Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Keep 'em peeled: Lancashire cyclist seeks return of two stolen Pinarello bikes and other kit

Time-trial and road frame and other high-end kit worth £10,000 taken by thieves

A club champion cyclist from Lancashire is appealing to fellow bike riders to keep an eye out for two high-spec bikes stolen from his home, worth a combined £10,000. The bikes were stolen from the home in Earby, Lancashire of Jason Bateman, a member of Pendle Forest Cycling Club and current holder of the North Lancashire Time Trial Association Speed Bar Title.

The thieves broke into the 39-year-old’s home through the patio doors, he told the Lancashire Telegraph.

“The bikes are set up for my positioning and one is specifically a racing bike,” Jason continued. “It isn’t comfortable so you couldn’t just go out for a ride on the road. It’s designed to take you out of the wind, so it’s a pretty specialist piece of kit.”

“At first I thought they had targeted my property just for the bikes, but the police think it might have been a gang who steal high-powered cars because I have an Audi S3.
“People in the cycling community will know how important the bikes are, so I would ask them to keep their eyes open and if they see or hear anything, to let me or the police know.”

The bikes in question are a blue and white Pinarello FP2 time trial frame, sized small, equipped with a 10-speed Shimano Dura Ace groupset, and finished with Missile tri-bars, a black Pinarello black seat pin and rotor elliptical main chainring, together with blue Speedplay pedals.

The other bike, which again has 10-speed Dura Ace componentry, is a Pinarello Dogma coloured red and black, with white saddle, bars and Speedplay pedals and Mavic R-Sys wheels.

Also taken was a Zipp 808 wheelset – that alone retails for around £2,000 the pair – complete with Dura Ace cassette and Michelin Pro Race tyres.

Anyone with information regarding the bikes and parts is asked to call police on 0845 125 3545, or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555111.
 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
Michael5 | 12 years ago
0 likes

Good ole ebay would be a starting point.. probably end up there at a bargain price.

Avatar
whizzkid | 12 years ago
0 likes

Maybe nicked by some kids that want to get round their paper rounds a bit faster.......?

Avatar
Tony Farrelly | 12 years ago
0 likes

Hi Antonio, two seconds on Google would tell anyone who wanted to know how much that kit cost, plus the reason that it's news is that it's such expensive stuff. Plus it was all over the Lancashire Telegraph in the first place.

In this case the police view was that a gang who target high powered cars had taken the bikes instead, although Mr Bateman thought they were after his bikes.

Certainly in a similar case that that happened to a mate of mine the police reckoned that the crime was committed by people with some inolvment in, and knowlege of, cycling – the more common or garden bike thief by contrast will simply nick whatever is easiest - it's a numbers game for them.

Avatar
antonio | 12 years ago
0 likes

Is it really right to publish the value of just two bikes at £10,000. and wheels at £2,000. surely this just lets the scroats out there think all racing bikes and wheels have the same value. A description of the bikes would be suffice as I would think most bikies would already know the cost of a good bike these days, just a thought.

Latest Comments