The family of a Dublin cyclist killed in a horrifying collision with a HGV driver, after which it took ten days to formally identify his body, have called for urgent action to improve the city’s cycling infrastructure and reduce the dangers posed by lorries to vulnerable road users.
Derek Doyle was cycling home from his job as an usher at the Irish parliament in Leinster House, just days before Christmas last year, when he was fatally struck by a left-turning lorry driver in Castleknock, five miles west of Dublin city centre.
An investigation into the circumstances surrounding the cyclist’s death is currently ongoing. However, speaking to RTE this week, Derek’s wife Tania and daughter Hazel-Lynn say they know he was killed when he was hit by a HGV driver turning left onto the narrow College Road in the village of Castleknock, ending up under the lorry’s wheels.
“Derek was cycling through the junction and was hit by a lorry. And he was run over on his bicycle and found under the left-hand wheel of the lorry,” Tania, an independent councillor on Fingal County Council, said.
Derek’s body was so severely damaged in the collision that it took ten days for him to be formally identified, a wait his family described as “traumatic”. He was finally identified after Hazel-Lynn provided a lock of hair and a saliva sample, enabling DNA match to be made.
“That’s something that will never leave me,” she said. “To have to give a piece of yourself to identify your dad is something nobody should ever have to do.”
“We had to have a closed coffin. So, we never got to say goodbye,” Tania added.
And now, eight months on from Derek’s death, Tania and Hazel-Lynn are calling on the authorities in Ireland to create cycling infrastructure that is “fit for purpose”, while also urging the government to introduce measures designed to eliminate blind spots for HGV drivers.
In particular, Tania and Hazel-Lynn believe that the junction in Castleknock where Derek was killed should be urgently addressed.

While most of Derek’s commute home through the city centre and Pheonix Park is served by recently introduced protected cycle lanes, the city’s safe cycling network ends in Castleknock village. There, an unprotected, painted bike lane leads to the junction where he was killed, a tight left-hand turn onto College Road.
Tania believes that the route is unsuitable for HGV drivers, who frequently struggle to navigate the turn, and that measures should be taken to make the junction safer for cyclists.
When RTE’s Prime Time monitored the junction on 29 August, they witnessed one lorry driver struggling to make it around the corner, mounting the footpath in the process.
The junction’s advanced stop box for cyclists at the traffic lights, Tania says, is also frequently encroached by motorists. This assertion was backed up by Prime Time’s spell on the street, the programme finding that they witnessed the “majority of traffic” stopping in the bike box (an assessment tellingly supported by Google’s Street View function).

However, in the aftermath of Derek’s death, Fingal County Council carried out a standard collision report, concluding that the junction is “safe for all road users”.
The local authority, of which Tania is a member, also says it has no plans to make changes to the junction or to restrict HGV drivers from turning left onto College Road.
However, Hazel-Lynn believes that the village’s infrastructure shortcomings are responsible for her father’s death and need to be addressed.
“They want you to be fit for the economy and use cycle to work scheme, [but] roads have to be safe. If the roads aren’t fit for purpose and the infrastructure isn’t fit for purpose, look what’s happening,” she said.
A former member of the Irish Army, Derek served in Lebanon before joining the Irish Air Corps. As a military man, Hazel-Lynn says her father “did everything by the book” while cycling. According to Hazel-Lynn, he was “lit up like a Christmas tree” on his bike and stopped for every red light.
However, despite “doing everything right”, Hazel-Lynn argued that the lack of safe cycling infrastructure ultimately cost him his life.
Meanwhile, though the exact circumstances of his death are yet to be established, the family are also calling for safety measures eliminating blind spots for lorry drivers to be implemented.
In 2021, Transport for London introduced its Direct Vision Standard (DVS) lorry safety scheme, effectively removing the most dangerous lorries, and those with the least vision, from the roads and encouraging operators to adhere to the highest levels of safety.
While there are currently no plans to introduce similar regulations in Ireland, European Union rules will prohibit the sale of new HGVs with blind spots from 2029.
However, Tania insists that far more needs to be done, and soon.
“Trucks on the road need to be safe. If there are blind spots, in particular on the left-hand side, your truck is not safe,” she said.
“And if all it takes is to put extra sensors on the side of the truck, and particularly on the front of the truck as well, that’s not a big deal.”
Tania said that their family has been “in a black hole” since Derek was killed, as they attempt to “deal with the trauma and then the grief”, while Hazel-Lynn is adamant that no other family should have to go through what they’ve experienced over the past eight months.
“We’re reliving what’s happened every day,” she said. “I feel like I’m hamster on a hamster wheel, and I’m running around. But there’s no end. It’s not life without Dad. It’s not.”
By calling for safer roads and HGV measures, the Doyle family joins the parents of Emma Burke Newman, a cyclist killed after being hit and dragged for over 50 metres by a lorry driver in Glasgow, in highlighting the dual dangers of large vehicles and poor infrastructure for cyclists.
In March last year, 69-year-old HGV driver Paul Mowat was sentenced to 100 hours of unpaid community work under police supervision and banned from driving for 12 months after admitting to driving without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road, following the collision that killed cyclist Emma, a 22-year-old American-French student studying architecture at Glasgow School of Art, in January 2023.

Footage played at Glasgow Sheriff Court showed lorry driver Mowat, along with another bus driver, encroach beyond an Advanced Stop Line (ASL) at a set of traffic lights at the junction of Broomielaw and Oswald Street on Glasgow’s King George V Bridge.
Emma can then be seen moving into the first lane, passing Mowat’s lorry, the windscreen and mirrors of which were dirty at the time, on the nearside.
However, as they both set off, Mowat turned left, hitting the cyclist’s pannier rack, causing her to fall and dragging her under the lorry for 53 metres. The 22-year-old was rushed to hospital, where she died the following morning from her injuries.
Following Mowat’s sentencing, Emma’s parents, Rose Marie Burke and John Newman, said the junction where her daughter was killed was an “accident waiting to happen”, and that they were working with Glasgow City Council to install safer infrastructure in the area.
They also encouraged more people to ride bikes as part of a “virtuous cycle” to make the roads safer, amid a broader call for safer infrastructure and more awareness of vulnerable road users by motorists.





















17 thoughts on ““They want you to cycle, but roads have to be safe”: Cyclist killed by lorry driver in crash so horrifying it took ten days to identify his body – but council says junction is “safe for all road users””
Anyone who claims that a
Anyone who claims that a section of road/junction is safe where a KSI (or maybe even no injury collision) occurs should be made to repeatedly cycle that stretch during the entire morning and evening rush hour for a day.
Unfortunately our systems
Unfortunately our systems lean far more towards the courts to “fix things” on crash at a time * and too little towards the more holistic “safe system” approach (AKA ” ‘elf and safety applied to the roads”, “sustainable safety” etc.)
We need both … but we need a lot more “fix it *before* someone dies” and “don’t treat incidents in isolation – analyse them in the context of others and use that feedback to adjust practice”.
* At best courts can provide “remedy” after the fact, with some hope of deterrence and a tiny bit of “take the problem off the roads for a bit”. And in theory “… and by the time they get out they may have changed their ways, or at least be a little less reckless”.
As we know that is the ideal… and the system is very far from that for many reasons.
mitsky wrote:
Why wait? The “mine clearance reassurance” principle should be followed for any new / updated infra. (That’s where the deminers join arms and walk across the terrain declared free from explosives).
The planners, contractors, council officers and relevant councillors (and their offspring!) should be issued with three-speed bikes and panniers full of shopping / child seats, double buggies, wheelchairs etc and test it first. But not with no traffic and a brass band – they should release the buses, trucks, delivery vans (and motorbikes) first…
My council person rides a
My council person rides a bike.
Once a year
As a community outreach event to support bicycling
With 100 +/- participants
Pre marked out route
With security and police escort
See how safe and accomodating bicycling is!
Those making such a statement
Those making such a statement have demonstrated breathtaking incompetence and should be summarily dismissed. Their certifications should also be removed by the relevant professional bodies for bringing them into disrepute.
I’ve been cycling for donkeys
I’ve been cycling for donkeys years but within the last 6 years I’ve had two bad accidents. First one car pulled out and over the bonnet I went broken hand and terrible bruising and road rash.now the last one I had a bad accident 28Aug 2025 cycling along minding my own business, nothing in front of me, next thing I know, I’m laid on the road, with multiple injuries (no breaks luckily) ambulance and police. I never knew what hit me! Got knocked unconscious! Helmet on the front wrecked. It was a van, which totally wiped me out. I’m battered but lucky to be alive. The wife has banned me from riding ever again. Both wheels, left hand crank and pedal bent. Bar tape destroyed and handle bars twisted. I have quite a few sets of wheels and spares to sort it out. Titanium is tough thank goodness. I’m going to rebuild it and give it to my grandson to sell. He’s only 15 but a wheeler dealer already. When I’ve healed I’m joining the local gym. I used to train in the gym for many years as well as the bike. Van driver said I hit him, which is ridiculous. The police believed him and his mate as a witness.
Never think it’s going to happen but it does! Cyclists are 3rd party citizens. Glasses & Apple Watch wrecked.
The wife always asked me when I come back from a ride. ‘anyone try to kill ya’
My ankle is the worst very badly sprained. I’m done with bikes at 74 I’ve decided they can’t knock you off in the gym… I’m really very fit which belies my years. I just want to stay alive a few more years longer.
stay as safe as you can be guys/girls. ✊
“First one DRIVER pulled out
“First one DRIVER pulled out …”
“It was a van DRIVER, WHO totally wiped me out…”
I’m glad You’re relatively OK.
So what charges were filed
So what charges were filed against Mr. Doyle’s killer? Safer infrastructure is a great idea, but in the here and now, the most immediate thing that can be done is to create an environment that encourages drivers to drive responsibly. And part of that encouragement comes in making it clear bad driving is not acceptable.
Since lorry drivers seem to
We certainly could do with more legal feedback. But since lorry drivers seem to be struggling here why not just look at diverting them while they’re fixing the infra?
Encouraging drivers to take responsibility sounds simple and quick but I think it’s anything but. Or perhaps after fixing “most people, most of the time”, getting to “all people all of the time” is exponentially harder? Or “changing behaviour sometimes seems to need changing the infra anyway”?
Even for professional drivers where you’d think there was more leverage, “commercial pressures” enter the equation. (Obviously better companies will see this as a chance to avoid reputation damage, but several more will be scrapping over cheaper staff / working them longer / faster deliveries etc. )
Just as an aside, the knew
Just as an aside, the knew junction design in Glasgow has already seen the bollard, protecting the left turn where the lady was killed, missing (ripped from the base) then replaced and now flattened in place in a matter of weeks. Assuming a collision with left turning vehicles without the concrete curb as the base drivers would simply encroach into cyclists turning space.
Quote:
Erm – not by the image shown – the light there is green, and there are two other drivers in the process of travelling through the hatched box ahead. It seems more likely that the driver in question was just caught at the moment of crossing the cycle box, rather than having stopped in it.
(Not that I doubt that people do routinely stop in it.)
council says junction is
council says junction is “safe for all road users”
Will that be on Derek Doyle’s gravestone?
If the junction is safe for
If the junction is safe for all users then why are pedestrians afforded the luxury of pavements and button-controlled crossings? Surely the junction is safe enough and these can therefore be safely removed.
I’ve cycled for 40yrs since
I’ve cycled for 40yrs since childhood, and it became pretty evident very fast after a couple of discussions with my Dad at the time, who did drive for a living, to expect the worse outcome when I’m the road. I’ve driven for about 2yrs now and approach matters the very same cept the speeds are faster… God helps us all and stay safe out there 🙏✌️😎
It’s extremely frustrating to
It’s extremely frustrating to keep hearing about ‘dangerous roads’ when it’s road users that create the danger. Of course improvements to infrstructure can be made, but the most important factors in road safety are the skills and attitudes of road users. There is absolutely no requirement for drivers to maintain, develop or test their skills and attitudes on an ongoing basis. Instead we just get more speed cameras on motorways which have no positive effect on road safety at all, and are entitely irrelevant for vulnerable road users. How blind spots for HGV drivers is still a thing in the 21st century is mind boggling. It’s outrageous how long it takes and how many people have to be killed and injured before simple legislation is introduced to mandate for cheap cameras and a screen on new vehicles as standard and easy retrofit on existing commercial vehicles. Just look at the poor standard of driving displayed by gig economy van drivers, taxi drivers and so on. These are ‘professional’ drivers who should be held to a higher standard of training and testing yet we all know they are the ones to be extra cautious around because their driving standards are so poor. Until we focus on skills and attitudes, we will continue to have the same round circle conversations and road users will continue to be killed and injured in significant numbers.
All good especially direct
All good especially direct vision stuff etc.
But of course what is the big picture behind this?
– We have all voted for the convenience of “more stuff, more varied stuff”
– And online shopping
– And generally delivery with that.
… so there will be increasing volumes of stuff being moved about.
You can argue whether that’s safer done by private individuals or “professional drivers” (though i suspect the convenience of getting different things probably makes for more things being got).
However that sets up strong pressures to get more delivered cheaper. Whatever “better driving” measures you hope for have to fight that.
Oh, and at least in the UK the firms with “not-employees” have got ahead by winning a few legal cases and er… helping politicians. So feedback there has another level of disconnection…
We should definitely try to rein in the genie (probably can’t get it back in the bottle) and I’m all for making driving less like a “club” with the driving test as “initiation ceremony”…
BUT ultimately humans are fallible. Infrastructure always has a significant part to play in safety – the motorways you mention are paradigms of this (separation by direction, lanes, energy-absorbing crash barriers, continued gentle curves to provide feedback to keep people alert…)!
And more than that there will continue to be demand for driving where the alternatives aren’t convenient (because the direct route / lion’s share is given to mass motoring).
And doesn’t feel safe. Most humans simply won’t ride with lots of motor traffic or where speed differentials are high, no matter how much training motorists may have / how much the legal system promises to “throw the book at” offending road users. And it’s just not *pleasant* to do so either…
Final thought – the goal of
Final thought – the goal of “mass motoring” seems to have become “make it possible for the vast majority of adults to drive, anywhere, any time”.
I think that is fundamentally in conflict with the idea of eg. “Vision zero”. Something has to be modified here, or a different path chosen. (I’d go for “sustainable safety” and trying to fix it so there are sufficient alternatives to driving that for many trips people don’t feel they have to / the alternatives are attractive. At that point it’s easier to say “perhaps not everyone can obtain *and maintain* a sufficient skill level for safe driving…”)