Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Irish Prime Minister slams €336,000 bike shed at Parliament with 18 cycle stands — where your bike may still get wet in the rain — as "inexcusable and inexplicable", as government orders review into "astronomical costs"

The bike shed at Leinster House was built last year and has caused a furore in the Oireachtas, with ministers from all parties, including Minister of Transport Eamon Ryan questioning how were the costs justified

A bike shed which cost €336,000 (£283,149) to build at the Irish Parliament and has 18 individual Sheffield-style cycle stands, but still bearing the possibility of the bikes getting wet in the rain, has found itself in the middle of a major controversy as questions have been raised as to how were the "astronomical costs" justified, with the Taoiseach (Irish prime minister) Simon Harris describing it as "inexcusable and inexplicable".

The bike shed was built last year on the grounds of Leinster House, the seat of the Oireachtas, the Irish Parliament in Dublin, with a statement from the Office of Public Works (OPW) confirming the amount spent to build the shelter, the breakdown presented as €322,282 (£271,755) was spent on the main construction and installation, €2,952 (£2,489) on archaeological services, and a further €10,816 (£9,120) was paid for contract administration services in The Irish Times.

It's now reported that an "immediate review" into the costs associated with the construction of the bike shed has been requested by Kieran O’Donnell, Teachta Dála with responsibility for the OPW, which claimed that the project "was procured via a framework agreement and complies with public procurement and planning guidelines".

At a pre-Cabinet briefing on Tuesday morning, Taoiseach Simon Harris welcomed the review, saying the costs are "inexcusable and inexplicable", adding while public can see the benefits of bike spaces at workplaces, they do not understand the "extraordinary" costs reported.

"This is the sort of thing that rightly angers and annoys people,” he said, adding that while workplaces should provide spaces for parking bikes, they should not be "lavish" or "extortionate".

Transport Minister Eamon Ryan, who has been an advocate of active travel in Ireland, said that the OPW had questions to answer and that he was "shocked" when he saw the price, adding that it was "very important and good that we have bicycle sheds", but said it "seem an incredibly expensive cost".

He said: "I think this [the bike shed] could be a useful lesson to say ... how can we deliver good architecture, good street furniture, good kind of support the people want, but not make it so expensive."

Green Party TD Neasa Hourigan, who is an architect, said the cost of the bike shelter should have been half of the amount revealed on Monday. "It is hard to see how it can be justifiable," she told RTÉ radio’s Today with Claire Byrne show.

"It is the cost of constructing a house. It’s not even a shed, it’s an L-shaped canopy. So your bike’s possibly still going to get wet. I think that there are answers that we require. I’m not so keen on what the Minister said this morning that the OPW itself will review that.

"I don’t necessarily see that we need the OPW to put it on the long finger and look at its own work and inquire into itself. We just need the documents to be released."

> Irish family told to remove "visual clutter" bespoke bike shed may now just park a trailer on driveway for storing bikes instead, after planning board claims "disorderly" timber-clad structure "would set an undesirable precedent"

Meanwhile, a statement from the OPW said it recognised “the importance of ensuring that public money is spent transparently”.

The construction of the bike shelter involved “several unique challenges”, the OPW said, due to it being located within the setting of Leinster House, “a protected structure of national importance”.

“The structure consists of a steel framed, glazed canopy to ensure long term durability. The materials used, including Irish granite, glass and steel were carefully selected not only for their durability, but also for their compatibility with the historic setting of our national parliament,” the statement said.

Ms Hourigan acknowledged the OPW’s point that it was a "very sensitive site", but claimed that she wasn't sure if it was a "€300,000 sensitive site", adding that it was "effectively a very, very simple structure".

The Irish Times reports that the Oireachtas had no role in approving funding for a €350,000 bike shed in Leinster House. Ceann Comhairle (speaker of the Irish Parliement) Seán Ó Fearghaíl said that while the bike shelter was initially sought by the Houses of Oireachtas Commission on foot of requests made by members of the Oireachtas, it had no role in approving the spending on the project.

He said hat in the future the Commission, which provides for the running of the Oireachtas, will seek details of costings associated with improvements or works undertaken on the wider Leinster House complex, adding that he was “astonished” by the figure.

Meanwhile, at the Cabinet meeting, Minister for Justice Helen McEntee described the cost as “astronomical” and a “phenomenal amount”. 

Social Democrats TD Catherine Murphy asked the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to trawl for documents on the process leading up to the construction of the bike shed.

She said that she has written to Committee chair Brian Stanley asking that PAC write to the Office of Public Works and the leadership of the Houses of the Oireachtas, as well as its accounting officer, regarding the installation of the shed.

Labour finance spokesman Ged Nash told reporters on Tuesday that the spending on the bike shelter was “absolutely indefensible”. He said “much more responsibility” had to be shown by State agencies managing public projects.

> Cyclist threatened with €13 million fine and two years in prison over bike shed, forcing her to give up cycling

This isn't the first time a bike shed has grabbed headlines in Ireland. Earlier this year, a Cork family's plans of storing their bikes were thrown into jeopardy after they lost their appeal to have a bike shed in front of their house, with the council claiming that the bespoke storage unit "would conflict with the existing pattern of development in the area" and constitutes "visual clutter" that "would set an undesirable precedent".

In a series of planning documents and appeals on An Bord Pleanála's website, it is revealed that Denis O'Regan and his family were denied retention permission for a 5.3sq m timber-clad structure that would be used to store bicycles and bins on the driveway of their home in Ballintemple, Cork.

Mr O'Regan believed the decision was in contrary to rulings in similar cases and argued the "bespoke" structure was in line with planning requirements and would promote sustainable active travel by providing his family a secure and accessible place to store several bicycles, including an electric cargo bike.

"Storing bikes in an easy-to-reach secure location helps to encourage adults and children to cycle more often," he said, pointing out the design was made to fit in with the recent extension to the property and was actually installed to reduce what the council called "visual clutter", allowing them a storage unit to keep bins and bikes without impacting off-street parking.

The family later said that they were considering simply parking a trailer on the driveway to securely store bikes in and avoid the planning headache. 

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

23 comments

Avatar
ktache | 1 week ago
2 likes

I think it's rather nice, it's protected by bollards, there's a little alfresco overspill area and Sheffield stands are a tried and tested locking up to thing.

Oh, and it's 36 bikes that can be locked to it.

I might have had the glass roof come further out to compensate for the high roof, needed to get the steel beams well above head height. But it's sited in a fairly sheltered area.

That doesn't look like cheap glass to me. I have never used anything quite that luxurious.

Avatar
Huw Watkins | 1 week ago
4 likes

From Independence Day (1996):

President Whitmore: I don't understand, where does all this come from? How do you get funding for something like this?

Julius: You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?

 

 

Avatar
Paul J | 1 week ago
1 like

Someone somewhere, connected to either a politician or a highish civil servant, walked away with ~200k of "profit" on this job.

Typical Irish corruption.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Paul J | 1 week ago
4 likes
Paul J wrote:

Someone somewhere, connected to either a politician or a highish civil servant, walked away with ~200k of "profit" on this job. Typical Irish corruption.

FTFY.

Avatar
Gbjbanjs replied to Paul J | 1 week ago
0 likes

I find the use of the word "Irish" objectionable, especially with the words typical and corruption. I think you'll find that Ireland has quite a high ranking by International standards .
Ireland does have an issue with
infrastructure projects in general
whether major roads, Children's
Hospitals or in this case a bike shelter. This is due to completed out dated planning processess and serial/professionally organised objectors/nimbys clogging up the planning process.

Avatar
Paul J replied to Gbjbanjs | 1 week ago
1 like
Gbjbanjs wrote:

I find the use of the word "Irish" objectionable, especially with the words typical and corruption. I think you'll find that Ireland has quite a high ranking by International standards .

I have no idea how we rank internationally, but soft corruption is *rife* in Ireland when it comes to planning and council or state contracts. Come on... we had a bunch of tribunals in the 90s - 00s over this, the Moriarty Tribunal particularly. With brown envelopes galore to ministers and councillors, a former Taoiseach who lived on a mansion on his own personal island which was way beyond what his salary should have afforded him, another Taoiseach who had no bank account and claimed to rely on "dig outs" from "friends" (a.k.a developers) to explain all the cash swilling around, etc. Even recently, we had massive contracts for rubbish PPE go to the businesses of well connected families (similar things happened in other countries). It's about who you know, and greasing the palms of the right people, all with the coin you and I had to work hard for.

336k for a basic bike shelter - the material for which can be bought for 10 to 20k - *after* the 10 to 15k for planning and archeological assessment... It is *obvious* what is going on - someone has walked off with 200k+ of public money (some of which no doubt is circling back into the coffers of 1 or more political parties, politicians, and/or civil servants).

If we're somehow "good" internationally, then it's just that we're good at keeping it under cover; or else that everyone else is corrupt too. And you're being very naive too.

The same thing is surely happening in nearly every *other* public contract too. Just those are too complicated for the corruption to be so starkly obvious. This bikeshed anyone can see and understand what is going on. It is emblematic of how the public is *being fleeced* by politicians, civil servants and connected cronies.

Avatar
ubercurmudgeon | 1 week ago
1 like

Literal bikeshedding.

Avatar
IanMK | 1 week ago
3 likes

From the video it looks like they took the opportunity to resurface the tarmac at the same time. It's funny that they had to use Irish Granite to surface the cycle rack but they seem perfectly happy with tarmac to surface the parking space at the far end.
It's still a lot of money.

Avatar
EK Spinner | 1 week ago
5 likes

The problem with these isn't the real costs, it the managment of costs / budgets. Staff at various companies will have a time timesheet to fill in at the end of each week, and will need to log thier contracted hours (35 - 40 or whatever). Come friday afternoon as they fill it out and various budget holders complain about how much of thier budget has been eaten up then the hours will be reallocated to the job which has the least managment resistance and this is often the job that is coming out of the public purse.

Avatar
EK Spinner replied to EK Spinner | 1 week ago
5 likes

that and the cost of designing the job 3 or 4 times over because the client doesn't really know what they want until presented with something that they don't want

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 week ago
4 likes

Whilst the cost does not appear justified, it seems to be being used as a political football to attack the ruling parties, especially the Greens.  I wonder if the same people get quite so het up about spending £100m on a road junction?

Avatar
JMcL_Ireland replied to eburtthebike | 1 week ago
1 like

Especially Eamonn Ryan the (Green) Minister for Transport, who had no oversight and responsibility for this whatsoever. Not that that's stopping the usual right wing knuckle draggers blaming him.

Avatar
Aluminium can | 1 week ago
3 likes

It's clearly a significant heritage building so the architects have designed a structure that matches the curved glass roof you can see in the background. Pretty much any other design (especially an actual shed) you could think of would have been more intrusive and had outraged citizens calling for it to be demolished. The fact that no one is saying it should be removed makes it a success. I did a really really cheap 2 storey car park 15 years ago. Target price was AUD $25,000 per car bay. NOT including land. Price would be impossible now, obviously. So I think bikes will always be cheaper to park even if you provide gold plated U-rails to lock to.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Aluminium can | 1 week ago
2 likes
Aluminium can wrote:

the architects have designed a structure that matches the curved glass roof you can see in the background

Where are you seeing that? It looks like a pretty straight and straightforward bus shelter design to me.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Aluminium can | 1 week ago
4 likes
Aluminium can wrote:

So I think bikes will always be cheaper to park even if you provide gold plated U-rails to lock to.

They'd be very resistant to corrosion, but TBH I think they'd attract thieves… 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 1 week ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:
Aluminium can wrote:

So I think bikes will always be cheaper to park even if you provide gold plated U-rails to lock to.

They'd be very resistant to corrosion, but TBH I think they'd attract thieves…

Add a bit of duct tape, plaster on the stickers and flyers, bend it a bit / lean it at an angle, attach several crappy old locks / rusty chains and a mangy-looking mongrel - no one will notice it.

Avatar
bikes replied to Aluminium can | 1 week ago
2 likes

It looks like a standard design to me. One you might see outside of any modern airport. I'm not saying it looks bad, but it's the kind of thing that an architect specs all day long without thinking about it.

Avatar
belugabob | 1 week ago
1 like

I can't help but wonder how much it would cost to install 18 (much less space efficient) car parking spaces

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to belugabob | 1 week ago
7 likes

Thats not really the point is it. The issue isn't building a bike shed, its that someone has likely made an absolute fortune sticking up something that should cost a fraction of what it did. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to mctrials23 | 1 week ago
3 likes

Indeed. This is not a "cycling" thing, it's a public procurement thing. And yet in the media we read phrases like "...Eamon Ryan – himself a cyclist – who said ...".

As well as the eye-watering cost, there's the useless design to consider too. The shelter itself is not in fact going to shelter your bike - it'll still get wet when it rains. Nor does the shelter enhance the security. The cost was supposedly due to all the sympathetic design and materials - it would have been even more sympathetic, and no less useless, to not build the "shelter" at all. Perhaps, if they had built it facing the wall, it would have actually offered the shelter its name suggests.

Avatar
Paul J replied to Sriracha | 1 week ago
1 like

It seems a pretty basic and standard shelter design, and indeed not massively useful against the weather. On security, it's behind the very large gates of Leinster House, which always have Gardai on them. Reasonably well protected from the more light-fingered elements living in town - so security isn't a great issue.

Avatar
JMcL_Ireland replied to belugabob | 1 week ago
0 likes
belugabob wrote:

I can't help but wonder how much it would cost to install 18 (much less space efficient) car parking spaces

One plausible suggestion I've heard is that it's just that, except it's reported as "building a bike shed" rather than "tarmacing a car park" which is probably swept up as "ancilliary works" but doesn't get the ShTwitterati as hot under the collar.

It's ludicrous and inexcusable (it's not even a great bike shed), but I'd love to see where the costs actually went

Avatar
Sriracha replied to belugabob | 1 week ago
1 like
belugabob wrote:

I can't help but wonder how much it would cost to install 18 (much less space efficient) car parking spaces

To answer that, I read something about Eynsham park and ride car park outside Oxford. It cost £51M for 850 spaces, or £60k per space, which would equate to £2.16M for 36 spaces.
https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/residents/roads-and-transport/roadworks/f...

Latest Comments