The founder and designer of indoor wall-mounted bike storage manufacturer Cycloc has spoken out about the impact Brexit had on business, with sales down 25 per cent and a £100,000 hole in revenues.
Speaking to the Guardian from his east London studio, Andrew Lang said the fallout from the referendum in 2016 had been “very disappointing” and it is “very difficult to be positive” as “Kafkaesque” rules continue to lose Cycloc money.
Reviewing the company’s original bike storage product in 2009, we described it as “elegant, simple, expensive bike storage that’s more penthouse than outhouse” and Cycloc has since brought out numerous new products, including the Super Hero below.

However, Lang outlined how business has been affected by Brexit, saying it is disappointing to have lost out having “remained faithful” to manufacturing in the UK.
“It is very disappointing. I am a naturally optimistic person, but in a sense it is very difficult to be positive,” he said.
“One of the things that is quite disappointing about this whole process is that from the outset, we made an active decision to manufacture in the UK. We’ve remained faithful to that and it feels as though the UK government hasn’t necessarily helped us.
“We have about half a dozen products in the pipeline that are in a very advanced stage but we’ve not been able to commit the capital to bring those to the market yet because of the other Brexit costs and problems we’ve been confronted with.”
Cycloc had been enjoying success pre-referendum, with turnover of £450,000 and 10,000 units sold in the EU each year, however seven years later the picture is less positive — a 25 per cent decline in sales and a £100,000 hole in revenues.
The impact was not immediate but once rules came into effect in January 2021 business slowed and the company took a hit when Amazon stopped fulfilling orders for individual EU customers purchasing from the UK.
Head of operations Clare Lowe notes another problem with some “EU distributors stopping placing orders, citing cost of shipping and customs clearance as prohibitive”.
Cycloc hoped opening a warehouse in the Netherlands would mean paperwork could be filled in with every truckload from Dover, rather than on each individual order, but this still racked up £10,000 in overheads.
Lowe explained that it was obvious EU sales were “not going to recover to their pre-Brexit levels” meaning the warehouse would be operating at a loss.
“To say the Brexit process was gritty is an understatement,” she said. “Within 12 months of having got it up and running, we just had to take this decision to close it because it wasn’t covering its costs.”
Head of marketing Patron McCleary explained how the focus has now turned to being “reactive” and trying to tap into new markets in the US, Asia, Australia and South Africa.
“In places like China or Hong Kong I’m having to learn a lot about the culture, about buying habits, and how British products are viewed. It would have been easier in Europe, but because of how bad Brexit actually was, we’ve actually had to be quite reactive rather than being proactive,” he said.
The situation forced the Netherlands warehouse’s closure, meaning products are now sold direct to EU customers via an automated “import one-stop shop” in Ireland, and has left Lang questioning why the government has not done more to support British manufacturers.

Various small businesses within the cycling industry struggled to adapt to the changes at the end of the transition period, Dutch Bike Bits were just one of the brands to stop accepting orders from UK customers due to a change in VAT rules.
Three months later, in April 2021, the co-owner of Frog Bikes — the children’s bike manufacturer based out of a factory in Pontypool — said Brexit had cost him an extra £250,000 in the first two months of the year.
“I couldn’t say there was anything positive,” Jerry Lawson said at the time. “There’s extra paperwork, and there are extra costs. And there’s a whole lot of unknown.
“The paperwork is also incredible. To begin with, some of the countries wanted the paperwork in their language. Now we send them a commercial invoice with a whole lot of customs information. Plus, it’s four or five times we have to print it.
Prendas Ciclismo, perhaps best known for its reissues of some of the most iconic cycling jerseys including the Molteni kit once sported by Eddy Merckx and La Vie Claire as worn by Bernard Hinault and Greg LeMond, also scaled back its operations due to the impact of Brexit on the business that summer.




















55 thoughts on ““It is very difficult to be positive”: Brexit lost Cycloc 25% of sales, founder reveals”
Brexit, truly the gift that
Brexit, truly the gift that keeps on taking
jaymack wrote:
But, but, but, but BLUE PASSPORTS! SUNLIT UPLANDS!! UNICORNS!!! £350m a week for the NHS!!!!
I sometimes listen to James O’Brien on LBC and he often has pro-Brexit voters ringing in to whine about how this isn’t the Brexit they voted for.
Wotever…
Wotever…
eburtthebike wrote:
That was always going to be a problem as “Brexit” wasn’t sufficiently defined whereas “Remain” obviously had no wriggle room.
I’ll repeat my favourite analogy of voting on what to have for dinner:
Given a distribution of 30% vegetarians, 30% pork only eaters, 30% beef only eaters and 10% any type of meat eaters, you can set up the vote to be either meat or no meat. Then, you end up with 30% voting for no meat and 70% voting for meat, but having counted the votes with a clear majority, the problem comes when trying to actually provide that dinner. Pork will only be acceptable to 40% and beef will only be acceptable to 40% too, so it’s clear that the vote was poorly setup and the “meat” should have been defined.
That’s a good analogy but to
That’s a good analogy but to be more accurate it needs to include that beef was actually never an option and the person organising the dinner lied about the option of beef being available to try and make sure they got to organise the next dinner.
And also 45% of people were vegitarian….
I want chicken!
I want chicken!
Lamb for dinner.
Lamb for dinner.
wycombewheeler wrote:
I seem to remember there were lots of impassioned statements about how Brexit was obviously not going to be a Hard Brexit. Instead, Brexit was going to further the fortunes of good old British businesses such as Britishvolt…
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/22/business-minister-boasted-britishvolt-brexit-success-months-before-collapse
BritishVolt was just a scam
BritishVolt was just a scam designed to milk venture capitalists and Government grants for every penny they could get whilst producing precisely nothing.
To that end it succeeded wonderfully.
eburtthebike wrote:
I work with a number of people who voted for Brexit. I made a comment about how Brexit has messed things up last week. There was an embarrassed silence. They know but can’t quite admit it yet.
I made another similar comment today that also met with silence. Previously, the Brexit supporters would’ve responded loudly and vociferously.
We’ll never know now if it
We’ll never know now if it was possible to have a good brexit but I think you’ll find that it was the Johnson government that messed things up (brexit and non brexit)
Backladder wrote:
You can’t really mess up something that is already a complete and utter farrage.
Backladder wrote:
Leaving the Customs Union and European Econimic Area was stupid. It’s that simple.
It has gone quiet, hasn’t it.
It has gone quiet, hasn’t it. Those Brexit ‘pluses’ (formerly benefits) in full attached.
6, 7 and 8freedom of movement – ah yes, “the country is over-crowded” and “there would be more of these oh so finite resources to go around if there were less people consuming them” – the economics of simpletons and bigots.
The brexiter that posted this was really insistent about no 1 – like as opposed to the most restrictive and iffy UK govt in centuries.
Oh and we’re not allowed another referendum because that would be like a football match continually being replayed (or something). I can’t recall any serious narrative that said “the EU made us do x/ stopped us doing y so we’re not accountable.”
11 vaccines and 15 – ECHR: lies, and also see 1 above – your rights and protections all at threat.
10, 12 and 13 : Going well, is it? fishing, trade deals, lower food ?? prices.
I don’t know enough about GDP or the workings of inflation and interest rates, other than the last two are up at 30-40 year highs.
Point 11. We probably shouldn
Point 11. We probably shouldn’t be proud of our rolling out of COVID.
This is true
This is true
because the leave campaign was banging on about the success of Norway (european economic area) and Switzerland (EFTA) they never advocated
And the UK has ended up with neither of these, EEA includes Iceland, Norway, Turkey and the microstates. EFTA adds in Switzerland, leaving only Moldova, Russia and the UK outside of these arrangements. No Leave slogan ever extoled the benefits of Moldova.
But of course this comes back to the referendum and rational people pointing out that you can’t trust the bunch of crooks like Rees Mogg, Baker and Johnson, and voters deciding that was paranoia
My favourite joke at
My favourite joke at Christmas this year was about the Brexit advent calendar – every day, another door closes.
It would be funny if it weren’t true. Off to the Alps at the weekend – got little stickers for the number plates, not sure if we’re allowed to take food in the car for the journey, still trying to find out if I need a green card. The dog could come, but he’s unacceptable unless he has the same paperwork as a cow.
Don’t get me started on the trials of buying a house in the EU – a long-term plan now showing ominous engine fire and oil pressure warning lights….
Don’t think the small
Don’t think the small businesses are getting across that it’s now not worth buying from them for us in the EU. I bought two jerseys last summer that I had to then pay customs on at arrival that was about 40% of the original cost. And I mean the €£ exchange on arrival and not the slightly better exchange I’d got on the day of purchase!
thats because those
thats because those businesses are letting you pay the customs/VAT registration costs, instead of rolling it in as just a cost to their business and doing the sums so it pays for itself with price of the products they sold to you and sort it for you.
thats their choice, as it is your choice to shop elsewhere, thats how business works in capitalism you pays your money and you takes your choice.
with Cycloc, the article states they had a 50/50 split of the sales in the EU v UK, but have lost 25% sales overall, so its not all to do with Brexit or red tape is it ? theyve clearly lost sales in the UK as well.
and part of the issue appears to be they lost their Amazon EU delivery mechanism (you know the company who guardianistas say dont pay enough taxes…) but now do sales via Ireland to the EU, which seems reasonable solution to their EU supply.
so maybe, just maybe the issue is there isnt the sustainable demand for 10,000 bits of plastic to stick your bike to wall per year in the EU/UK. Once youve bought one, youre kind of sorted unless you keep buying n+1, and perhaps “pivoting” to the US and other markets when you live in a global economy was something they needed to think of sooner.
This is what I was thinking.
This is what I was thinking. It’s not like these things wear out and need replacing. And I’m pretty sure if you move, you’ll take them off the wall and fit them in the new place.
Awavey wrote:
What?
It’s possible sales in the UK have increased, stayed the same or reduced, it’s , you can not come to the conclusion that UK sales have definitely fallen.
Pre Brexit 50 sales UK, and 50 Sales EU
Post Brexit 75 sales total,
could be 50 UK and 25 EU, as some EU customer put up with incrased costs
could be 75 UK and 0 EU, either due to growth in domestic market as people bought more bikes, or due to Cycloc stealing share from EU suppliers as UK customers see alternative EU products as unaffordable to to import costs
could be 37.5 from each, with Brexit not being a factor.
But we don’t knw
The Confederation of British
The Confederation of British Industry said exactly the same recently. Millions of sensible and knowledgeable people said this would happen. Brexit has increased red tape and shrunk growth. Exactly as was predicted – except by the swivel eyed brigade.
On a planet of finite size,
On a planet of finite size, constant growth is overrated.
Edward Abbey wrote:
I work for a large
I work for a large international company, and seeing the impact it has had on us it was clear smaller companies just wouldn’t survive. From a functional perspective we had to move our European HQ out of London to the Netherlands, thankfully from an operational perspective London remained and most jobs were safe.
The red tape though is insane. Just shipping equipment between UK and EU is a nightmare and where we used to order equipment from a UK supplier who would ship to EU offices, we no longer do that. The Paris office handles it using a supplier in the EU.
I think Brexit was about
I think Brexit was about English sovereignty, whatever that is.
I suspect the slight majority
I suspect the slight majority of people voting for it* had something to do with it…
Having a vote at all seems to have been a badly-miscalculated attempt to soothe part of the Conservative party / sweep some divisions under the carpet. (But I haven’t read any of the ex-premiers’ books…)
* Very much depending on who you want to count as “us”, geographically etc. but of course the results depended on “everyone”.
Much as I disagree with
Much as I disagree with brexit
The referendum policy was agreed at the party conference
The policy went into the manisfesto
The party won the election
The referendum was held.
Isn’t this exactly how party politics is supposed to work? parties agree policies, put them to the electorate, and then enact them if they win?
This wasn’t some fringe element of the party that needed to be placated to play nice, it was in fact most of the party, EXCEPT the more reasonable people chosen to lead the party to appeal to the middle ground of UK voters.
Anyone thinking it is only party outliers in favour of brexit is not considering the membership, and only the MPs.
Indeed – I was indeed
Indeed – I was indeed mistaking the MPs for the “party”. However I’m pretty sure many Conservative MPs weren’t thrilled by the eventual result – so it was likely still “we’ll run this for the members as we know it will fail”:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-truth-about-david-cameron-and-the-mad-swivel-eyed-loons/
And yet so many other parts
And yet so many other parts of manifestos get ditched as soon as they can…
Exactly, Brexit probably has
Exactly, Brexit probably has more of a democratic mandate than anything else that’s ever been done in the UK.
An unashamedly pro Brexit manifesto even won a large majority after the vote, to go with the multiple democratic hoops it had already jumped through.
The idea that the Brexit vote was undemocratic is straight from the Trump/Bolsonaro playbook and, interestingly enough, predates their particular struggles with understanding democracy.
Rich_cb wrote:
Really, 52/48 is a bigger democratic mandate than the 1975 European Communities membership referendum in which the people voted to join the EEC 67/32? You know, the democratic vote that you and your fellow leavers spent 40 years trying to overturn?
Brexit always brings to mind
Brexit always brings to mind the (supposed) Churchill remark,
“The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter!”
I believe Churchill also said
I believe Churchill also said something along the lines of “Democracy is the worst form of government, apart from all the others”.
Agree with all that, but it
Agree with all that, but it was an advisory referendum that then became immutable after the fact. “brexit” was never defined, and a lot of Pro-Brexit voters are left scratching their heads at what they got. We are now where we are though, can’t unwind the dishonesty and stupidity now. Need to get on with whatever Brexit *IS*. (Or in true British style we can wait another 10 years to define it while the economy slumps further…)
Bigfoz wrote:
This is a really important point that everyone seems to forget. If they had tried to make it a binding referendum, the referendum itself would never have been agreed in the first place. The ilk in the ERG played an absolute blinder.
That doesn’t really explain
That doesn’t really explain why 38% of Scottish, 52.5% of Welsh, 44.2% of Northern Irish voters wanted to leave.
It’s not as simple as just putthing the blame on the English. All the votes counted the same everywhere in the UK.
If the 2.2 million leave voters in the other Home Nations had been convinced of the foolishness of Brexit they would have carried the vote.
It was so close that if Vote Leave hadn’t broken the spending rules or written lies on the side of Johnson’s bus it probably would have saved us too.
That’s what’s so galling about the whole thing. You couldn’t even bring a union out on a on day strike or change your cycling club’s constitution with the tiny majority that Brexit had. Yet we have to swallow bankrupting the country for it.
lio wrote:
You’re forgetting about all the tangible benefits that Brexit has ushered in
Exactly, what would anyone
Exactly, what would anyone have talked about on social media if we didn’t have brexit?
Lincolnshire and the Thames
Lincolnshire and the Thames Estuary – Brexit Central.
Yes the bus persuaded 500,000
Yes the bus persuaded 500,000 people to change their minds…
Possibly the most effective bit of political advertising ever.
What was Blair’s share of the vote in 1997? Or Thatcher’s in 1979?
They were both considerably under 50% yet ushered in huge societal changes.
https://iamkate.com/data/minority-rule/
The idea that we need more than a majority in this
particular case is simply antidemocratic.
As an aside, even with the ‘broken rules’ (which amounted to no more than a paperwork error) Remain still vastly outspent Leave (19.3m Vs 13.3m).
In a fair democracy both would have been funded equally so, by your logic, the result would have been even more emphatic.
https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-we-do/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/eu-referendum/campaign-spending-eu-referendum
Rich_cb wrote:
The bus slogan was a very visible cherry on top of a cake that was built mostly on lies. Poisonous lies that had been propagated for years through much of the media and ones that many people were very happy to repeat ad nauseam so that in the end they seemed to become facts. Alt facts, you could call them. Racism and xenophobia have flourished, like history repeating itself.
Meanwhile, whatever the pattern of voting and the statistics of the outcome of the referendum, Brexit has undoubtedly been the biggest, most monumental and avoidable fuck-up / self-harm exercise by a British government in living memory. Possibly longer. Sadly some people find it far more important to deny that and pretend that the vote was some kind of ‘fair fight’ and ignore the vast array of serious negative consequences, which will be felt for many years.
Meanwhile, everything Remain
Meanwhile, everything Remain said was absolutely true…
Politicians lie, Remain lied just as much as Leave.
If you think some relatively minor trade disruption is the biggest political disaster in living memory I’d suggest you pick up a history book.
Rich_cb wrote:
Which particular Remain lie was as bad as the lie on the bus?
I’m not trying to say that there weren’t exaggerations by Remain, but I can’t think of any outright lies.
The bus slogan took the gross
The bus slogan took the gross EU contributions figure instead of the net figure after the rebate. Would the slogan have been less effective with £200m as the figure? I doubt it, it’s still an unfathomable sum for most people.
The biggest lies Remain told were about house prices and interest rates.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/20/eu-referendum-george-osborne-house-prices-brexit
The Treasury ‘analysis’ that produced those wildly inaccurate prediction was deliberately skewed in order to produce a politically useful figure for the Remain
campaign.
I would argue that utilising a supposedly neutral government department to produce engineered predictions in an attempt to influence a democratic vote is quite a lot worse than any bus slogan, however ambiguous.
Rich_cb wrote:
I don’t remember seeing that particular forecast – I’d take it as a plus if house prices were to be reduced (and I do own my own house).
I’d say that the bus slogan was more than just ambiguous – it was even denied to ever exist according to at least one person that was photographed alongside the same bus.
“Let’s fund our NHS instead”
“Let’s fund our NHS instead” is a classically ambiguous political statement.
It’s deliberately not a promise or even a definite course of action.
In the context of a freestanding referendum it was perfect as the winners of the referendum would not necessarily be in government to make such decisions.
The bus slogan was incredibly clever in that regard.
It enraged Remainers and thus ensured it had enormous press coverage. Those desperately correcting the £350m figure were unwittingly helping the Leave cause by highlighting quite how much money we actually ‘sent’.
I would tend to agree that house prices need to come down but I think we are very much in the minority, for most voters the prospect of a near 20% drop in house prices was terrifying. It was a huge story at the time, I’m surprised you missed it. The fact it was a deliberately false figure produced by a government department shows the extent of dishonesty throughout both campaigns.
Rich_cb wrote:
FTFY
I wonder when or if we’ll reach the point where youngsters that have little hope of owning their own home will out-number the property owners.
The interesting point will
The interesting point will occur when remote working is fully established (I think we’re pretty much there now tbh) and populations start falling rapidly in other nearby countries.
Why pay through the nose for a property in the UK when Italy, Portugal, Latvia etc will be crying out for people to come and live there. (All are projected for a 10-20% population decrease over the next 20-30years or so.)
Think they have been for
Think they have been for years, no?
https://www.idealista.com/en/news/lifestyle-spain/2022/11/30/7292-towns-and-villages-spain-where-you-could-get-paid-live
Pretty sure most people will stay put. After all, they could have done exactly that kind of thing when we were a member of the EU!
I suspect for most personal ties / family / cultural familiarity / the UK’s often proudly monolingual culture will keep things much as they are.
Whether we see more people headed in the opposite direction because of war / no water / famine / their country flooding is another thing entirely. I suspect that for all kinds of reasons (yes – economic too, we’re still looking good from Albania) we’ll still be trying to “take back control of our borders” for decades!
There’s been an urbanisation
There’s been an urbanisation trend for a long time but we’re on the cusp of something quite unprecedented.
Eastern Europe will see populations fall by nearly 40% peak to trough by 2050. Southern Europe won’t be too far behind. Supply and demand being what it is we should see property prices plummeting in these areas so the pull factor will be far greater than it was in the past.
Further afield Japan’s population is already decreasing rapidly and China’s has just started to decline.
The sheer shortage of workers this will produce globally means countries are more likely to be competing for immigrants rather than putting up barriers to them.
Rich_cb wrote:
The collapse of modern civilisation?
Perhaps.
Perhaps.
Most of those countries won’t be able to afford anything like the welfare state in its current form once their working populations collapse.
Rich_cb wrote:
We’re reached the “it’s not
We’re reached the “it’s not that bad” stage. Benefits have changed into “pluses” but it never was about that – “Brexit is whatever we say it is.”
Spa Cycles stopped selling to Europe. Rose stopped selling to the UK. I have recently bought from a German cycle shop, but there were additional charges.
A vote to be poorer as a nation and as individuals, a cost of living crisis, inflation, interest rates, cash-strapped councils and national parks, pot-holes. Lies, bigotry, spite; apathy if you didn’t vote. Please don’t tell me Brexiters want to save the planet with less growth.
Someone is benefitting from this mess, but it ain’t the man in the street.