Three new signalised pedestrian crossings are to be installed on the Outer Circle of Regent’s Park as part of the Royal Parks’ new ‘considerate cycling’ campaign.
They are advising cyclists to adhere to a code of conduct which includes advising cyclists to “control their speed”, “respect all park visitors” and refrain from riding in large groups.
The three new crossings will be at Monkey Hill Gate, Chester Gate and Kent Passage. According to the Crown Estate Paving Commission, the highest number of collisions occurred at Monkey Hill Gate and Chester Gate.
Over the past five years, there have been 19 collisions in the area, with 18 of these involving cyclists.
The charity, which manages eight of London’s open green spaces, has been outspoken about cyclists since an inquest into the death of a pedestrian who was hit by a cyclist.

In 2022, 81-year-old Hilda Griffiths died two months after sustaining injuries, including broken bones and bleeding on the brain, when she was hit by Brian Fitzgerald at Kent Passage.
The collision happened when Ms Griffiths was crossing the road to a pedestrian island and stepped out in front of a group of cyclists.
The charity’s cycling code of conduct, introduced last year, asks that cyclists not to “ride in excess of 20mph in any circumstance and do not use the park roads for unauthorised competitive cycling”, know the highway code and “respect all park visitors”.
It adds that “all cyclists therefore have a duty in our parks to enjoy their experience in a way that balances their needs with those of our many other visitors.”
The have also asked Strava to remove cycling segments from Regent’s Park, and has asked the government to amend legislation “with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists” in parks.

“The installation of new, signalised pedestrian crossings on the Outer Circle is an important step in improving safety and helping people move around the park with greater confidence,” said Darren Share, director of Royal Parks.
“The Royal Parks are shared spaces, and we all have a role to play. By encouraging road users to slow down, respect speed limits and be considerate of others, alongside making practical improvements like these crossings, we hope to foster a culture of mutual respect and create a safer, more enjoyable experience for all visitors.”
Ahead of the work, CEPC engaged with local authorities, residents, community groups, members of the public and Transport for London. The work is due to be done by Spring 2026.
“This project forms part of the CEPC’s key strategic priority to improve pedestrian safety on the Outer Circle and aims to respond directly to concerns raised by CEPC ratepayers,” said Nick Packard, director of the Crown Estate Paving Commission.
“By investing in high-quality, well-designed infrastructure and subsequently monitoring its impact, we are supporting safer movement through the wider Regent’s Park estate.”






















20 thoughts on “Regent’s Park to get new pedestrian crossings as part of crackdown on ‘dangerous’ cyclists”
“They are advising cyclists
“They are advising cyclists to adhere to a code of conduct which includes advising cyclists to “control their speed”, “respect all park visitors” and refrain from riding in large groups.”
If we apply the same to drivers, then they are all screwed:
“They are advising drivers to adhere to a code of conduct (er, highway code?) which includes advising drivers to “control their speed”, “respect all park visitors” and refrain from driving in large groups.”
I mean – if it’s just advice
I mean – if it’s just advice and taken as such (like motor vehicle speed limits, or quite a bit of the highway code) then no problems surely? Everyone will get on with observing it when they fancy. As you were!
Crackdown on dangerous
Crackdown on dangerous cyclists?!? Based on official statements quoted in this short post, one may wonder why this blog tends to write tabloidish articles.
Trying to distract attention
Trying to distract attention away from the road users who do most of the killing and injuring: car drivers.
Indeed.
Indeed.
I emailed the Royal Parks via their website to ask if they have issued similar wording/advice to drivers (see my comment below) and what stats they are using to justify this on cyclists rather than drivers.
A Twitter user (I forget who,
A Twitter user (I forget who, I’ll see if I can find it) made a mock “Guidance for Drivers in The Royal Parks”. Royal Parks repsonse was to threaten legal action for using theire logo/font/name.
EDIT: It was @chaponabike
https://x.com/ChaponaBike123/status/1922058286179754024?s=20
Certainly wouldn’t want
Certainly wouldn’t want people using a park to do something as absurd as riding a bicycle. That’s what pavements are for!
sigirides wrote:
In what way is introducing new crossings for pedestrians preventing people from riding bicycles?
No one said it was preventing
No one said it was preventing people from riding bicycles. What you’ve done here is called a strawman fallacy. Great stuff.
sigirides wrote:
Please don’t be ridiculous, your comment “Certainly wouldn’t want people using a park to do something as absurd as riding a bicycle” clearly implied that the authorities were trying to stop people riding bicycles. A strawman is misrepresenting what somebody said, I’ve addressed exactly what you said.
Possibly a controversial
Possibly a controversial opinion but as somebody who occasionally enjoys a lap of Regent’s Park when I happen to be in the neighbourhood, I don’t have a problem with a few new signalised crossings being introduced. As the name implies, the Outer Circle runs all the way around the park and the only way for pedestrians to access the zoo, the open-air theatre and all the other delights therein is to cross it. It’s a wide road which frequently has high traffic volumes and the current island system simply doesn’t work; I’ve often seen older people, people with families et cetera stranded in the middle of the road with cars thundering by on both sides. Having signalised crossings at the entry points to the park to control both cyclists and motor vehicles is simply common sense.
The zoo has a signalised
The zoo has a signalised crossing. The open air theatre is on the inner circle, but has a signalised crossing at the closest access point on the outer circle.
sigirides wrote:
No it doesn’t, the nearest signalised crossing to the zoo is 300 m down the road.
Provision (it having become
Provision (it having become less safe because motorists) … but you have to walk several hundred metres.
That’s motornormativity, folks!
chrisonabike wrote:
It’s particularly choice in this instance because the parking for disabled visitors to the zoo is directly opposite the entrance, excellent, but if they want to cross the road safely they will have to walk/wheel 300m east, cross the road and come 300m back.
“But there’s a crossing …
“But there *is* a crossing, cost lots of money … there are thousands of people driving and only a few disabled visitors*, it doesn’t make sense to have a crossing that will get in everyone’s way. Besides it’s more dangerous to have people crossing right next to the car parks…”
If only there was some kind of way of having a totally safe direct link between the two sides of the road where the motorists (and even cyclists) wouldn’t even notice it was there? No, can’t think of any current infra that would do that…
https://www.londonzoo.org/zoo-stories/history-of-london-zoo/east-tunnel
(Of course that one was a bit narrow and dingy by “good” standards…)
* Likely because having been once and seen the provision they’ll give it a miss in future.
There was precious little
There was precious little enforcement when the dedicated Royal Parks Police were patrolling Regents Park, now that the local Safer Neighbourhoods Team is responsible I cannot imagine there being more enforcement (though they have run a trade vehicle op in Hyde Park this week).
Anti-social driving will remain the greatest danger in the park while the CEPC will point to the odd obnoxious cyclist ignoring the new red lights and claim that that is the ‘real problem’.
If you are local please try to attend one of the Met Engage events hosted in the evenings. I went to the 3rd December event on Great Portland Street. The equivalent of the old Borough Commander was present along with a few of the senior officers from nearby areas. In the Q&A people raised their concerns and these are expected to influence future deployment of resources. It opened at 6PM and there was an hour to speak to officers from dedicated teams such as the phone snatching team with their new Suron (?) electric bikes on display. These Engage events are rare chances to influence the local police, register and attend if you can.
Bill H wrote:
I agree, 100%, and hopefully some new signalised crossings will help to put the brake (pun intended) on that.
If the focus is on cyclists,
If the focus is on cyclists, then it’s not speeding they have a problem with, it’s cyclists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFMkYA7s58M
These three new signalised
These three new signalised crossings will get rid of three pinch points (caused by large pedestian islands) which is a positive.
Not sure it addresses the problems of too much motor traffic and speeding motor traffic, but it might take a big incident to get the CEPC to look at this properly.
Link for the plans: https://cepc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/250602-Engagement-Slides.pdf