Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“A flagrant act of vandalism”: Council agrees to move “ugly” bike rack after churchgoers say it will “block access for hearses”

“It seems the deluded secularists of the city council are determined to close the church,” said one local councillor opposed to the scheme

Bristol City Council has agreed to move the planned location of a cycle rack – originally intended to be positioned outside a city centre church – after churchgoers and opposition councillors branded it a “flagrant act of vandalism” and claimed the bike rack would “block access for hearses”.

The soon-to-installed covered cycle rack forms part of the local authority’s plans to implement measures, introduced on a temporary basis in 2020, that would limit the use of motor vehicles in Bristol’s Old City and encourage cycling and walking, reduce air pollution, and open up the area for more on-street commercial and cultural use.

The rack was initially set to be installed at the top of Broad Street, outside Christ Church with St Ewen, a Church of England parish church and Grade II* listed building, built in the late eighteenth century.

However, the plan was roundly condemned by the church’s members and employees after contractors were spotted installing temporary fencing around a space in front of the building, forcing the council to alter the scheme by moving the rack closer to the existing planters on Broad Street.

> Plan to permanently pedestrianise heart of Bristol city centre to be put to council for approval

Jonathan Price, the Master of Music at Christ Church with St Ewen, told BristolLive that the installation of an “ugly” bike rack would “spoil the view” of the building and restrict accessibility to the church.

 “I was simply horrified by what the council workmen said they were creating,” he said. “I asked one of the team who was expected to use the covered cycle rack, and he replied, ‘nobody’.

“Christ Church needs clear access here for hearses bringing bodies for funerals, bridal cars, and for our infirm and disabled worshippers. Even the current bollards on the street edge spoil the view of our lovely Grade-II listed church. With an ugly cycle rack here, it will be much, much worse.”

> "There's a car park 20 metres away": Cyclists slam cycle lane parking putting riders in danger

Conservative councillor Richard Eddy, who also attends Christ Church, claimed that the plans amounted to a “flagrant act of vandalism” and criticised the Labour-controlled council as “deluded secularists determined to close the church”.

“When I heard of the council plans outside Christ Church, I was aghast that the local authority intended to despoil this Grade-II listed building by a flagrant act of vandalism,” Eddy said.

“Over the last six years, worshippers at Christ Church have seen Sunday parking charges imposed on them, the repeated refusal of the council to allow strictly limited parking for the congregation, road closures, and the designation of the Clean Air Zone surrounding the church.”

He continued: “Now we have this hare-brained scheme to erect a cycle rack outside the church. It seems the deluded secularists of the city council are determined to close the church. If there is a demand for a cycle rack nearby, there is a wide and ample pavement only yards away on Wine Street. Why wasn’t this considered by the council?

“The council has a statutory obligation to ensure physical structures in a sensitive conservation area such as this — especially those abutting a listed church — enhance the character of the conservation area, and certainly do not harm it.”

> Council warned that removing key cycle lane would be “real PR risk” – but pressed ahead anyway

Following this vocal criticism, Bristol City Council has agreed to move the bike rack further down Broad Street – though the local authority noted that the public had been consulted about the plans to erect a cycle rack outside the church, but that they did not receive any comments or complaints from residents.

Labour Councillor Don Alexander, Bristol’s cabinet member for transport, said: “I met with officers on site to consider feedback and options for the planned cycle parking stand at the top of Broad Street, and asked for it to be moved. It has now been agreed that it will be installed two metres closer to the existing planters.

“This will allow more room for vehicles that need to stop close to the church and will mean the cycle parking stands won’t obstruct the church door. As part of the works to install the new cycle parking stand, the bollards currently in the road outside the church door will also be moved.”

> Enforcing cycle lane would prevent drivers from parking (illegally) outside Presbyterian church, claims Dublin elder

The condemnation of the proposed cycle rack outside Christ Church in Bristol isn’t the first time that a piece of cycling infrastructure has received ecclesiastical censure in recent years.

Last January, a Presbyterian church in Dublin criticised plans to segregate an existing cycle lane from traffic, which it claimed would prevent worshippers from continuing to park – illegally – outside the church.

The installation of bollards outside Howth Presbyterian Church was intended by the local county council to prevent motorists from parking along the cycle lane and to ensure “safer infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians”.

However, elder Michael Sparksman argued that the proposed bollards would mean that “the right to worship is being overtaken by the right to cycle.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
Clem Fandango | 1 year ago
13 likes

“the right to worship is being overtaken by the right to cycle.”

Uh-huh.  If they were planning on installing a velodrome within the church I might agree, however (putting aside that shifting the cycle rack a few metres away doesn't seem unreasonable) it seems that this is more about the right to drive to & park near the place than anything else.  Eddy actually also seems to be complaining that the church is now within a clean air zone FFS.  Presumably covering the building in pollution & forcing the congregation to inhale vehicle emmissions is all just God's work? (This ones anyway).

Avatar
wtjs | 1 year ago
10 likes

What they're really concerned about is not so much the rack as the ugly bikes to be placed there, reminding them of all those times they have been enraged at the presence of same on the roads 

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
8 likes

Firstly: Richard Eddy is a total bile-filled 'Tory' and him protesting about this doesn't surprise me at all.

Second comment - it astounds me to learn that that church has a congregation and regular services.  I've never seen the doors open.  Ever.  I had assumed that it was one of those 'tourist churches', a relic which only exists so people can admire the architecture...

Avatar
Carior | 1 year ago
15 likes

The irony of "how dare they put an ugly bike rack outside our church that'll spoil it, when they won't let us drive our cars there, park outside and spray dirt and pollution all over it out of our vehicles".

Indeed, its a shame that these people get so het up about a bike rack not enhancing the character of the building but the vans and other motor vehicles that no doubt park there (as seen in the cover shot) are all entirely in keeping with an 18th century building and definitely enhance it with a sea of smog and particulate matter... 

whilst I don't necessarily disagree - and based on the photo it doesn't seem the best spot for a bike rack - there's an awful lot of hyperbole going on from these frothy mouthed presumably posh people!

Avatar
levestane replied to Carior | 1 year ago
2 likes

Given the 'achievements' of the church I'm not sure the right to object to a bike rack has been earnt.

Avatar
mattsccm replied to levestane | 1 year ago
2 likes

Equally why place such a rack in a place where it annoys people if there is a perfectly good place nearby that doesn't?  funerals and weddings are an established part of society and thus  should not be hindered if avoidable. If this was the only place then I would see the point but this looks to have been done with no actual forethought . The suggestion that a consultation was made is disingenious as they are rarely actually easy to use or easily accessible. Tucked away in the back pages of the samll print in the local rag and pointing to an online survey that has fixed answers doesn't count. However the Dublin story is different. Anything lawbreaking, be it car parking or pavement cycling should be stamped on from a huge height with a heavy boot. 

Pages

Latest Comments