Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Police investigate death threat against councillors over low traffic neighbourhoods and cycle lanes

Officers spoke to Hounslow man about social media post in which he said councillors backing active travel measures "need shooting"...

Police in west London have investigated a death threat made against councillors supporting low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) and cycle lanes in the borough of Hounslow, including Chiswick which has seen some of the most vocal opposition to interventions aimed at reducing traffic and promoting active travel. Officers have spoken to a local man about the threats, and consider the matter closed.

Local news website The Chiswick Calendar reports that the threat, made on community website Nextdoor.co.uk by a former unsuccessful candidate for a seat on Hounslow Council, was reported by both the council itself and by a local resident, who was told by police who visited that they took the incident very seriously.

The post was made by Simon Mabbutt, who had stood as a UKIP candidate in 2014 in Hounslow’s Chiswick Riverside ward, and who wrote: “The council members who agreed this most pathetic changes which has increased pollution, ruined businesses and KILLED PEOPLE RE EMERGENCY VEHICLES NEED SHOOTING. I AM HAPPY TO PULL THE TRIGGER. They are the biggest imbeciles ever.”

He added: “I think it’s time to find out who and where these imbeciles live.”

In response, one Marlene Johnson, who is director of a lettings agency in Chiswick and is also reportedly involved in the OneChiswick Facebook group which opposes emergency schemes designed to encourage active travel, is said to have pointed him towards the Hounslow Council website.

The council has subsequently removed references to councillors’ home addresses following advice from police.

Speaking to The Chiswick Calendar, council leader Steve Curran said: “Ever since the murder of Jo Cox MP, we take this sort of threat very seriously. The Chief Executive has passed it to the police.”

Speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, with her comments quoted on MyLondon, Councillor Katherine Dunne, cabinet member for communities, said: “Myself, Councillor Hanif Khan, Councillor Guy Lambert as well as the leader Steve Curran have all been coming under criticism because of the traffic changes, which is absolutely fine ... it is all part of democracy, but making threats is not fine.

“I doubt that person actually has a gun but it was very shocking certainly to see that and to see that is someone’s reaction rather than just wanting to raise it through proper channels.

“We’re not really scared people are going to do us some damage [but] it shakes you because you realise that they see you as a role, not as a person.”

She added that the chief cause of concern was not a post made by someone she described as a “keyboard warrior,” but rather that it might incite others to act upon it.

A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “On Wednesday, 4 November police were made aware of a threat made on social media involving a number of people.

“Officers contacted those involved and carried out enquires to establish who was responsible for posting the message.

“A 59-year-old man from Hounslow was spoken to by officers and subsequently apologised to the victims. No further action will be taken.”

Hounslow is controlled by Labour, but the eastern wards of the borough, north of the Thames in and around Chiswick, are represented by Conservative councillors who long opposed plans for Cycleway 9, now being installed on the High Road, initially with wands for segregation.

In recent months, as the council has undertaken emergency active travel interventions such as banning through traffic from streets including Turnham Green Terrace and Devonshire Road (ignored, it has to be said, by many motorists), rhetoric used by Tory councillors against such measures has become increasingly strident.

Former leader of the Conservative group on the council, Joanna Biddolph, who is still a councillor, accused it of turning Chiswick into “Belfast during the troubles” and maintained that LTNs had created a “ghetto,” while the current Tory leader in Hounslow, Councillor Gerald McGregor, likened them to the “Berlin Wall.”  

Last week, the council leader survived a vote of no confidence brought by Councillor McGregor – unsurprisingly, given Labours 40-seat majority in Hounslow – and afterwards, Councillor Curran said: “I understand the frustration that the introduction of the Low Traffic Neighbourhood schemes and Cycleway 9 has caused some residents in Chiswick.

“The LTNs were introduced at the direct request of this Government to improve walking and cycling to avoid a car-led recovery and to improve air quality particularly for those most at risk, the young and the elderly.

“These measures are temporary and will be independently reviewed before a final decision is made as to whether they become permanent. If they are not doing what they set out to do, then they will cease or be changed. This was always the intention. As it says on the tin, these were introduced under Temporary Management Orders.

Regarding the vote of no confidence, he added: “This whole farce has been a distraction caused by the Tory Councillors playing politics at a time when they should have been concentrating on working with us to beat the pandemic. Our residents and businesses expect nothing less. This was shameful grandstanding on their behalf.”

It's not the first time that death threats have been issued against elected officials in London by people opposed to LTNs.

In September, we reported how Hackney councillor Jon Burke had received a handwritten note threatening him and his family, leading local MP Diane Abbott to say: “Threatening to kill a councillor because you can’t drive your car exactly where you want, when you want. Appalling”

> Hackney councillor sent death threats over support for low traffic neighbourhoods

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Jenova20 | 3 years ago
1 like

"The council has subsequently removed references to councillors’ home addresses following advice from police."

I really have to wonder why they ever thought it appropriate or safe to give out the personal addresses of councillors in the first place. There's a time and a place for politics. The doorstep of a politician is never the right place.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Jenova20 wrote:

"The council has subsequently removed references to councillors’ home addresses following advice from police."

I really have to wonder why they ever thought it appropriate or safe to give out the personal addresses of councillors in the first place. There's a time and a place for politics. The doorstep of a politician is never the right place.

They are your representatives; you have to be able to contact them to express your views, that is your democratic right.  Addresses are appropriate for people who don't use other methods of communication, and the fact that these addresses have been removed say a lot about the state of our laughingly called democracy, where the party that gets 44% of the vote gets an 80 seat majority.

Avatar
David9694 replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like

This is a long-standing tradition in local authority land, being really clear who representatives are - and its ending in recent years is a real indictment on our society (Not so) phoney rage, entitlement lack of any respect etc.

 

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

Jenova20 wrote:

"The council has subsequently removed references to councillors’ home addresses following advice from police."

I really have to wonder why they ever thought it appropriate or safe to give out the personal addresses of councillors in the first place. There's a time and a place for politics. The doorstep of a politician is never the right place.

They are your representatives; you have to be able to contact them to express your views, that is your democratic right.  Addresses are appropriate for people who don't use other methods of communication.

The address of the council works just as well.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Jenova20 wrote:

The address of the council works just as well.

Yes - because when you write to the council offices it's much more convenient for them to put your letter in the bin!

Avatar
mpdouglas | 3 years ago
6 likes

Phoney outrage.  If they really cared about access to hospitals being impacted, they might be better served looking into the 30,000-40,000 annual hospitalisations caused by road traffic collisions and the extent to which that affects people being treated in hospital! But that doesn't suit their small-minded, hate-based narrative.

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 3 years ago
3 likes

And a similar vote of no confidence was done in BCP and won on its 2nd attempt  by Conservatives, off the back of much noise about LTNs created in the local toilet newspaper. A conspiracy theorist might suggest the Tories intentionally created the Emergency Active Travel plan and then stir up the hatred in the local rags so they can get Tories to stage a coup against councils they didn't win in the last election. 

Avatar
David9694 replied to Muddy Ford | 3 years ago
1 like

As always with conspiracy, the alleged Bad Thing always seems like an awful lot of trouble to go to, lots of collateral damage and carries very little certainty of achieving the desired aim!

Avatar
Captain Badger | 3 years ago
4 likes

UKIPs finest in action again....

Avatar
Eton Rifle replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
0 likes
Captain Badger wrote:

UKIPs finest in action again....

Sounds like the usual Gammon twat.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
4 likes

Tell me again that drivers aren't addicts?

Latest Comments