Ineos Grenadiers have admitted to the use of carbon monoxide rebreathers, the controversial method now banned for non-diagnostic purposes by WADA and used by other teams, such as Visma-Lease a Bike and UAE Team Emirates, purportedly as a means of testing and optimising riders’ altitude training.
While Ineos denied that they had used the dangerous rebreathers – which have also been linked to performance enhancement – for testing purposes at the 2024 Tour de France, the British squad have since confirmed that they were later utilised in early 2025 as a “measurement method” at a training camp.
An itinerary seen by The Times shows the tests were carried out days before WADA introduced measures to restrict their use, while Ineos have stressed that carbon monoxide was never used to “enhance performance” and that the British squad “always adhered to UCI rules and regulations on this issue”.
According to the document viewed by The Times, CO rebreather tests were conducted in Room 101 of the Syncrosfera Fitness and Health Hotel in eastern Spain during an Ineos training camp earlier this year.
The itinerary reveals that seven cyclists had taken the test over two days, some of whom were teenagers. They were asked to sit on a bed and inhale a mixture of oxygen and carbon monoxide for five to six minutes. They had a break of around 15 to 20 minutes before doing it again.
Several experts have said that it would not be unusual to conduct two tests, a few minutes apart, as they can get a more reliable, average measurement.
The second day of the use of carbon monoxide rebreathers was February 1, the same day that WADA announced that its use would be banned.
The new rules stated that from February 10, only “one CO inhalation to measure total Hb mass will be permitted. A second CO inhalation will only be authorised two weeks after the initial Hb measurement.”
The riders had to sign consent forms before undergoing the tests, which were overseen by a professor at the Inland University in Lillehammer, Norway, who is now working exclusively for Q36.5.
Two sources said some of the riders called were not involved in altitude training at the time. They said at least one felt nauseous and struggled to breathe by the end of the back-to-back tests.
The controversy surrounding carbon monoxide rebreathers followed a report by the Escape Collective website, which stated that UAE Team Emirates, Visma-Lease a Bike, and Israel-Premier Tech allegedly used carbon monoxide during the 2024 Tour de France.
Ineos Grenadiers denied the use of the test. However, after being confronted by The Times with knowledge of the testing in Spain, Ineos confirmed its use of carbon monoxide following the 2024 season.
Ineos told road.cc: “This is a measurement method developed during the 1980s and used widely ever since. As publicly known, teams in the peloton and across other sports have been measuring HbMass through this method for several years.
“The INEOS Grenadiers did not use this method in the 2024 racing season or seasons before that – for the avoidance of doubt, that includes the 2024 Tour de France.
“The team has since used this as a diagnostic tool – this has only ever been used as a measurement method to check how individual riders respond to altitude (this can be simulated or natural altitude) as well as heat stress and training.
“We have never used it to enhance performance and have always adhered to UCI rules and regulations on this issue.”

When questioned following the controversial report, UAE Team Emirates, Visma-Lease a Bike and Premier Tech confirmed that they had access to the equipment for testing, but any alternative use has not been proven.
“It’s to measure how much haemoglobin you have in your blood. There is nothing suspicious about it,” said Jonas Vingegaard.
“They [the doctors] say that they send something into the lungs that is similar to smoking a cigarette. We measure the day we get to our high-altitude camp and then on the day we go back down. Then we see the difference in how much haemoglobin is built up. There is nothing more to it.”
Tadej Pogačar also said: “It’s a test in altitude camp to see how you respond to altitude. You need to do this test, it’s like a two or three-minute-long test. You breathe into a balloon for one minute, and then you see the haemoglobin mass, and then you need to repeat it two weeks after.
“But I did just the first part of the test. I never did the second part because the girl who was supposed to come after two weeks didn’t come. It’s not like we’re breathing exhaust pipes every day in the cars. It’s just a pretty simple test to see how you respond to altitude training
A UAE Team Emirates spokesperson added, “It is a well-established, safe, professional method that is backed by a very large amount of research. It is used widely by athletes, climbers and other persons who are exposed to altitude for professional sports or other physical activities.”
“It’s not a therapy; it’s a diagnostic tool that we use to essentially work out what our athletes’ physiology is,” the team’s medical director Adriano Rotunno told Escape Collective.
Israel Premier Tech also said, “sole use of the Detalo Blood Volume Analyzer is for testing purposes to measure the impact of altitude training”.

However, retired French rider Romain Bardet did suggest that it could explain the jump in form from some riders.
“We see the studies. Anything is possible. I have never heard of anything, but at the same time, I would not be surprised,” said former DSM-Firmenich PostNL climber Bardet.
“It is not surprising that there are certain researchers, certain teams, certain cyclists who are looking elsewhere. There will always be the desire to seek competitive advantages.
“Carbon monoxide could explain the trajectory of some people we didn’t know about a year, a year and a half ago, but it’s also a bit of an easy claim to make without looking at their trajectory.
The non-diagnostic use of the gas is now banned, as it can increase erythropoiesis under certain conditions,” according to the WADA.
Erythropoiesis, or the production of oxygen-carrying red blood cells, can be stimulated by the inhalation of carbon monoxide. However, in sufficient doses, the inhalation of this gas can be fatal, raising safety fears about riders potentially risking their health for performance gains.
This stimulates the type of hypoxia, or lack of oxygen, that would occur at high altitude levels. Training camps in high altitude have become standard for professional cyclists, as hypoxic exercise improves the body’s ability to use oxygen during exercise.
The gas can still be used as a diagnostic tool. For example, it could be used during altitude camp to track a rider’s progress over a block of training, as it provides an accurate means of measuring haemoglobin.
























18 thoughts on “Ineos Grenadiers admit to using now-banned carbon monoxide rebreathing test – but team insist they did nothing wrong”
CO rebreathing to determine
CO rebreathing to determine absolute haemoglobin mass is a very very long-standing and common measurement used in sports physiology for many decades. Pretty much every WT rider will have done this test at least once, and probably many times.
Bit of a weird moral panic over nothing.
My suspicion is that someone
My suspicion is that someone somewhere came to the conclusion that (a) there is a potential danger associated with the test and that (b) the only justification for taking on the risk is that it must enhance performance.
Your intro is a total dog’s
Your intro is a total dog’s dinner and sugegsts Visma and UAE still do it. While the headline is clickbait – they insist they did nothing wrong because they did nothing wrong.
All in all something of a non story.
It does confirm though that
It does confirm though that unless confronted with undeniable evidence Ineos just lie through their teeth. It’s difficult to believe anything they have said in the past or will say in the future.
I don’t think it does confirm
I don’t think it does confirm that though, does it? A year ago, when Escape Collective broke the original story, Ineos said they hadn’t used it (so including the 2024 Tour as discussed here), and now confirm that they have used it in 2025, so since being asked about it at that point. Or am I misreading it?
I don’t think it does confirm
I don’t think it does confirm that though, does it? A year ago, when Escape Collective broke the original story, Ineos said they hadn’t used it (so including the 2024 Tour as discussed here), and now confirm that they have used it in 2025, so since being asked about it at that point. Or am I misreading it?
I don’t think it does confirm
I don’t think it does confirm that though, does it? A year ago, when Escape Collective broke the original story, Ineos said they hadn’t used it (so including the 2024 Tour as discussed here), and now confirm that they have used it in 2025, so since being asked about it at that point. Or am I misreading it?
Yep – the reporting is trying
Yep – the reporting is trying very hard to insinuate that they’ve been caught in a lie, or forced to own up to something they were trying to cover up, but the available facts don’t actually appear to justify any of that.
Exactly that. It’s a non
Exactly that. It’s a non story with a journalist desperately trying to make it into one with a clickbait headline. Road CC should know and do better.
Although the use of this test
Although the use of this test has been used to measure hemoglobin mass it seems as if it has been used to enhance performance and as such is now banned.Perhaps because it’s considered dangerous.Maybe I’ve misunderstood,please feel free to correct me.
I can’t help but put professional cycling teams in the same category as politicians.
As far as I understand it,
As far as I understand it, there have been no documented cases, or even specific allegations, of it being used for performance-enhancing purposes – just a bit of vague rumbling about ‘well they must be doing something to go that fast’, and a bunch of teams saying they have used it as a diagnostic tool.
It’s not dangerous. Unless
It’s not dangerous. Unless there’s some idiot out there who reads these stories and thinks “Ooh, if I get cosy with my car’s exhaust while running it in my garage I’ll win my local Strava KOM!” and Darwin Awards themselves.
Anyone near a team, or with an ability to use google, will have some kind of device with a small canister that either holds or makes the required CO in a small, completely non-dangerous dose (in a lab, possibly taken from a big gas bottle into a bladder).
I don’t know of a study showing a performance benefit, but the idea is it generates the same effect as an altitude camp: Mild, chronic hypoxia. And there is some evidence for performance benefits of that in the context of altitude camps.
One difference: You need to leave at least a week, and maybe a bit more, between CO rebreathing and any kind of race. Whereas you can go directly from an altitude camp to a race.
Another difference: Altitude camps are a lot, a lot more expensive.
Exactly right Paul, the
Exactly right Paul, the language used in this article is loose and inaccurate.
The headline seems to indicate that the inhalation of CO for diagnostic measurement of Hb mass is banned – it isn’t. Neither is the test dangerous (I blame Escape Collective for repeating this inaccuracy). The test involves inhaling a controlled bolus of CO – it is not a long term infusion which is most readily associated with CO toxicity.
Ionizing radiation used in X-rays imaging is harmful, but the usage as a diagnostic tool outweighs the risks as long as it is used appropriately. CO inhalation for the accurate measurement of changes in Hb mass is no different.
Just on this:
Just on this:
“This is a measurement method developed during the 1980s”
It’s _way_ older. IIRC this measurement method was developed in the 1920s, but my memory being what it is, it might have been earlier. It’s been in use for at least a century!
I’m impressed that you can
I’m impressed that you can remember the 1920s, never mind earlier.
It’s the power of CO…
It’s the power of CO…
Imagine there are documents
Imagine there are documents describing the history of this technique, and people are capable of reading such and remembering them.
And specifically, it’s the result of work by James Lorrain Smith and John Scott Haldane, in the very early 1900s. Here is the article, dated 29th August 1900:
https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.1900.sp000800
Actually, and pedantically (I
Actually, and pedantically (I happened to look it up yesterday after seeing this exchange), it dates back even further, being proposed by French scientists Grehant and Quinquaud in 1882; Smith and Haldane developed the first practical apparatus to perform the test but they didn’t invent the theory.