The tragic death of actress Natasha Richardson from a head injury sustained while skiing has reignited the contentious issue of helmet use in skiing, cycling and sport in general.
The 45-year-old actress, the wife of Liam Neeson, was not wearing a helmet when she had her accident during a skiing lesson on a beginner slope in Qebec, Canada. Although the accident initially seemed innocuous, her condition quickly deteriorated and she later died in a New York hospital.
During a discussion on Radio 5 Live today Peter McCabe, chief executive of Headway, the brain injury association, widened the debate from skiing to other sports, including cycling, telling host Nicky Campbell: “I cycle regularly. I would never cycle without a helmet. If I were a skier, if my children were going off skiing I’d beg them to wear a helmet and that’s because I know just how easy it is to damage that most precious part of you". You can listen to the discussion clip here.
The arguments for and against wearing a helmet are well documented. As reported by road.cc, the debate was given a new angle recently when a High Court judge ruled that cyclists could be open to “contributory negligence” claims in cases where a helmet would have made a difference to their injuries.
The comments were made in the case of Smith v Finch, the full judgement of which the CTC has helpfully reproduced here.
The CTC stands by its long-held view that helmet use should remain a decision for the individual, quoting the following points:
• Cycling is no more risky than lots of other routine activities. You are more likely to be killed in a mile of walking than a mile of cycling.
• Cycling is more likely to do you good than harm and studies from Australia and New Zealand show that enforcing the wearing of helmets leads to a drop in cycling levels.
A statement posted today on its website concludes: “We don’t want anything to put people off cycling – not just because it’s healthy, but also because there is clear evidence that the more people who cycle, the safer it gets for each individual cyclist.
“We recognise that some people choose to wear a helmet for their own personal reasons, and we will always support a person’s right to make that choice.”
For a full appraisal of the information and research surrounding cycling helmets follow this link to the Helmets page of the CTC website.
I now use some fulcrum night something's or whatever but there ultra light 1500grm even with a cassette & tyres, I also use some 3t wheels...
I never thought the police use the term accident now? more the term RTC 🤔
Welcome to the Dark Side*! It is a very varied church - if a rather tiny one....
Really depends on your use-case and how much you're prepared to pay. You may have particular requirements for efficiency / low drag / convenience ...
Could Road.cc highlight the percentage of close passes reported in Grimsby and what action was taken. I suspect the zero tolerance only applies if...
Your assumptions about my "beliefs" must also based on the results of your mathematical models. I've never bought bike parts because of what they...
They called me later that evening to say the driver was apologetic and would be driving according to the Highway Code of allowing 1.5m when passing...
In its email, the force added: “Your help in taking the time to make us aware of this matter is greatly appreciated and will improve the safety on...
The quote from the appeal court judgement is not saying that Auriol Grey did anything wrong. That is the essence of the judgement. Her actions...
In theory, Colchester is getting one but I expect the haters will be out to stop it. There are a number of regulars who just say "That would not...