- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
2 comments
They've already screwed up Blackfriars bridge cycle lanes up once by having a cycle lane in the middle of the road, thus putting cyclists in danger from both sides. Now they have a relatively safe cycle route across it they want to change it again. Paul M is right, cars will race each other up the inside lane putting cyclists in danger. This is a well used route into the city and cars should not be the only priority.
There is a lot of misinformation going on about the TfL proposals.
They are NOT saying that they are removing a cycle lane "on Blackfriars Bridge" - the lane in question is on dry land, on the north side of the bridge where the roads interchange withthe embankment. The 2.5m wide lane northbound on the bridge and the rather less satisfactory narrower lane southbound on the bridge are not, apparently, affected.
They are also NOT proposing a "mixed use path" - there is no shared space with pedestrians involved here.
What they are proposing is the removal of a fairly short stretch of cycle lane from the junction on the north bank towards the bridge itself - from the plans it looks like a distance of only about 20-30 metres. This isn't the real problem - the problem is that they are cramming in a second traffic lane for southbound traffic. As the inside lane on the bridge itself is a 24h bus lane, any traffic in the inside lane leading up to this will no doubt race to beat traffic in the right hand lane and 'undertake' them before the bus lane starts, and it is of course this inside lane which conflicts with cycle traffic.
There are other problems for cyclists, around maneouvres to cross the traffic when turning right for example.
And finally they are planning to remove a pedestrian crossing which in its short existence has become extremely popular.
All this in the name of smoothing traffic flow, but also driven by Network Rail whose ides of "benefiting pedestrians" (the stated aim of TfL in this scheme) can see no further than pedestrians who want to get to the station entrance