news

# Helmet laws fail maths test

...number crunching report shows compulsory helmet law would do more harm than good

The hotly contested issue of whether bicycle helmets should be made mandatory benefits from some new, mathematical, evidence today.

According to a new study, by Piet de Jong, a mathematician at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, the answer is no. He says bicycle helmet laws would cost the US \$4.8 billion per year, Netherlands \$1.9 billion, and the UK \$0.4 billion.

Helmet laws like those in effect in Australia result in a substantial cost to the healthcare system because savings from fewer head injuries pale in comparison to costs incurred by decreases in cycling, according to de Jong’s mathematical model.

Scrolling through the pages of eye-bulging mathematical equations to the section at the end of the report marked, “Conclusion”, we extracted the following.

“The model recognizes one health benefit (exercise) and one health cost (injuries). A positive net benefit occurs if and only if the proportionate drop in cycling multiplied by a coefficient, called the bicycling beta, is less than the proportionate increase in accident costs when not wearing a helmet.

“The bicycling beta captures the relative benefit of exercise compared to accidents. Using widely cited estimates of the exercise benefit of cycling, costs of head injuries and reductions in cycling leads to the conclusion that bicycle helmet laws do not deliver a positive societal health benefit.”

ie. compulsory helmet laws = bad.

While we here at road.cc felt slightly under-qualified to fully interpret the complicated equations (see below) employed by the good mathematician, luckily the New Scientist has done it already.

A

Their conclusions of de Jong’s conclusions show that only under extreme, theoretical circumstances do mandatory helmet laws not end up costing healthcare systems.

"Even under very favourable assumptions to the pro-helmet lobby group, it's very hard to get a benefit," de Jong told the publication.

Find out what the CTC has to say about the matter here

• Brauchsel 1 sec ago

Why? A failing business doesn't have a moral right to exist in perpetuity, and if people won't pay the RRP that tells the R that their RP is too...

• chrisonatrike 15 min 26 sec ago

No, because people tell me they're individuals who are only interested in stoking controversy to enhance their public profile at the expense of...

• wycombewheeler 16 min 47 sec ago

I don't think that is a level playng field, by trams runing at a loss it sounds ike you are only comparing tram fares with running costs, but for...

• PRSboy 23 min 40 sec ago

My avatar seems to like sitting right on the edge of the group in the wind!  How can he be encouraged to stay in the middle?...

• Djchadders 52 min 20 sec ago

You know what Clem, I've never read "Far from the madding crowd". However, I did once see a film adaptation starring Terence Stamp....

• chrisonatrike 57 min 42 sec ago

Reference to the scrap about politics prompted by a dig at the Conservatives made by a road.cc reviewer in this map review article.

• fukawitribe 57 min 58 sec ago

Lots of good options and advice above, i'd also maybe suggest RedWhite for a bib focused company (especially long distance) with a good reputation...

• TheAdebo 2 hours 2 min ago

Huge difference between being impolite and punching someone repeatedly in the face and tasing them....

• matthewn5 2 hours 37 min ago

.

• Fignon's ghost 3 hours 7 min ago

I'm not blaming the cyclist. Far from it. The reason the crime is being committed is due to the value of the bike in a pub car park. It's worth...