still looking for the buses to test them...)  In my short experience when you sit on one you become about as salient as if you'd taken off all your clothes.

I don't do much filtering in heavy traffic on mine.  Mostly because it's less fun - because I can't see much / being closer to exhausts / can't track-stand it.

I can't speak for super-low ones e.g. really flat trikes like some racing handcycles.   For slightly taller ones - assuming the motorist is looking at all -  you should be visible enough even at night.  Your head will probably be around a short rider's backside height (don't ask).

I have considered one of the following on occasional rides for additional "clown factor" though:

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
0 likes

I always took the flag is for side approaches for the driver. Two lane dual carriageway and you have emerged from the side road into traffic. Flag indicates something is in the "gap" for the driver in the right hand lane as wing* mirrors might notbe set to reflect that low.

*couldn't resist.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
0 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

My considered opinion - if you need a flag to see a recumbent it's a) too late as you're on top of it

I find flags on recumbents pretty useful as a cyclist because if I'm filtering down the right hand side of traffic and there's a recumbent in traffic on the left, a flag alerts me to their presence when I might not be able to see them over the bonnet of a large SUV, and then I can factor them into any manoeuvre I might be contemplating regarding returning to the left-hand side or moving over to make a left turn.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
0 likes

Good point - but presumably you also cycle with a very tall flag on top of your head in case you're filtering up the inside of a transit / VW camper / lorry and another cyclist is on the outside?

I'm interested they are that much more frequent where you live.  Edinburgh's a veritable hot-bed (hot back?) of recumbents and if I see one every few weeks it's notable.  As I said it's extremely rarely I'd be on mine in any kind of heavy traffic.  I use an upright for most urban transport - more suitable and avoids the more expensive bike getting dinged.  I think it's a rare recumbent rider (alliterative oxymoron?) that would be filtering past the inside of vehicles when approaching junctions - and not because other cyclists might cut in from the right.  No doubt someone will be along to flaunt their recumbent trials skills but personally I've not seen e.g. recumbent deliveroo riders.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
0 likes

brooksby wrote:

Like flags on recumbents?

Good example, yes!

Pages

Latest Comments